01.08.2014 Views

Post-enumeration Survey (PES) - Statistics South Africa

Post-enumeration Survey (PES) - Statistics South Africa

Post-enumeration Survey (PES) - Statistics South Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Statistics</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />

19<br />

Recruitment and training of field staff<br />

The recruitment strategy for the <strong>PES</strong> stated that there would be over-recruitment by 20% in each<br />

province in order to increase the pool of candidates to choose from at the completion of training. This<br />

was not always possible to achieve since the field staff database was exhausted in most provinces by<br />

the time <strong>PES</strong> started recruiting. In some instances, people were headhunted from the areas in which the<br />

<strong>PES</strong> was conducted, but this was not always successful. Some trainees also dropped out of training,<br />

which also reduced the number of candidates to choose from. Human Resource Management (HRM)<br />

processes also had a negative impact on progress in instances whereby field staff had to be replaced.<br />

Numerous follow-ups had to be made regarding the signing of documents for the appointment of staff.<br />

The secondment of permanent staff also proved to be a challenge in instances where some of them<br />

refused to work over weekends (which was a requirement for census and <strong>PES</strong> fieldwork due to<br />

timeframes), or they undermined the authority of contract staff who were in higher positions. This had a<br />

negative impact on staff morale because it meant that one person had to do the work of two people over<br />

the weekends.<br />

Publicity and listing<br />

Publicity and listing was initially planned for 07 to 22 November 2011, but due to the large presence of<br />

census field staff in the field and a decision by senior management, the start date for publicity and listing<br />

was moved to 14 November 2011. This meant that the period for this exercise was shortened to at least<br />

a week, leaving very little time for the team to conduct comprehensive quality assurance on listings. This<br />

resulted in the team having to do numerous updates on the EA Summary Books during <strong>enumeration</strong> for<br />

the structures that had been missed during listing. Despite the postponement of <strong>PES</strong> publicity and listing,<br />

census field staff was still present in some EAs that were in the <strong>PES</strong> sample, which compromised the<br />

independence of the <strong>PES</strong>.<br />

Pamphlets and posters were only available in English, which meant that Fieldworkers had to spend a lot<br />

of time explaining the messages in these posters and pamphlets in the language of the respondent. The<br />

quality of the posters was also poor (posters were easily ruined by wind and rain, and had a small font<br />

size). The fact that the census had not communicated to the public about the <strong>PES</strong> (despite the fact that<br />

the <strong>PES</strong> had requested census to include messages on <strong>PES</strong> in census publicity material) also meant<br />

that Fieldworkers had to spend a lot of time explaining the purpose of their visit to respondents, which<br />

resulted in refusals in some cases.<br />

<strong>Post</strong> Enumeration <strong>Survey</strong> (<strong>PES</strong>)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!