01.08.2014 Views

Post-enumeration Survey (PES) - Statistics South Africa

Post-enumeration Survey (PES) - Statistics South Africa

Post-enumeration Survey (PES) - Statistics South Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Statistics</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />

35<br />

Adjusted census population =<br />

Adjusted 'Population within in-scope sub-universe'<br />

+ Unadjusted 'Balance of population'.<br />

It is worth noting that <strong>PES</strong> adjustment factors were based on the original geographic and demographic<br />

classifications of persons. For geography type and EA type, 'original' referred to the classification in the<br />

Census 2011 frame, before EA type changes occurred. For living-quarters type and for demographic<br />

variables, 'original' refers to these variables as originally reported in the census.<br />

Therefore, to maintain compatibility between the distribution of <strong>PES</strong> cases and census cases, the<br />

original classifications (i.e., unedited or 'raw' data before editing and imputation) were used to decide<br />

which factor a person would receive. Thus, census persons received the adjustment factor<br />

corresponding to their original geography type and EA type, original living-quarters type, and original<br />

sex/age group/population group cell. Once the adjustment factors were applied, persons and households<br />

were permitted to shift to post-editing classification cells (which render census data more accurate and<br />

more meaningful), but they carried their original adjustment factors individually into their new cells.<br />

5.6 Content evaluation for persons<br />

Content analysis is discussed in Section 8.1. The following must be noted regarding the use of the <strong>PES</strong><br />

for the measurement of content error:<br />

• It is limited to matched cases.<br />

• It is limited to the in-scope sub-universe, consisting of dwelling units and hostels within in-scope EA<br />

types.<br />

• The <strong>PES</strong> is not assumed to provide the 'truth'; therefore, response bias is not measured, only<br />

response variance.<br />

• Comparison is of unedited <strong>PES</strong> and census socio-demographic responses. (<strong>PES</strong> socio-demographic<br />

data are not subject to edit; census data are, but these edits take place outside the <strong>PES</strong>.)<br />

• Unlike the census and <strong>PES</strong> questionnaires in the <strong>PES</strong> sample, data capture for the full census was<br />

not by key-from-paper but by scanning with rigorous quality control. In addition, census data were<br />

later subject to an intensive edit and automatic-correction process. Hence, to a certain extent, the<br />

data quality in the published census results is improved over what is indicated by the content analysis.<br />

It was also noted in Section 8.1 that the estimated person totals shown in the content analysis tables do<br />

not coincide with the final census totals for each characteristic because:<br />

• they are based on the sample of census records in the <strong>PES</strong> and are, therefore, subject to sampling<br />

variability;<br />

• they include only matched cases, not the full sample;<br />

• they are unedited while the census characteristics are edited;<br />

• they include only the in-scope sub-universe while the final census totals include the full universe; and<br />

<strong>Post</strong> Enumeration <strong>Survey</strong> (<strong>PES</strong>)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!