06.09.2014 Views

N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process

N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process

N2O production in a single stage nitritation/anammox MBBR process

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10<br />

8<br />

DO concentration, pH & temperature<br />

35<br />

28<br />

DO (mg/l), pH<br />

6<br />

4<br />

21<br />

14<br />

Temp °C<br />

DO (mg/l)<br />

pH<br />

Temperature (°C)<br />

2<br />

7<br />

0<br />

0<br />

14/09/09<br />

19/09/09<br />

24/09/09<br />

29/09/09<br />

Date<br />

04/10/09<br />

09/10/09<br />

14/10/09<br />

19/10/09<br />

350<br />

Concentrations of <strong>in</strong>fluent and effluent total <strong>in</strong>organic nitrogen<br />

Total <strong>in</strong>organic nitrogen (mg/l)<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Σ TIN <strong>in</strong> (mg/l)<br />

Σ TIN out (mg/l)<br />

14/09/09<br />

19/09/09<br />

24/09/09<br />

29/09/09<br />

Date<br />

04/10/09<br />

09/10/09<br />

14/10/09<br />

19/10/09<br />

Removal rate (gN/m²d)<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

Removal rate (gN/m²d) & % reduction of <strong>in</strong>comm<strong>in</strong>g nitrogen<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

% reduction<br />

Removal rate<br />

(gN/m2d)<br />

% reduction<br />

14/09/09<br />

19/09/09<br />

24/09/09<br />

29/09/09<br />

Date<br />

04/10/09<br />

09/10/09<br />

14/10/09<br />

19/10/09<br />

Figure 14. Illustration of how the <strong>process</strong> performance changes with changed operation mode, The<br />

top graph illustrates DO dur<strong>in</strong>g the aerobe phase, pH and temperature. The second graph shows<br />

total concentration of <strong>in</strong>organic nitrogen <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluent feed and effluent water. The third graph<br />

shows the removal rate gN/m 2 d and the reduced nitrogen <strong>in</strong> %.<br />

4.3 <strong>N2O</strong> emissions from partial <strong>nitritation</strong>/<strong>anammox</strong> <strong>MBBR</strong><br />

The microsensor measured the <strong>N2O</strong> <strong>in</strong> the water phase dur<strong>in</strong>g different operation modes<br />

and aeration rates of the <strong>MBBR</strong>. The actual <strong>N2O</strong> <strong>production</strong> was not measured s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>N2O</strong><br />

left the water phase cont<strong>in</strong>uously through stripp<strong>in</strong>g and or by diffusion. However an<br />

estimation of the <strong>N2O</strong> <strong>production</strong> was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by measur<strong>in</strong>g the accumulation of the<br />

<strong>N2O</strong> directly after the airflow is turned off assum<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>N2O</strong> diffusion from water to air<br />

is negligible. If corrections for the <strong>N2O</strong> leav<strong>in</strong>g the reactor with the effluent water is<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!