25.09.2014 Views

INTRODUCTION TO ARCHAEOLOGY Nancy White - Touro Institute

INTRODUCTION TO ARCHAEOLOGY Nancy White - Touro Institute

INTRODUCTION TO ARCHAEOLOGY Nancy White - Touro Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

excavation must take place in the path of proposed construction. American archaeologists,<br />

especially those working in cultural resources management, differentiate among the levels of<br />

investigation as follows: Reconnaissance survey usually involves walking around the project<br />

area looking for surface materials and doing the historical background work to see what might<br />

have been there and what is already known or found. Phase I survey is more intensive and<br />

involves subsurface methods such as shovel testing and writing a more comprehensive report.<br />

Phase II test excavation may be done after survey has identified the sites in an area, to place<br />

formal test units at those sites suggested to be significant. Significance is often difficult to define.<br />

It can be understood in local to international terms. A significant site will have undisturbed<br />

cultural deposits that have good potential to produce new information about a past people. This<br />

usually includes features, good intact midden soils, diagnostic artifacts, and so on. An<br />

internationally significant site will usually be a major monument. Phase II excavation can even<br />

include stripping off disturbed soils with heavy equipment such as a front end-loader to see if<br />

undisturbed features such as refuse pits or house<br />

patterns are present below.<br />

Phase III excavations, also known as salvage or data<br />

recovery, might take place at the sites determined<br />

during Phase II to be significant but destined to be<br />

destroyed by whatever construction is planned. During<br />

Phase III more extensive excavation units are dug and<br />

as much information and material as possible is<br />

recovered, since this will be all that is retrieved from<br />

the site (usually) before it is gone. There is obviously<br />

the ethical consideration, again, of digging and thus<br />

destroying too much of a site if it is NOT destined to<br />

be disturbed or destroyed. Furthermore, it is always<br />

better to conserve instead of dig. Good cultural<br />

resources management strategies often involve<br />

working with those planning the construction to avoid<br />

site destruction. For example, after surveying and<br />

Phase II testing in the path of a housing development<br />

in Florida, we might find a few sites that are<br />

significant. We might persuade the developer to move<br />

planned buildings away from the site, change the<br />

design of the entire plan, or dump some loads of fill<br />

dirt over the site and preserve it as a park or green<br />

space, maybe even with an outdoor display describing<br />

the prehistoric people who once lived here (good public relations for the developer, as well!).<br />

Archaeological Classification and Analysis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!