INTRODUCTION TO ARCHAEOLOGY Nancy White - Touro Institute
INTRODUCTION TO ARCHAEOLOGY Nancy White - Touro Institute
INTRODUCTION TO ARCHAEOLOGY Nancy White - Touro Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
excavation must take place in the path of proposed construction. American archaeologists,<br />
especially those working in cultural resources management, differentiate among the levels of<br />
investigation as follows: Reconnaissance survey usually involves walking around the project<br />
area looking for surface materials and doing the historical background work to see what might<br />
have been there and what is already known or found. Phase I survey is more intensive and<br />
involves subsurface methods such as shovel testing and writing a more comprehensive report.<br />
Phase II test excavation may be done after survey has identified the sites in an area, to place<br />
formal test units at those sites suggested to be significant. Significance is often difficult to define.<br />
It can be understood in local to international terms. A significant site will have undisturbed<br />
cultural deposits that have good potential to produce new information about a past people. This<br />
usually includes features, good intact midden soils, diagnostic artifacts, and so on. An<br />
internationally significant site will usually be a major monument. Phase II excavation can even<br />
include stripping off disturbed soils with heavy equipment such as a front end-loader to see if<br />
undisturbed features such as refuse pits or house<br />
patterns are present below.<br />
Phase III excavations, also known as salvage or data<br />
recovery, might take place at the sites determined<br />
during Phase II to be significant but destined to be<br />
destroyed by whatever construction is planned. During<br />
Phase III more extensive excavation units are dug and<br />
as much information and material as possible is<br />
recovered, since this will be all that is retrieved from<br />
the site (usually) before it is gone. There is obviously<br />
the ethical consideration, again, of digging and thus<br />
destroying too much of a site if it is NOT destined to<br />
be disturbed or destroyed. Furthermore, it is always<br />
better to conserve instead of dig. Good cultural<br />
resources management strategies often involve<br />
working with those planning the construction to avoid<br />
site destruction. For example, after surveying and<br />
Phase II testing in the path of a housing development<br />
in Florida, we might find a few sites that are<br />
significant. We might persuade the developer to move<br />
planned buildings away from the site, change the<br />
design of the entire plan, or dump some loads of fill<br />
dirt over the site and preserve it as a park or green<br />
space, maybe even with an outdoor display describing<br />
the prehistoric people who once lived here (good public relations for the developer, as well!).<br />
Archaeological Classification and Analysis