WI Forward Award 2012 - Welcome to MATC - Milwaukee Area ...
WI Forward Award 2012 - Welcome to MATC - Milwaukee Area ...
WI Forward Award 2012 - Welcome to MATC - Milwaukee Area ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Focus: Category 3<br />
discrimination and/or harassment are investigated by <strong>MATC</strong>’s<br />
Human Resources office, which serves as the central intake point<br />
for all internal complaints of discrimination and/or harassment.<br />
During the complaint process, if there is probable cause that<br />
unlawful discrimination or harassment may have occurred,<br />
HR makes an effort <strong>to</strong> resolve the dispute through conciliation<br />
and consensus. If a resolution is not achieved through those<br />
processes, the office refers the matter <strong>to</strong> the appropriate <strong>MATC</strong><br />
department for disciplinary action or sanctions. If the findings<br />
show that there is no probable that discrimination or harassment<br />
occurred, HR dismisses the complaint. The individual is sent a<br />
Letter of Complaint Dismissal.<br />
The Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Student Life keeps a log of all student<br />
complaints while each division has systematically begun<br />
recording all academic complaints since 2011. In addition, a<br />
group of associate deans are working on ensuring consistency<br />
for all divisional student complaint procedures. The electronic<br />
Maxient system was employed for the daily reporting of safety<br />
and security events in 2010, including complaints. It is currently<br />
used <strong>to</strong> capture generic Public Safety concerns. At this time, no<br />
systematic way <strong>to</strong> follow up with complaints is enforced nor are<br />
they analyzed <strong>to</strong> help identify areas needed for improvement.<br />
However, individuals receive one-on-one attention with each<br />
complaint and subsequent follow up. This response and the<br />
clarity of the complaint processes help res<strong>to</strong>re the students’ or<br />
stakeholders’ confidence in <strong>MATC</strong>.<br />
Category 4: MEASURE, ANALYSIS & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT<br />
4.1. MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS, AND IMPROVEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE<br />
4.1.a(1) Performance Measures<br />
We have identified improving our use of data for decision-making and improvements as a strategic challenge. Figure 4-1a provides<br />
the overall improvement process now being followed in this area.<br />
Figure 4-1a: PDCA for Measurement, Analysis, & Knowledge Management<br />
(ACT)<br />
• Readjust data and project reporting based on changed<br />
specifications and feedback<br />
• Reassign project responsibilities as needed<br />
• Provide training <strong>to</strong> address staff needs / weaknesses<br />
• Gain approval for updated college dashboards and Project KPIs as<br />
performance measures<br />
(CHECK)<br />
• Send IRSP Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Service Evaluation <strong>to</strong> clients<br />
• Review project lists, loads and evaluations<br />
• Address critical or emergency client/college needs<br />
• Moni<strong>to</strong>r scheduling and success of projects and reports<br />
• Reassess college dashboards and KPIs for relevancy as part of annual updating<br />
CHECK<br />
ACT<br />
For tracking daily operations and overall organizational<br />
performance, <strong>MATC</strong> uses a newly implemented Datatel<br />
Dashboard system that has begun <strong>to</strong> transform, standardize,<br />
and improve our knowledge management system. The new<br />
software system provides the ability <strong>to</strong> develop reports based<br />
on a full range of easily accessible data that “talk with each<br />
other.” Progress on strategic planning goals and objectives as<br />
well as their Key Performance Indica<strong>to</strong>rs (KPIs) are tracked<br />
separately by IRSP. The indica<strong>to</strong>rs are created and moni<strong>to</strong>red in<br />
consultation with core committees of the Strategic Plan, and they<br />
are identified for all action projects within the annual Strategic<br />
Plan (Figure 2-1c).<br />
<strong>Area</strong>s of the college that had not been tracked or moni<strong>to</strong>red on a<br />
regular basis, had been unsystematically or partially tracked, or<br />
were moni<strong>to</strong>red through monthly hard copy or electronic reports<br />
DO<br />
PLAN<br />
(PLAN)<br />
• Review annual scheduling of projects and reporting<br />
• Prioritize projects and reporting<br />
• Align responsibilities with appropriate staff<br />
• Discuss relevant issues at bi-weekly IRSP and IT mtgs. and at quarterly<br />
IRSP/IT joint mtgs. for suggestions and assistance<br />
• Plan Operationalization for college dashboards and project KPIs and<br />
ACT<br />
for their accessibility<br />
CHECK<br />
(DO)<br />
• Review Project Design / Specifications tied <strong>to</strong> Federal / State<br />
Guidelines or <strong>to</strong> college / Client Needs<br />
• Implement Project; Collect / Manage Data, Systems, and Moni<strong>to</strong>r<br />
Accuracy and Progress<br />
• Conduct Analysis / Testing/ Data Clean-up<br />
• Write/ File Report and Present Finished Product <strong>to</strong> Clients<br />
• Populate and Present Data Elements for college dashboards and Project KPIs<br />
PLAN<br />
DO<br />
will now have greater transparency through the creation and<br />
updating of Finance, Human Resources, Student Enrollment and<br />
Financial Aid dashboards.<br />
Key performance measures vary depending on the college area.<br />
At the <strong>to</strong>p of the organization, key performance measures of<br />
institutional health are reported <strong>to</strong> the District Board monthly,<br />
based on annually-updated data concerning student success rates<br />
(Figures 7-1a through 7-1e), enrollment trends (Figure 7-2g) ,<br />
student retention and persistence (Figures 7-1f and 7-2f) employer<br />
and student satisfaction (Figures 7-1q and 7-1s), and program<br />
affordability. Additionally, performance on budgetary and financial<br />
indica<strong>to</strong>rs is provided <strong>to</strong> the District Board monthly (while those in<br />
charge of cost centers moni<strong>to</strong>r departmental performance monthly<br />
through electronically-shared reports). Examples of key measures<br />
include budgeted versus actuals for expenditures and revenues<br />
19