27.09.2014 Views

WI Forward Award 2012 - Welcome to MATC - Milwaukee Area ...

WI Forward Award 2012 - Welcome to MATC - Milwaukee Area ...

WI Forward Award 2012 - Welcome to MATC - Milwaukee Area ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Focus: Category 3<br />

discrimination and/or harassment are investigated by <strong>MATC</strong>’s<br />

Human Resources office, which serves as the central intake point<br />

for all internal complaints of discrimination and/or harassment.<br />

During the complaint process, if there is probable cause that<br />

unlawful discrimination or harassment may have occurred,<br />

HR makes an effort <strong>to</strong> resolve the dispute through conciliation<br />

and consensus. If a resolution is not achieved through those<br />

processes, the office refers the matter <strong>to</strong> the appropriate <strong>MATC</strong><br />

department for disciplinary action or sanctions. If the findings<br />

show that there is no probable that discrimination or harassment<br />

occurred, HR dismisses the complaint. The individual is sent a<br />

Letter of Complaint Dismissal.<br />

The Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Student Life keeps a log of all student<br />

complaints while each division has systematically begun<br />

recording all academic complaints since 2011. In addition, a<br />

group of associate deans are working on ensuring consistency<br />

for all divisional student complaint procedures. The electronic<br />

Maxient system was employed for the daily reporting of safety<br />

and security events in 2010, including complaints. It is currently<br />

used <strong>to</strong> capture generic Public Safety concerns. At this time, no<br />

systematic way <strong>to</strong> follow up with complaints is enforced nor are<br />

they analyzed <strong>to</strong> help identify areas needed for improvement.<br />

However, individuals receive one-on-one attention with each<br />

complaint and subsequent follow up. This response and the<br />

clarity of the complaint processes help res<strong>to</strong>re the students’ or<br />

stakeholders’ confidence in <strong>MATC</strong>.<br />

Category 4: MEASURE, ANALYSIS & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT<br />

4.1. MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS, AND IMPROVEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE<br />

4.1.a(1) Performance Measures<br />

We have identified improving our use of data for decision-making and improvements as a strategic challenge. Figure 4-1a provides<br />

the overall improvement process now being followed in this area.<br />

Figure 4-1a: PDCA for Measurement, Analysis, & Knowledge Management<br />

(ACT)<br />

• Readjust data and project reporting based on changed<br />

specifications and feedback<br />

• Reassign project responsibilities as needed<br />

• Provide training <strong>to</strong> address staff needs / weaknesses<br />

• Gain approval for updated college dashboards and Project KPIs as<br />

performance measures<br />

(CHECK)<br />

• Send IRSP Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Service Evaluation <strong>to</strong> clients<br />

• Review project lists, loads and evaluations<br />

• Address critical or emergency client/college needs<br />

• Moni<strong>to</strong>r scheduling and success of projects and reports<br />

• Reassess college dashboards and KPIs for relevancy as part of annual updating<br />

CHECK<br />

ACT<br />

For tracking daily operations and overall organizational<br />

performance, <strong>MATC</strong> uses a newly implemented Datatel<br />

Dashboard system that has begun <strong>to</strong> transform, standardize,<br />

and improve our knowledge management system. The new<br />

software system provides the ability <strong>to</strong> develop reports based<br />

on a full range of easily accessible data that “talk with each<br />

other.” Progress on strategic planning goals and objectives as<br />

well as their Key Performance Indica<strong>to</strong>rs (KPIs) are tracked<br />

separately by IRSP. The indica<strong>to</strong>rs are created and moni<strong>to</strong>red in<br />

consultation with core committees of the Strategic Plan, and they<br />

are identified for all action projects within the annual Strategic<br />

Plan (Figure 2-1c).<br />

<strong>Area</strong>s of the college that had not been tracked or moni<strong>to</strong>red on a<br />

regular basis, had been unsystematically or partially tracked, or<br />

were moni<strong>to</strong>red through monthly hard copy or electronic reports<br />

DO<br />

PLAN<br />

(PLAN)<br />

• Review annual scheduling of projects and reporting<br />

• Prioritize projects and reporting<br />

• Align responsibilities with appropriate staff<br />

• Discuss relevant issues at bi-weekly IRSP and IT mtgs. and at quarterly<br />

IRSP/IT joint mtgs. for suggestions and assistance<br />

• Plan Operationalization for college dashboards and project KPIs and<br />

ACT<br />

for their accessibility<br />

CHECK<br />

(DO)<br />

• Review Project Design / Specifications tied <strong>to</strong> Federal / State<br />

Guidelines or <strong>to</strong> college / Client Needs<br />

• Implement Project; Collect / Manage Data, Systems, and Moni<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Accuracy and Progress<br />

• Conduct Analysis / Testing/ Data Clean-up<br />

• Write/ File Report and Present Finished Product <strong>to</strong> Clients<br />

• Populate and Present Data Elements for college dashboards and Project KPIs<br />

PLAN<br />

DO<br />

will now have greater transparency through the creation and<br />

updating of Finance, Human Resources, Student Enrollment and<br />

Financial Aid dashboards.<br />

Key performance measures vary depending on the college area.<br />

At the <strong>to</strong>p of the organization, key performance measures of<br />

institutional health are reported <strong>to</strong> the District Board monthly,<br />

based on annually-updated data concerning student success rates<br />

(Figures 7-1a through 7-1e), enrollment trends (Figure 7-2g) ,<br />

student retention and persistence (Figures 7-1f and 7-2f) employer<br />

and student satisfaction (Figures 7-1q and 7-1s), and program<br />

affordability. Additionally, performance on budgetary and financial<br />

indica<strong>to</strong>rs is provided <strong>to</strong> the District Board monthly (while those in<br />

charge of cost centers moni<strong>to</strong>r departmental performance monthly<br />

through electronically-shared reports). Examples of key measures<br />

include budgeted versus actuals for expenditures and revenues<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!