PDF | 2 MB - Australian Building Codes Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

150 PROPOSAL TO REVISE ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING CODE OF AUSTRALIA FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS F.1 Impact on optimal HVAC capacity requirements — chillers (continued) Form H – school BAU 2010 BCA Reduction Cost savings Kw Kw % $/m2 Darwin 588 477 18.9 9.6 Brisbane 532 419 21.2 9.8 Mt Isa 554 450 18.7 9.0 Kalgoorlie 712 570 20.0 12.3 Sydney, Adelaide, Perth 446 489 -9.7 -3.7 Melbourne 541 423 21.7 10.2 Hobart, Canberra 409 335 18.0 6.4 Thredbo 285 249 12.8 3.2 Note: All figures in 2009 dollars; discount rate is 5 per cent real. Source: CIE estimates based on data provided by the ABCB. F.2 Impact on optimal HVAC capacity requirements — boilers Form 1 - office BAU 2010 BCA Reduction Cost savings kW kW % $/m2 Darwin 0 0 na 0.0 Brisbane 0 0 na 0.0 Mt Isa 0 0 na 0.0 Kalgoorlie 297 261 12.2 4.5 Sydney, Adelaide, Perth 236 217 8.0 2.4 Melbourne 249 222 10.8 3.4 Hobart, Canberra 209 184 11.8 3.1 Form 1 - retail Darwin 0 0 na 0.0 Brisbane 0 0 na 0.0 Mt Isa 0 0 na 0.0 Kalgoorlie 401 346 13.6 6.8 Sydney, Adelaide, Perth 333 278 16.5 6.9 Melbourne 356 280 21.4 9.5 Hobart, Canberra 333 262 21.4 8.9 (Continued on next page) www.TheCIE.com.au
PROPOSAL TO REVISE ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING CODE OF AUSTRALIA FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 151 F.2 Impact on optimal HVAC capacity requirements — boilers Form 2 - office BAU 2010 BCA Reduction Cost savings kW kW % $/m2 Darwin 37 31 15.6 0.7 Brisbane 34 28 17.4 0.7 Mt Isa 40 33 17.9 0.9 Kalgoorlie 42 32 24.5 1.3 Sydney, Adelaide, Perth 40 30 23.9 1.2 Melbourne 35 23 34.0 1.5 Hobart, Canberra 24 17 28.8 0.9 Thredbo 21 18 14.6 0.4 Form H - hospital Darwin 0 0 na 0.0 Brisbane 0 0 na 0.0 Mt Isa 0 0 na 0.0 Kalgoorlie 346 311 10.3 4.5 Sydney, Adelaide, Perth 256 244 4.8 1.5 Melbourne 283 267 5.8 2.1 Hobart, Canberra 262 270 -3.1 -1.0 Thredbo 352 345 2.2 1.0 Form H – school Darwin 250 248 0.9 0.3 Brisbane 434 391 10.0 5.5 Mt Isa 423 375 11.2 5.9 Kalgoorlie 717 575 19.8 17.8 Sydney, Adelaide, Perth 452 492 -8.9 -5.0 Melbourne 547 428 21.7 14.8 Hobart, Canberra 437 364 16.8 9.2 Thredbo 350 314 10.4 4.5 Note: All figures in 2009 dollars; discount rate is 5 per cent real. Source: CIE estimates based on data provided by the ABCB. www.TheCIE.com.au
Page 1 and 2:
CONSULTATION REGULATION IMPACT STA
Page 3 and 4:
The Centre for International Econom
Page 5 and 6:
PROPOSAL TO REVISE ENERGY EFFICIENC
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100: PROPOSAL TO REVISE ENERGY EFFICIENC
Page 101 and 102: PROPOSAL TO REVISE ENERGY EFFICIENC
Page 103: Appendices
Page 106 and 107: 106 PROPOSAL TO REVISE ENERGY EFFIC
Page 166: 166 PROPOSAL TO REVISE ENERGY EFFIC
show all

PDF | 2 MB - Australian Building Codes Board

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?