20.10.2014 Views

2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites

2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites

2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Tridacna spp.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> actions were proposed in the Solomon Islands aquaculture development plan<br />

(Ministry <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Marine Resources, 2009) which included maintaining a ban on the<br />

export <strong>of</strong> wild Tridacnidae and supporting production <strong>of</strong> hatchery-based clams on village<br />

farms.<br />

It was reported that between 1997-2001, over 60 000 Tridacnidae specimens (consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

T. gigas, T. derasa, T. squamosa, T. maxima, T. crocea and Hippopus hippopus) were exported<br />

from 25 village farms in the Solomon Islands (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Marine Resources,<br />

2009). However, the production <strong>of</strong> hatchery-reared individuals for grow-out on village<br />

farms was disrupted in 1999-2000 and 2000-2003 as a result <strong>of</strong> ethnic tensions<br />

(Ministry <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Marine Resources, 2009). The village farming systems were<br />

described as “simple, low-cost and low-input operations” (Hean and Cacho, 1999).<br />

More recently, Tridacnidae farming in Solomon Islands was reported to be supported by the<br />

WorldFish Center and funded by NZAID (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Marine Resources,<br />

2009). Farming activities were reported to concentrate on T. derasa, with plans to expand the<br />

production to cover other species as well (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Marine Resources, 2009).<br />

The export rates <strong>of</strong> aquaculture-produced specimens were expected to increase in the future,<br />

although the attractiveness <strong>of</strong> aquaculture production to private investors was considered<br />

limited due to conflicts related to the customary rules on sea access rights and ownership in<br />

Solomon Islands (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Marine Resources, 2009).<br />

C. Species reviews<br />

Tridacna crocea Lamarck, 1819: Solomon Islands.<br />

Biology: Tridacna crocea was reported to be the smallest Tridacna species (Rosewater, 1965),<br />

with a maximum length <strong>of</strong> 15 cm, although not usually exceeding 11 cm<br />

(Kinch and Teitelbaum, 2010). Hamner and Jones (1976) recorded annual growth rates <strong>of</strong><br />

2 cm in the first year and 1.5 cm in the second and third years, after which the growth rate<br />

was reported to decline.<br />

The species is typically found deeply burrowed in coral substrate, in lagoons that experience<br />

run<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> fresh water, and it appears to be well adapted to lower salinity levels<br />

(Hamner and Jones, 1976; Hart et al., 1998; Kinch and Teitelbaum, 2010). According to<br />

Kinch and Teitelbaum (2010), it is sometimes found in very shallow waters, and can occur in<br />

depths up to 20 m in clear waters.<br />

Distribution in range State: T. crocea has a wide distribution, ranging from Australia to<br />

Japan, and from Vanuatu to Indonesia (Mollusc Specialist Group, 1996).<br />

The species was considered widespread in the Solomon Islands (Govan, 1988; Wells, 1997),<br />

and has been found in reasonable numbers in most parts <strong>of</strong> the country (Hviding, 1993).<br />

However, in a 2004 survey <strong>of</strong> key invertebrate species conducted at 66 sites in the main<br />

island group <strong>of</strong> the Solomon Islands, excluding the remote islands and atolls, T. crocea was<br />

found at only 24 per cent <strong>of</strong> the studied sites, being significantly less frequent than T. maxima<br />

or T. squamosa (Ramohia, 2006).<br />

Population trends and status: T. crocea was categorised as Lower Risk/least concern in the<br />

IUCN Red List, although it was noted that the assessment needed updating<br />

(Mollusc Specialist Group, 1996). Wells (1997) described it as “reasonably abundant”<br />

throughout its range, although many populations in Southeast Asia were considered to be in<br />

decline.<br />

Within Solomon Islands, Hviding (1993) regarded it abundant and in some localities, very<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!