20.10.2014 Views

2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites

2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites

2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Huso huso<br />

2011, delegations <strong>of</strong> all five Caspian countries discussed a plan for a five year moratorium<br />

on harvest <strong>of</strong> all sturgeon species in the Caspian Sea (Sharov, 2011). The agenda <strong>of</strong> the<br />

32 nd session <strong>of</strong> the Commission, to be held in December 2011 was reported to include the<br />

issue <strong>of</strong> a moratorium on catching all species <strong>of</strong> sturgeon (R. Hajiyev in litt. to UNEP-<br />

WCMC, 2011).<br />

In 2006, the Caspian countries adopted the ‘Interstate Programme on the study <strong>of</strong> the<br />

distribution, abundance, stocks assessment, food supply and TAC determination <strong>of</strong> Caspian<br />

Sea sturgeons in 2007-2009’ (Anonymous, 2006, cited in Sharov, 2011). According to the<br />

Programme, the Caspian-wide trawl survey was defined as the principal method <strong>of</strong><br />

sturgeon stock assessment, with a total <strong>of</strong> 450 fixed stations sampled across the Caspian Sea<br />

during summertime (Sharov, 2011). All former Soviet Union member countries employ a<br />

fixed transect trawl survey, while Iran has adopted a stratified random survey design,<br />

following FAO’s recommendation (Sharov, 2011).<br />

Sturgeon stock assessment and total allowable catch (TAC) methodologies were reviewed<br />

for the Caspian range States at the 25 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the CITES Animals Committee (AC24<br />

Doc. 12.2; AC25 Doc. 16.2). The Committee concurred that current stock assessment methods<br />

were inadequate and agreed that insufficient sturgeon stock assessment expertise in the<br />

region and appropriate institutional structure to support such activities were major<br />

impediments to progress (AC25 Summary Record and a number <strong>of</strong> recommendations were<br />

made (AC25 WG4 Doc. 1; AC25 Summary Record; IISD, 2011).<br />

The immediate future <strong>of</strong> H. huso appears to be dependent upon restocking (Kottelat and<br />

Freyh<strong>of</strong>, 2007). However, the use <strong>of</strong> aquaculture and hatcheries to support wild populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> sturgeons has been subject to criticisms, including: the emphasis <strong>of</strong> hatchery output over<br />

fisheries management and reducing fishing mortality (Doukakis et al., 2010); difficulties in<br />

genetic management and lack <strong>of</strong> wild stock (Abdolhay, 2004; Doukakis et al., 2010);<br />

hatchery-reared specimens lacking homing fidelity (which is needed to find the natal river<br />

and also to arrive at the spawning site at the correct time) (Lagutov and Lagutov, 2008);<br />

issues with interactions between hatchery-reared fish and native populations (including<br />

genetic erosion, behavioural changes and the introduction <strong>of</strong> disease) (Abdolhay, 2004); low<br />

survival rates <strong>of</strong> fingerlings from some hatcheries (Lagutov and Lagutov, 2008); and the<br />

opportunity to launder illegally-obtained caviar in aquaculture operations (Sellar, 2006).<br />

C. Country reviews<br />

AZERBAIJAN<br />

Distribution in range State: The coastal waters <strong>of</strong> Azerbaijan were reported to be important<br />

winter feeding grounds for H. huso (CITES Management Authority <strong>of</strong> Azerbaijan, cited in<br />

TRAFFIC International et al., 2000). It was reported that sturgeons no longer used the Kura<br />

River and may be almost extinct (Khodorevskaya, 1997; Levin, 1997).<br />

Population trends and status: The CITES MA <strong>of</strong> Azerbaijan expressed concern over the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> H. huso stocks in the country noting poor natural reproduction and a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

spawners to contribute to the country's sturgeon hatcheries (R. Hajiyev in litt. to UNEP-<br />

WCMC, 2011). They reported a reduction in the quantity, average population mass and<br />

population replenishment, along with changes in the qualitative structure <strong>of</strong> the population<br />

(R. Hajiyev in litt. to UNEP-WCMC, 2011).<br />

A “considerable decline” in sturgeons throughout the region was attributed to overfishing,<br />

especially the selective catch <strong>of</strong> large spawning females and <strong>of</strong> smaller individuals with less<br />

commercial value within the quotas <strong>of</strong> hatcheries (WWF, 2010). Annual research trawl<br />

catches found two specimens in 2005, one in 2006 and no more until 2011, when one<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!