20.10.2014 Views

2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites

2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites

2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Balearica pavonina<br />

<strong>of</strong> the species required an <strong>of</strong>ficial licence. Tursha and Boyi (2011) noted that as it was the<br />

national bird <strong>of</strong> Nigeria, its hunting and killing were taboo.<br />

Elgood et al. (1994) stated that the Nigerian Government had adopted a conservation<br />

strategy addressing the threats to the species. According to Tréca (1996b), additional issues<br />

that needed addressing included the sustainable use <strong>of</strong> wetlands by local people and the<br />

ecological implications <strong>of</strong> large irrigation schemes in northern Nigeria.<br />

Tursha and Boyi (2011) called for efforts to combat trade in B. pavonina through effective<br />

monitoring <strong>of</strong> the borders between Nigeria, Chad and Cameroon by establishing stringent<br />

laws and prosecuting defaulters.<br />

SENEGAL<br />

Distribution in range State: The species was listed as breeding in the country (BirdLife<br />

International, 2011b). Populations were reported from the Lower Senegal River Basin<br />

(northwestern Senegal), the Casamance River (southwestern Senegal), and Upper Gambia<br />

River (southeastern Senegal) (Eljack, 1996; Williams et al., 2003). Tréca (1996a) also reported<br />

the species from Niokolo-Koba National Park (southeastern Senegal).<br />

Population trends and status: Estimates from 1985 and 1995 suggested population numbers<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1000 and 1000 – 2000 individuals (Urban, 1988; 1996). In surveys conducted in 2000 and<br />

2001, Williams et al. (2003) estimated the total population to be more than 1900 individuals,<br />

with some populations seemingly increasing, including at the Casamance River one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

strongholds <strong>of</strong> the species, whereas other populations were declining or had unknown<br />

population trends. Beilfuss et al. (2007) estimated a population size <strong>of</strong> 1900 individuals in<br />

2004. The overall population appeared to have stabilised during the last decades (Urban,<br />

1988; 1996; Williams et al., 2003).<br />

Threats: Habitat loss was considered to be the main threat to the species in Senegal,<br />

including through drought, dam construction, expansion <strong>of</strong> rice cultivation, possibly<br />

chemical spraying against locusts, and the destruction <strong>of</strong> Acacia nilotica trees (Tréca, 1996a;<br />

Eljack, 1996).<br />

<strong>Trade</strong>: According to data in the CITES <strong>Trade</strong> Database, trade originating in Senegal between<br />

2000 and 2010 consisted <strong>of</strong> four live, wild-sourced birds exported by Senegal in 2005 for<br />

commercial purposes; this trade was not reported by the importer. With the exception <strong>of</strong><br />

2010, all annual reports have been received from Senegal.<br />

Occasional capture and domestication has been reported (Eljack, 1996) although<br />

Tréca (1996a) stated that B. pavonina was not hunted or trapped for commercial trade.<br />

Management: B. pavonina was listed as a fully protected species in decree No. 86-866 on<br />

hunting and wildlife protection. The hunting, capturing, and collecting <strong>of</strong> eggs was<br />

prohibited, however it was noted that permits for hunt on the species could be issued when<br />

population numbers were high within a certain area. The species occurs in at least one<br />

protected area (see distribution section above).<br />

SIERRA LEONE<br />

Distribution in range State: The species was listed as vagrant (BirdLife International,<br />

2011b). Dowsett and Dowsett-Lemaire (1993) and Lepage (2011) considered the species to<br />

occur in Sierra Leone, although Williams et al. (2003) gave a population estimate <strong>of</strong> ‘none?’.<br />

No recent records <strong>of</strong> resident populations were available.<br />

Population trends and status: No population estimates were located. Meine and Archibald<br />

(1996) suspected that the population was extirpated.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!