2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites
2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites
2012. Review of Significant Trade - Cites
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Balearica pavonina<br />
<strong>of</strong> the species required an <strong>of</strong>ficial licence. Tursha and Boyi (2011) noted that as it was the<br />
national bird <strong>of</strong> Nigeria, its hunting and killing were taboo.<br />
Elgood et al. (1994) stated that the Nigerian Government had adopted a conservation<br />
strategy addressing the threats to the species. According to Tréca (1996b), additional issues<br />
that needed addressing included the sustainable use <strong>of</strong> wetlands by local people and the<br />
ecological implications <strong>of</strong> large irrigation schemes in northern Nigeria.<br />
Tursha and Boyi (2011) called for efforts to combat trade in B. pavonina through effective<br />
monitoring <strong>of</strong> the borders between Nigeria, Chad and Cameroon by establishing stringent<br />
laws and prosecuting defaulters.<br />
SENEGAL<br />
Distribution in range State: The species was listed as breeding in the country (BirdLife<br />
International, 2011b). Populations were reported from the Lower Senegal River Basin<br />
(northwestern Senegal), the Casamance River (southwestern Senegal), and Upper Gambia<br />
River (southeastern Senegal) (Eljack, 1996; Williams et al., 2003). Tréca (1996a) also reported<br />
the species from Niokolo-Koba National Park (southeastern Senegal).<br />
Population trends and status: Estimates from 1985 and 1995 suggested population numbers<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1000 and 1000 – 2000 individuals (Urban, 1988; 1996). In surveys conducted in 2000 and<br />
2001, Williams et al. (2003) estimated the total population to be more than 1900 individuals,<br />
with some populations seemingly increasing, including at the Casamance River one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
strongholds <strong>of</strong> the species, whereas other populations were declining or had unknown<br />
population trends. Beilfuss et al. (2007) estimated a population size <strong>of</strong> 1900 individuals in<br />
2004. The overall population appeared to have stabilised during the last decades (Urban,<br />
1988; 1996; Williams et al., 2003).<br />
Threats: Habitat loss was considered to be the main threat to the species in Senegal,<br />
including through drought, dam construction, expansion <strong>of</strong> rice cultivation, possibly<br />
chemical spraying against locusts, and the destruction <strong>of</strong> Acacia nilotica trees (Tréca, 1996a;<br />
Eljack, 1996).<br />
<strong>Trade</strong>: According to data in the CITES <strong>Trade</strong> Database, trade originating in Senegal between<br />
2000 and 2010 consisted <strong>of</strong> four live, wild-sourced birds exported by Senegal in 2005 for<br />
commercial purposes; this trade was not reported by the importer. With the exception <strong>of</strong><br />
2010, all annual reports have been received from Senegal.<br />
Occasional capture and domestication has been reported (Eljack, 1996) although<br />
Tréca (1996a) stated that B. pavonina was not hunted or trapped for commercial trade.<br />
Management: B. pavonina was listed as a fully protected species in decree No. 86-866 on<br />
hunting and wildlife protection. The hunting, capturing, and collecting <strong>of</strong> eggs was<br />
prohibited, however it was noted that permits for hunt on the species could be issued when<br />
population numbers were high within a certain area. The species occurs in at least one<br />
protected area (see distribution section above).<br />
SIERRA LEONE<br />
Distribution in range State: The species was listed as vagrant (BirdLife International,<br />
2011b). Dowsett and Dowsett-Lemaire (1993) and Lepage (2011) considered the species to<br />
occur in Sierra Leone, although Williams et al. (2003) gave a population estimate <strong>of</strong> ‘none?’.<br />
No recent records <strong>of</strong> resident populations were available.<br />
Population trends and status: No population estimates were located. Meine and Archibald<br />
(1996) suspected that the population was extirpated.<br />
26