22.10.2014 Views

Kanyarukiga - JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE - Refworld

Kanyarukiga - JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE - Refworld

Kanyarukiga - JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE - Refworld

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Judgement and Sentence 1 November 2010<br />

469. Defence Witnesses Mutume, Sibomana, KG45 and Tugirumukiza testified that they saw that<br />

<strong>Kanyarukiga</strong>’s pharmacy was closed on 15 April 1994. 1298 Each of these witnesses testified that<br />

they knew who <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> was. 1299 The Chamber notes that two of these witnesses were young<br />

and lived close to <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> in April 1994, but aside from this fact, the Chamber sees no reason<br />

to discount the evidence of Witnesses Mutume, Sibomana, and Tugirumukiza with regard to the<br />

closure of <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong>’s pharmacy. The Chamber note, however, it has found that Witness KG45<br />

not credible in its discussion of alibi. 1300<br />

470. Thus, given Witnesses CDK and CNJ’s evidence is uncorroborated and also partially<br />

contradicted by the Defence evidence, the Chamber finds that it has not been established beyond<br />

reasonable doubt that wounded assailants were treated at <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong>’s pharmacy.<br />

471. Witness CDK provided evidence that he heard the Accused say to the attackers at Nyange<br />

Church on 15 April 1994 that they had to fight the inyenzi, which the witness testified was a<br />

reference to the Tutsi in the church. 1301 Witness CDK also gave evidence that <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong><br />

approached the witness and those he was with and asked them to prepare and collect stones so they<br />

would be able to fight the Tutsi who had also gathered stones to attack. 1302 The Chamber notes that<br />

Witness CDK also testified that during the day of 15 April 1994, he saw the Accused moving<br />

amongst the members of the population “giving them instructions” and in the company of<br />

Kayishema and Ndahimana. 1303 These pieces of evidence are not corroborated by any other witness.<br />

The Chamber recalls that Witness CDK is one of the five Prosecution witnesses who were<br />

incarcerated together, the credibility of whom the Chamber has considered earlier in its<br />

deliberations. Given the Chamber has found that it cannot rely on this witness without corroboration<br />

from other credible evidence, the Chamber does not find it established, beyond reasonable doubt<br />

that <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> said to the attackers that they had to fight the inyenzi or that <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> was<br />

giving instructions to the attackers.<br />

472. Witness CBR testified that <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> was with Ndahimana when Ndahimana stated that<br />

the attackers were to “start working” and “begin work”, which was understood to mean “kill the<br />

Tutsi”. 1304 The Chamber notes its discussion of this witness and his credibility in paragraphs 591 to<br />

595. Given the Chamber’s view that Witness CBR is generally credible, it finds it established that<br />

<strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> was with Ndahimana when he asked the attackers to “start working” or “begin work”.<br />

473. Witness CDK recounted that he saw <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> speaking to Rukara prior to the grenade<br />

being thrown. After this discussion, a ladder was found and Rukara used this ladder to climb on top<br />

of <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong>’s pharmacy and subsequently Rukara threw a grenade, which resulted in Tutsi<br />

“losses”. 1305 The Chamber recalls that Witness CDK was an accomplice to the attacks on<br />

15 April 1994 and has therefore treated his evidence with caution. The Chamber further notes that<br />

there is no direct corroboration of Witness CDK’s testimony. While Witness CNJ provided some<br />

support for Witness CDK’s evidence when he testified that he saw <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> at the Statue of the<br />

1298 Witness Mutume, T. 27 January 2010, p. 31; Witness Sibomana, T. 1 February 2010, p. 30; Witness Tugirumukiza,<br />

T. 1 February 2010, p. 57. Witness KG45 testified to <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong>’s pharmacy being closed from 14 April to 21 or 22<br />

April 1994. T. 21 January 2010, pp. 60-62, 70, 71 (CS).<br />

1299 Witness Mutume testified that he lived near <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> in Gaseke cellule in Ngobagoba secteur and has known<br />

<strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> since he was young. T. 27 January 2010, p. 27. Witness Sibomana testified that he has known<br />

<strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> since he was young. T. 1 February 2010, p. 26. Witness Tugirumukiza also testified that he has known<br />

<strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> since the witness was young. T. 1 February 2010, p. 52.<br />

1300 See discussion at paragraphs 126 to 129.<br />

1301 T. 16 September 2009, p. 7.<br />

1302 T. 16 September 2009, p. 6.<br />

1303 T. 16 September 2009, pp. 6, 7-8.<br />

1304 T. 9 September 2009, pp. 18-19, 22-23.<br />

1305 T. 16 September 2009, p. 6.<br />

The Prosecutor v. Gaspard <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong>, Case No. ICTR-2002-78-T 113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!