Kanyarukiga - JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE - Refworld
Kanyarukiga - JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE - Refworld
Kanyarukiga - JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE - Refworld
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Judgement and Sentence 1 November 2010<br />
(Presiding), Sergei Alekseevich Egorov and Florence Rita Arrey, to consider the Prosecutor’s<br />
request for transfer under Rule 11 bis. 1817<br />
695. On 6 June 2008, the Chamber denied the Prosecution’s request to refer <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong>’s case<br />
to the Republic of Rwanda. 1818<br />
696. On 23 June 2008, the Prosecution filed a Notice of Appeal from the Trial Chamber’s denial<br />
of its request for transfer under Rule 11 bis. 1819 On 24 June 2008, the Presiding Judge of the<br />
Appeals Chamber assigned Judges Fausto Pocar (Presiding), Mohamed Shahabuddeen, Mehmet<br />
Güney, Liu Daqun and Andrésia Vaz to hear the appeal. 1820<br />
697. On 2 September 2008, the Appeals Chamber granted a request from the Republic of Rwanda<br />
for leave to appear as amicus curiae and ordered Rwanda to file its brief within 10 days of the filing<br />
of the Chamber’s decision. 1821 The Appeals Chamber also dismissed two Defence motions for leave<br />
to file additional evidence pursuant to Rule 115 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. 1822<br />
698. On 30 October 2008, the Appeals Chamber dismissed the Prosecution’s appeal against the<br />
Trial Chamber’s Rule 11 bis decision and upheld the Trial Chamber’s decision to deny the request<br />
for referral to Rwanda. 1823<br />
3. Pre-Trial Phase<br />
699. On 9 November 2004, the Pre-Trial Chamber granted in part a Defence motion requesting<br />
that all documents in the case be translated into Kinyarwanda, the only language understood by the<br />
Accused. 1824 The Chamber ordered that all evidentiary material relating to the determination of<br />
charges, including prior witness statements, and all decisions and orders of the Chambers, be<br />
translated into Kinyarwanda for the benefit of the Accused. 1825<br />
700. On 29 November 2004, the Pre-Trial Chamber denied a Defence motion to join<br />
<strong>Kanyarukiga</strong>’s case with that of Accused Athanase Seromba (Case No. ICTR-2001-66-T). 1826<br />
701. On 3 June 2005, the Pre-Trial Chamber granted in part a Prosecution motion for witness<br />
protective measures. 1827<br />
1817 Designation of a Trial Chamber for the Referral of the Case of Gaspard <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> to Rwanda (TC), 2 October<br />
2007.<br />
1818 Decision on Prosecutor’s Request for Referral to the Republic of Rwanda (TC), 6 June 2008. On 19 June 2008, the<br />
Chamber denied as moot a Defence motion to file additional evidence in support of its response to the Prosecution’s<br />
request for referral. Decision on Defence Motion to Admit Additional Evidence (TC), 19 June 2008.<br />
1819 Prosecutor’s Notice of Appeal, filed 23 June 2008.<br />
1820 Order Assigning Judges to a Case before the Appeals Chamber (AC), 24 June 2008.<br />
1821 Decision on Request from the Republic of Rwanda for Permission to File an Amicus Curiae Brief (AC), 2<br />
September 2008.<br />
1822 Decision on Request to Admit Additional Evidence of 18 July 2008 (AC), 2 September 2008; Decision on Request<br />
to Admit Additional Evidence of 1 August 2008 (AC), 2 September 2008.<br />
1823 Decision on the Prosecution’s Appeal against Decision on Referral Under Rule 11 bis (AC), 30 October 2008.<br />
1824 Decision on the Defence Request for Kinyarwanda Translations of All Documents (TC), 9 November 2004.<br />
1825 Decision on the Defence Request for Kinyarwanda Translations of All Documents (TC), 9 November 2004, para. 5.<br />
1826 Décision Relative À La Requête de Gaspard <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong> en Jonction et en Suspension de Procès (TC), 29<br />
Novembre 2004.<br />
1827 Decision on Prosecution Motion for Protective Measures (TC), 3 June 2005. The Chamber ordered that protective<br />
measures be granted for all witnesses mentioned in the Prosecution motion but rejected requests from the Prosecution to<br />
delay disclosing witness identities to the Defence until 21 days prior to their testimony (rolling disclosure) and to share<br />
protected information with the Accused only in the presence of Defence Counsel. Decision on Prosecution Motion for<br />
Protective Measures (TC), 3 June 2005, paras. 4-5.<br />
The Prosecutor v. Gaspard <strong>Kanyarukiga</strong>, Case No. ICTR-2002-78-T 172