26.10.2014 Views

Review of Austrian Economics - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

Review of Austrian Economics - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

Review of Austrian Economics - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Austrian</strong> <strong>Economics</strong>, Vol. 5. No. 2<br />

soldiers led some <strong>of</strong> them to revise their estimates <strong>of</strong> unemployment<br />

upward. For example, on September 1 Business Week predicted GNP<br />

in 1946 would be 20 percent below the 1944 levels and that unemployment<br />

would peak "closer to 9,000,000 than 8,000,000." 30 <strong>The</strong><br />

9,000,000 figure represented about 14 percent <strong>of</strong> the projected civilian<br />

labor force.<br />

Businessmen and Wall Street did not listen to the economists.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Standard and Poor Industrial stock index rose more than 30<br />

percent from the fall <strong>of</strong> 1945 to the fall <strong>of</strong> 1946. As one commentary<br />

put it, "the simple fact is that the transition from war to peace<br />

production isn't proving too rough." 31 As early as September 1945,<br />

Business Week was revising its estimate <strong>of</strong> unemployment for the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1945 down to 4.0 to 4.5 million from 6.0 million. 32 A CED survey <strong>of</strong><br />

top businessmen predicted relatively high employment levels, with<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> jobs to rise 24 percent above the 1940 level and only<br />

12 percent below the wartime peak. 33<br />

Still, even in December 1945 economists were predicting that<br />

"depression is just around the corner." Robert Nathan predicted six<br />

million unemployed by the spring <strong>of</strong> 1946, implying an unemployment<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> 10 percent. 34 Veteran Department <strong>of</strong> Labor economist<br />

Isidore Lubin decided, in Business Week's opinion, to "play in safe,"<br />

predicting a wide range; six to nine million unemployed. 35 Even the<br />

minimum estimate turned out overly pessimistic by nearly a factor<br />

<strong>of</strong> three.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Revised Keynesian Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Reconversion<br />

Yet within a year <strong>of</strong> the war's end, it was clear that the pessimistic<br />

predictions were spectacularly wrong. Accordingly, economists<br />

rushed to put a new interpretation on events consistent with the new<br />

Keynesian theology that became deeply instilled in many <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

<strong>The</strong> postwar prosperity (they did not have the benefit <strong>of</strong> the statistics<br />

in the 1990 Economic Report <strong>of</strong> the President) was attributed to<br />

pent-up demand. In December 1946, the first report <strong>of</strong> the newly<br />

created Council <strong>of</strong> Economic Advisers, drafted primarily by Edwin<br />

Nourse, was representative <strong>of</strong> the new interpretation: "We have a<br />

postponed consumer demand, enterpriser ambitions, and purchasing<br />

^Business Week, September 1, 1945, p. 9.<br />

31 Business Week, September 15, 1945, p. 9.<br />

^Business Week, September 29, 1945, p. 9.<br />

33 New York Times, September 10, 1945, p. 32, col.3 .<br />

^Business Week, December 27, 1945, p. 10.<br />

35 Ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!