26.10.2014 Views

Review of Austrian Economics - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

Review of Austrian Economics - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

Review of Austrian Economics - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Austrian</strong> Capital and Interest<br />

<strong>The</strong>ory: Wieser's Contribution<br />

and the Menger Tradition<br />

A. M. Endres*<br />

Doctrinal investigation has now established that fundamental<br />

theoretical points <strong>of</strong> divergence separated the founder <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Austrian</strong> economics tradition, Carl Menger, and another<br />

leading <strong>Austrian</strong> economist, Eugen <strong>von</strong> Bohm-Bawerk. Bohm-<br />

Bawerk's capital and interest theory, in particular, stressed a degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> classical materiality and adopted a level <strong>of</strong> aggregation sharply in<br />

conflict with the basis <strong>of</strong> Menger's contribution (Endres 1987). As<br />

Streissler and Weber (1973, p. 231) speculate: "Bohm-Bawerk's Menger<br />

cannot be the whole Menger." Menger's successor in the chair <strong>of</strong><br />

economics in Vienna was Friedrich Wieser. 1 On the occasion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

centenary <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> Wieser's principal contributions to economic<br />

theory—Natural Value (1889)—the time seems apposite to assess<br />

whether, and to what extent, the economic-theoretic legacy <strong>of</strong> Carl<br />

Menger endured in Wieser's work. 2 Standard renditions <strong>of</strong> early<br />

<strong>Austrian</strong> economics in history <strong>of</strong> economic thought textbooks usually<br />

suggest that Wieser's work can be placed squarely in the Menger<br />

tradition. 3 Indeed, going from Wieser's (1923) biographical account <strong>of</strong><br />

Menger and from Wieser's (1891) survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>Austrian</strong> value theory, we<br />

should not be led to suspect otherwise. 4 However, Wieser's place in<br />

furthering the tradition <strong>of</strong> economic theory begun by Menger is<br />

*A. M. Endres is senior lecturer <strong>of</strong> economics at the University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, New<br />

Zealand.<br />

For two recent general appreciations <strong>of</strong> Wieser and his work see Streissler 1986<br />

and 1987.<br />

2 Wieser 1889 was an elaboration and refinement <strong>of</strong> Wieser 1884. <strong>The</strong> latter is<br />

well-known for introducing the equi-marginal principle into the theory <strong>of</strong> production<br />

and for its subjective cost theory.<br />

3 For example, Hutchison (1953, p. 153) argues that Wieser (1889) bears "strong<br />

family resemblances to Menger's Grundsatze." Rothschild (1973, p. 209) is <strong>of</strong> the view<br />

that "Wieser built on his [Menger's] foundations."<br />

See also the "Preface" in Wieser (1889, especially pp. xxxiv-xxxv).<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Austrian</strong> <strong>Economics</strong>, Vol. 5, No. 1 (1991): 67-90<br />

ISSN 0889-3047<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!