susref - Construction IT research at VTT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SUSREF 45 (57) INT. EXT. 15 115 130 For example:130 mm INT. EXT. 400 - 1000 mm. For example: 400 – 1000 mm Insulated load bearing cavity (brick, cavity, concrete block façade) Small houses Terraced houses Multi storey For example: Cfb, Cfa, Cfbw REFURBISHED WALL Alternative insulation types and thicknesses For example: Rockwool, Glass wool, Polyurethane Polystyrene…etc Alternative facade types like concrete, natural stone, polymer, rendering PV panel (?) wooden …etc panel Non-load bearing cavity (hollow brick + perforated brick or hollow brick + concrete block) INT. Etc. 15 70 40 255 115 15 EXT. Small houses Multi storey Cfb, Cfbw Cfa, REFURBISHED WALL Alternative insulation types and thicknesses Rockwool, Glass wool, Polyurethane Polystyrene..etc Different facade types like concrete, natural stone, polymer rendering PV panel (?) wooden panel...etc DESCRIPTION
SUSREF 46 (57) External insulation on top of existing structure: • alternatives according to the condition of the existing structure (needs for strengthening an old outer layer, for example in concrete case: outer concrete should be bolted to inner layer or in the case of brick: brick outer layer should be first rendered or other) • new insulation is fixed on old outer surface • new outer layer installed Other alternatives • Fixing mechanisms • Existence of air cavity • Quality and performance properties of materials • Quality of insulation material • Thickness of insulation and other layers • Existence of tight layers • Quality of surface material • Rainfalls, temperatures INFORMATION ABOUT THE PARAMETRES TO BE TESTED 1. Durability (focus on moisture), 2. Need for care and maintenance 3. Indoor air quality and 4. Impact on energy demand for heating 5. Impact on energy demand for cooling 6. Impact on renewable energy use potential (use of solar panels etc.) 7. Environmental impact of manufacture and maintenance 8. Life cycle costs 9. Aesthetic quality 10. Effect on cultural heritage 11. Structural stability 12. Fire safety 13. Buildability 14. Disturbance to the tenants and to the site 15. Impact on daylight All partners who are responsible will list the approach and needed parameters.
Page 1 and 2: SUSREF Sustainable Refurbishment of
Page 3 and 4: SUSREF 2 (57) 3.6.3 Insulating with
Page 5 and 6: SUSREF 2 (57) 2. Objectives The mai
Page 7 and 8: SUSREF 4 (57) Non-load bearing cavi
Page 9 and 10: SUSREF 6 (57) Table 1, Different pl
Page 11 and 12: SUSREF 8 (57) 3.3 Technologies for
Page 13 and 14: SUSREF 10 (57) 3.4.3 Different conc
Page 15 and 16: SUSREF 12 (57) Image 4. Example of
Page 17 and 18: SUSREF 14 (57) In one example syste
Page 19 and 20: SUSREF 16 (57) 3.5.3 Different conc
Page 21 and 22: SUSREF 18 (57) Image 11. Insulation
Page 23 and 24: SUSREF 20 (57) 3.6.1 Thermal bridge
Page 25 and 26: SUSREF 22 (57) Image 20, filling th
Page 27 and 28: SUSREF 24 (57) Following image show
Page 29 and 30: SUSREF 26 (57) Image 21. Cross-sect
Page 31 and 32: SUSREF 28 (57) Image 24. Spots gree
Page 33 and 34: SUSREF 30 (57) Image 27. Climatic s
Page 35 and 36: SUSREF 32 (57) The PV façades are
Page 37 and 38: SUSREF 34 (57) The solar collectors
Page 39 and 40: SUSREF 36 (57) This system requires
Page 41 and 42: SUSREF 38 (57) 3.8.7.1 Application
Page 43 and 44: SUSREF 40 (57) Image 42. Solar wall
Page 45 and 46: SUSREF 42 (57) Image 46. Solar chim
Page 47: SUSREF 44 (57) 4.1 External insulat
Page 51 and 52: SUSREF 48 (57) Other alternatives
Page 53 and 54: SUSREF 50 (57) • … INFORMATION
Page 55 and 56: SUSREF 52 (57) Small houses Dfb, Df
Page 57 and 58: SUSREF 54 (57) 5. References Almusa
Page 59 and 60: SUSREF Sustainable Refurbishment of
Page 61 and 62: Some mechanisms are impossible to p
Page 63 and 64: (source: Weber Saint Gobain) (sourc
Page 65 and 66: Image 5. Humidity of an un-insulate
Page 67 and 68: in four principal directions. The r
Page 69 and 70: For the detailed study, the case 1.
Page 71 and 72: Image 12. Relative humidity of moni
Page 73 and 74: In case of mineral wool insulation,
Page 75 and 76: 1.1.2.2 Replacement of original the
Page 77 and 78: Table 3. The maximum possible leaki
Page 79 and 80: Image 21. Un-insulated wall (left)
Page 81 and 82: Image 24. Performance of a solid wa
Page 83 and 84: 3.2.1 (E1) 100 mm MW + thin renderi
Page 85 and 86: Image 28. Water leakage points of d
Page 87 and 88: Image 32. Moisture and temperatures
Page 89 and 90: Image 36. Water leakage point in a
Page 91 and 92: 1.4 Krakow Int.EPS 0.00% 147.16 3.8
Page 93 and 94: case with actual material propertie
Page 95 and 96: Table 10. Different refurbishment m
Page 97 and 98: - EPS or PUR foam on inner surface
Page 99 and 100:
V cap is volume of all capillary po
Page 101 and 102:
Mould growth Numerical simulation o
Page 103 and 104:
uptake, the evaporation of water va
Page 105 and 106:
1.1.4.6 Case study 1: Jyväskylä (
Page 107 and 108:
The condition and the expected rema
Page 109 and 110:
Image 46. Results for the PUR refur
Page 111 and 112:
MW or PUR MW Image 48. Refurbished
Page 113 and 114:
ESP Image 51. Original unrefurbishe
Page 115 and 116:
Corrosion (relative to LS) 1,0 0,9
Page 117 and 118:
The time of refurbishment is the ti
Page 119 and 120:
The monitoring points of carbonatio
Page 121 and 122:
Mould Growth Index 6 5 4 3 2 1 Orig
Page 123 and 124:
1.1.4.13 Variables in the analyses
Page 125 and 126:
after the risk period is a result o
Page 127 and 128:
1.1.4.15 References Fagerlund, G. 1
Page 129 and 130:
SUSREF 2 (11) temperature is actual
Page 131 and 132:
SUSREF 4 (11) HDD A ( U ref U ren
Page 133 and 134:
SUSREF 6 (11) Q H Q Q (3) losses
Page 135 and 136:
SUSREF 8 (11) 2 Significant improve
Page 137 and 138:
SUSREF 10 (11) Table 9. Effect of I
Page 139 and 140:
SUSREF 1 (9) Deliverable: D4.2 - Ge
Page 141 and 142:
SUSREF 3 (9) Paris Month CDD_4h CDD
Page 143 and 144:
SUSREF 5 (9) The results show that,
Page 145 and 146:
SUSREF 7 (9) 3 EPS 0.05 0.039 4 hol
Page 147 and 148:
SUSREF 9 (9) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Page 149 and 150:
SUSREF 2(19) Arrays are most often
Page 151 and 152:
SUSREF 4(19) Figure 2. Solar electr
Page 153 and 154:
SUSREF 6(19) North facing Electrici
Page 155 and 156:
SUSREF 8(19) London Electricity pro
Page 157 and 158:
SUSREF 10(19) 1.4 Discussion For fi
Page 159 and 160:
SUSREF 12(19) Figure 12. Solar ther
Page 161 and 162:
SUSREF 14(19) Solar fraction of DHW
Page 163 and 164:
SUSREF 16(19) Solar fraction of DHW
Page 165 and 166:
SUSREF 18(19) 3 PVT Photovoltaic an
Page 167 and 168:
SUSREF Sustainable Refurbishment of
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
SUSREF 1 (13) Deliverable: D4.2 Tit
Page 207 and 208:
SUSREF 3 (13) Extra Insulation mate
Page 209 and 210:
SUSREF 5 (13) Life cycle costs - Ca
Page 211 and 212:
SUSREF 7 (13) Sandwich E2-LCC (eur/
Page 213 and 214:
SUSREF 9 (13) Solid concrete E1-LCC
Page 215 and 216:
SUSREF 11 (13) Summary and conclusi
Page 217 and 218:
SUSREF 13 (13) Künzel Helmut, Kün
Page 219 and 220:
SUSREF 2 (10) Evaluation criteria:
Page 221 and 222:
SUSREF 4 (10) W1_Solid wall; Brick,
Page 223 and 224:
SUSREF 6 (10) W5_Insulated load bea
Page 225 and 226:
SUSREF 8 (10) Thick noncombustible
Page 227 and 228:
SUSREF 10 (10) Combustible -2
Page 229 and 230:
2 (14) refurbishment on the individ
Page 231 and 232:
4 (14) aggravation indoor air) incr
Page 233 and 234:
6 (14) 1.2.2 Air quality Air qualit
Page 235 and 236:
8 (14) Ventilation efficiency -2 th
Page 237 and 238:
10 (14) If existing wall has infect
Page 239 and 240:
12 (14) 1.5.3 Acoustics The effect
Page 241 and 242:
14 (14) 1.6.3 Acoustics The replace
Page 243 and 244:
Mardjalevic & Rogers, 2006) 2 . In
Page 245 and 246:
Figure 3: Example room to be simula
Page 247 and 248:
For Helsinki: Facade Orientation Ea
Page 249 and 250:
For Bilbao: Facade Orientation East
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
3 (18) be removal of cladding, impr
Page 255 and 256:
5 (18) 2 Significant improvement or
Page 257 and 258:
7 (18) 3. External insulation (E) 3
Page 259 and 260:
9 (18) Dfb Dfc 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1
Page 261 and 262:
11 (18) Cfb Cfbw Csa Dfb Dfc 2 2 2
Page 263 and 264:
13 (18) Cfb - temperate withou
Page 265 and 266:
15 (18) Dfb - cold, without dry s
Page 267 and 268:
17 (18) Dfc - cold, without dry se
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
3 (3) 5. Cavity insulation Cavity i
Page 273 and 274:
2 (40) Easiness of maintenance (ex
Page 275 and 276:
4 (40) Figure 2.1.1. Solid wall - d
Page 277 and 278:
6 (40) 2.2 Sandwich elements made w
Page 279 and 280:
8 (40) Table 2.2.2. Vulnerability t
Page 281 and 282:
10 (40) Maintenance procedures and
Page 283 and 284:
Figure 2.4.1. Left: Load bearing ca
Page 285 and 286:
14 (40) Table 2.4.2. Vulnerability
Page 287 and 288:
16 (40) Dirt and microbial growth.
Page 289 and 290:
18 (40) Table 3.1.1.2. Vulnerabilit
Page 291 and 292:
20 (40) Table 3.1.1.3 Continued. Th
Page 293 and 294:
Figure 3.1.2.2. Retrofitting extern
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
26 (40) Table 3.1.2.3 Continued. Th
Page 299 and 300:
28 (40) Figure 3.1.3.1 Brick veneer
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
32 (40) 3.2 Internal insulation On
Page 305 and 306:
34 (40) Table 3.2.2. The effects on
Page 307 and 308:
36 (40) Table 3.3.1. Vulnerability
Page 309 and 310:
38 (40) 5. Bibliography Askeland A
Page 311 and 312:
Zirkelbach D Influence ogf temperat
Page 313 and 314:
Form. Strictly speaking, form deser
Page 315 and 316:
The thermal environment also includ
Page 317 and 318:
It is important to identify the cha
Page 319:
4. References Heschong, L. (1980).
show all

susref - Construction IT research at VTT

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?