February 27, 2012 - IMM@BUCT
February 27, 2012 - IMM@BUCT
February 27, 2012 - IMM@BUCT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
C&EN TALKS WITH<br />
PENNY CHISHOLM<br />
MIT BIOLOGIST discusses the benefits of public outreach<br />
CRAIG BETTENHAUSEN , C&EN WASHINGTON<br />
PROCHLOROCOCCUS is the smallest<br />
cell on the planet that can harvest<br />
energy directly from the sun. This tiny<br />
marine cyanobacterium, less than<br />
1 µm across, represents a huge portion<br />
of the ocean biomass; an estimated<br />
10 <strong>27</strong> of them roam the oceans. Yet scientists<br />
were unaware of Prochlorococcus<br />
until 1985, when Massachusetts Institute<br />
of Technology biologist Sallie<br />
W. (Penny) Chisholm and colleagues<br />
from Woods Hole Oceanographic<br />
Institution spotted a chlorophyll<br />
fluorescence coming from a tiny cell<br />
careening through the capillary tube<br />
of their flow cytometry apparatus. The discovery begat a sea change<br />
in the understanding of the ocean’s food web.<br />
In addition to its outsized role in the ecosystem, Prochlorococcus<br />
also has the smallest genome of any O 2 -evolving organism, at around<br />
2,000 genes. The portion that codes for the photosynthetic machinery—1,200<br />
genes that are conserved across the many different<br />
strains—composes the most succinct genetic picture of photosynthesis<br />
available. But even 26 years after the discovery of Prochlorococcus<br />
, though the organisms “contribute a significant fraction of global<br />
photosynthesis,” Chisholm laments, “nobody knows about them.”<br />
Chisholm perceives a gap in the public’s scientific literacy surrounding<br />
photosynthesis, which frustrates her because the process<br />
is so central to life. She points to a 1997 video produced by the Harvard-Smithsonian<br />
Center for Astrophysics, in which freshly minted<br />
Harvard University and MIT graduates are handed a seed and a log<br />
and asked where the mass of a tree comes from. The students offer<br />
water and nutrients drawn from the soil as candidates and are incredulous<br />
when presented with the idea that the vast majority of the<br />
mass is derived from CO 2 in the air.<br />
The general public “doesn’t understand photosynthesis, and<br />
they should,” Chisholm recalls venting to her friend Molly Bang, a<br />
children’s book author, in 2001. A few years later, Bang was looking<br />
for another science topic to follow up on her 2004 book “ My Light ,”<br />
which teaches children about electricity and introduces the idea<br />
that it ultimately comes from the sun. In 2005 Chisholm and Bang<br />
began work on what would become their 2009 collaboration “ Living<br />
Sunlight: How Plants Bring the Earth to Life .” It<br />
is solidly a children’s book, but kids are far from the<br />
only targeted audience. “Most adults aren’t going to<br />
buy a book about photosynthesis for themselves,”<br />
Chisholm tells C&EN, “but they might buy one for<br />
their children and read it to them.”<br />
In “Living Sunlight” Chisholm and Bang focus<br />
on photosynthesis on land, writing at a kindergarten<br />
to fifth-grade reading level about how plants<br />
absorb the sun’s rays and use that energy to convert<br />
water and CO 2 into glucose, which then feeds the<br />
JAMES M. LONG<br />
“Most adults<br />
aren’t going to<br />
buy a book about<br />
photosynthesis for<br />
themselves, but<br />
they might buy one<br />
for their children<br />
and read it to them.”<br />
WWW.CEN-ONLINE.ORG 56 FEBRUARY <strong>27</strong>, <strong>2012</strong><br />
rest of the food web. The colorful illustrations<br />
and simple text are supplemented<br />
with an appendix that is more<br />
substantial than those found in most<br />
children’s books. The pair teamed up<br />
for another book, titled “ Ocean Sunlight:<br />
How Tiny Plants Feed the Seas ,”<br />
that is slated to come out in May.<br />
The upcoming work opens by reminding<br />
readers about land plants<br />
and then asks: If life on land depends<br />
on plants and there’s all this life in the<br />
sea, where are the plants of the sea?<br />
“ ‘Ocean Sunlight’ has been the hardest<br />
thing I’ve ever done,” Chisholm<br />
says. The hardest bit was boiling her life’s work down to its essence<br />
and not letting other details sneak in. But given Chisholm’s enthusiasm<br />
for the research, she found it hard to leave the details out.<br />
In “Ocean Sunlight,” for example, Chisholm and Bang talk about<br />
bottom-up population control, the idea that the availabilities of nitrogen<br />
and phosphorus limit the growth of phytoplankton like Prochloroccus<br />
. However, top-down control, wherein predation limits<br />
populations, is mentioned only in passing. It’s complex, Chisholm<br />
says. “We’re trying to teach systems dynamics to six year olds.”<br />
WRITING CHILDREN’S BOOKS has forced Chisholm to set priorities<br />
and think holistically about how her work fits in a larger context.<br />
In much the same way, teaching undergraduate classes has helped<br />
Chisholm develop a vision for her research and a compelling way to<br />
explain its importance to scientists and laypeople alike.<br />
That broader perspective has an impact in the lab. “Thinking<br />
about the big picture,” Chisholm argues, “has become a great asset<br />
for my research. It helps me identify the fundamentally important<br />
questions—it provides a compass for our work.” Communicating<br />
with the general public pays dividends in that process, she says, and<br />
collaborating with Bang on “Living Sunlight” and “Ocean Sunlight”<br />
has been an extension of that.<br />
Because of the books, she is invited to speak at a wide range of<br />
events. For example, she gives regular talks on the MIT alumni<br />
lecture circuit, and she speaks to MIT’s Knight Science Journalism<br />
program each year. “Anytime you’re invited to do a talk for a general<br />
audience, go for it; there is no better way” to get<br />
down to the core of a scientific problem, she says.<br />
“At most universities, there are more opportunities<br />
for outreach than there is faculty interest or<br />
time,” Chisholm notes. To her, however, outreach to<br />
the general public should be a priority for scientists,<br />
right alongside the demands of research, funding,<br />
and management. “I’ve been enjoying the taxpayers’<br />
dollars for 35 years, having all this fun in the lab, so<br />
I feel it’s really important that I make every effort I<br />
can for them to understand what we learn.” ◾