29.10.2014 Views

February 27, 2012 - IMM@BUCT

February 27, 2012 - IMM@BUCT

February 27, 2012 - IMM@BUCT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C&EN TALKS WITH<br />

PENNY CHISHOLM<br />

MIT BIOLOGIST discusses the benefits of public outreach<br />

CRAIG BETTENHAUSEN , C&EN WASHINGTON<br />

PROCHLOROCOCCUS is the smallest<br />

cell on the planet that can harvest<br />

energy directly from the sun. This tiny<br />

marine cyanobacterium, less than<br />

1 µm across, represents a huge portion<br />

of the ocean biomass; an estimated<br />

10 <strong>27</strong> of them roam the oceans. Yet scientists<br />

were unaware of Prochlorococcus<br />

until 1985, when Massachusetts Institute<br />

of Technology biologist Sallie<br />

W. (Penny) Chisholm and colleagues<br />

from Woods Hole Oceanographic<br />

Institution spotted a chlorophyll<br />

fluorescence coming from a tiny cell<br />

careening through the capillary tube<br />

of their flow cytometry apparatus. The discovery begat a sea change<br />

in the understanding of the ocean’s food web.<br />

In addition to its outsized role in the ecosystem, Prochlorococcus<br />

also has the smallest genome of any O 2 -evolving organism, at around<br />

2,000 genes. The portion that codes for the photosynthetic machinery—1,200<br />

genes that are conserved across the many different<br />

strains—composes the most succinct genetic picture of photosynthesis<br />

available. But even 26 years after the discovery of Prochlorococcus<br />

, though the organisms “contribute a significant fraction of global<br />

photosynthesis,” Chisholm laments, “nobody knows about them.”<br />

Chisholm perceives a gap in the public’s scientific literacy surrounding<br />

photosynthesis, which frustrates her because the process<br />

is so central to life. She points to a 1997 video produced by the Harvard-Smithsonian<br />

Center for Astrophysics, in which freshly minted<br />

Harvard University and MIT graduates are handed a seed and a log<br />

and asked where the mass of a tree comes from. The students offer<br />

water and nutrients drawn from the soil as candidates and are incredulous<br />

when presented with the idea that the vast majority of the<br />

mass is derived from CO 2 in the air.<br />

The general public “doesn’t understand photosynthesis, and<br />

they should,” Chisholm recalls venting to her friend Molly Bang, a<br />

children’s book author, in 2001. A few years later, Bang was looking<br />

for another science topic to follow up on her 2004 book “ My Light ,”<br />

which teaches children about electricity and introduces the idea<br />

that it ultimately comes from the sun. In 2005 Chisholm and Bang<br />

began work on what would become their 2009 collaboration “ Living<br />

Sunlight: How Plants Bring the Earth to Life .” It<br />

is solidly a children’s book, but kids are far from the<br />

only targeted audience. “Most adults aren’t going to<br />

buy a book about photosynthesis for themselves,”<br />

Chisholm tells C&EN, “but they might buy one for<br />

their children and read it to them.”<br />

In “Living Sunlight” Chisholm and Bang focus<br />

on photosynthesis on land, writing at a kindergarten<br />

to fifth-grade reading level about how plants<br />

absorb the sun’s rays and use that energy to convert<br />

water and CO 2 into glucose, which then feeds the<br />

JAMES M. LONG<br />

“Most adults<br />

aren’t going to<br />

buy a book about<br />

photosynthesis for<br />

themselves, but<br />

they might buy one<br />

for their children<br />

and read it to them.”<br />

WWW.CEN-ONLINE.ORG 56 FEBRUARY <strong>27</strong>, <strong>2012</strong><br />

rest of the food web. The colorful illustrations<br />

and simple text are supplemented<br />

with an appendix that is more<br />

substantial than those found in most<br />

children’s books. The pair teamed up<br />

for another book, titled “ Ocean Sunlight:<br />

How Tiny Plants Feed the Seas ,”<br />

that is slated to come out in May.<br />

The upcoming work opens by reminding<br />

readers about land plants<br />

and then asks: If life on land depends<br />

on plants and there’s all this life in the<br />

sea, where are the plants of the sea?<br />

“ ‘Ocean Sunlight’ has been the hardest<br />

thing I’ve ever done,” Chisholm<br />

says. The hardest bit was boiling her life’s work down to its essence<br />

and not letting other details sneak in. But given Chisholm’s enthusiasm<br />

for the research, she found it hard to leave the details out.<br />

In “Ocean Sunlight,” for example, Chisholm and Bang talk about<br />

bottom-up population control, the idea that the availabilities of nitrogen<br />

and phosphorus limit the growth of phytoplankton like Prochloroccus<br />

. However, top-down control, wherein predation limits<br />

populations, is mentioned only in passing. It’s complex, Chisholm<br />

says. “We’re trying to teach systems dynamics to six year olds.”<br />

WRITING CHILDREN’S BOOKS has forced Chisholm to set priorities<br />

and think holistically about how her work fits in a larger context.<br />

In much the same way, teaching undergraduate classes has helped<br />

Chisholm develop a vision for her research and a compelling way to<br />

explain its importance to scientists and laypeople alike.<br />

That broader perspective has an impact in the lab. “Thinking<br />

about the big picture,” Chisholm argues, “has become a great asset<br />

for my research. It helps me identify the fundamentally important<br />

questions—it provides a compass for our work.” Communicating<br />

with the general public pays dividends in that process, she says, and<br />

collaborating with Bang on “Living Sunlight” and “Ocean Sunlight”<br />

has been an extension of that.<br />

Because of the books, she is invited to speak at a wide range of<br />

events. For example, she gives regular talks on the MIT alumni<br />

lecture circuit, and she speaks to MIT’s Knight Science Journalism<br />

program each year. “Anytime you’re invited to do a talk for a general<br />

audience, go for it; there is no better way” to get<br />

down to the core of a scientific problem, she says.<br />

“At most universities, there are more opportunities<br />

for outreach than there is faculty interest or<br />

time,” Chisholm notes. To her, however, outreach to<br />

the general public should be a priority for scientists,<br />

right alongside the demands of research, funding,<br />

and management. “I’ve been enjoying the taxpayers’<br />

dollars for 35 years, having all this fun in the lab, so<br />

I feel it’s really important that I make every effort I<br />

can for them to understand what we learn.” ◾

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!