29.10.2014 Views

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TOPIC 1<br />

Injection well issues, aquifer storage <strong>and</strong> recovery / <strong>Recharge</strong> <strong>systems</strong> 153<br />

Environment Protection Authority (EPA) requirements. The ASR wells are equipped with extraction pumps <strong>and</strong><br />

recharge (injection) facilities. There are five observation wells used <strong>for</strong> monitoring the effects of the ASR operation.<br />

Three are located around the Parafield facility <strong>and</strong> two are placed 900 m to the south one in the overlying T1<br />

aquifer <strong>and</strong> one in the T2 aquifer.<br />

The extraction pumps are variable speed drive submersible units each with a nominal capacity of 4.3 ML/d, giving<br />

a total ASR delivery capacity of 8.6 ML/d. The recharge capacity of each well is nominally 3.0 ML /d, giving a total<br />

of 6.0 ML/d recharge capacity. The well pumps <strong>and</strong> recharge facilities are operated automatically by the control system<br />

which can be accessed by telemetry from the Salisbury Council offices. Both wells operate together either in the<br />

recharge mode or in delivery mode or are inactive at any one time. Individual wells can be taken out of service. All<br />

cleansed water flows in excess of the pipeline dem<strong>and</strong> rate are recharged to the ASR wells. When there is no water<br />

flow from the reedbed the full dem<strong>and</strong> is supplied from the ASR wellfield.<br />

It is infeasible to extract 100% of the volume of water that has recharged the aquifer <strong>and</strong> maintain acceptable salinity.<br />

This is because of mixing of the recharged water <strong>and</strong> the native <strong>groundwate</strong>r around the edges of the recharge<br />

plume. Hence it is assumed that only 80% of the recharged water can be extracted at an acceptable salinity. Flow<br />

controllers are located on the recharge connections to avoid over pressurising the aquifer during recharge. The<br />

flow controller setting at the well head is based on the hydraulic characteristics of the completed well. At times the<br />

wells suffer clogging from particulates <strong>and</strong> biomass build-up. Each well has a purging system <strong>for</strong> clearing of the<br />

clogging material. This is discharged to the in-stream basin via 150 mm diameter purge water pipes. Flow, level <strong>and</strong><br />

salinity data are collected from the ASR operating <strong>and</strong> observation wells by the control system as part of the ASR<br />

Management Plan required by the Department of Water L<strong>and</strong> Biodiversity <strong>and</strong> Conservation (DWLBC) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Northern Adelaide – Barossa Catchment Water Management Board (NABCWMB). Due to this project Australia’s<br />

largest wool processing company (G.H. Michell & Sons) receives water with a salinity (TDS) of less than 250 mg / L,<br />

which is significantly lower than the salinity of mains water derived in dry years mostly from the River Murray<br />

(which frequently exceeds 400 mg/L).<br />

Operational results<br />

Stormwater harvesting <strong>and</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong><br />

Stormwater could be selected <strong>for</strong> harvesting <strong>and</strong> poorer quality water was bypassed from the ASR system. Table 1<br />

indicates the quality of water in the drain <strong>and</strong> in the discharge from the wetl<strong>and</strong>. The data indicate no parameters<br />

exceed the national guideline <strong>for</strong> irrigation water quality, <strong>and</strong> most parameters <strong>for</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong>-treated stormwater compare<br />

favourably with existing drinking water supplies.<br />

Table 1. Contaminant reduction through selection of water from Parafield Drain <strong>for</strong> harvesting<br />

<strong>and</strong> treatment in the Parafield Wetl<strong>and</strong>s*<br />

PARAMETER<br />

Suite Taken Parafield drain median Reedbed median Percent reduction<br />

General<br />

Conductivity (µS/cm) 457 191 58 #<br />

Total Dissolved Solids 250 100 60 #<br />

pH 7.70 7.00 9<br />

suspended solids 13.00 3.00 77<br />

total organic carbon 8.90 4.40 51<br />

turbidity 8.10 1.70 79<br />

10 – 16 June 2005, Berlin ■ 5th International Symposium ■ AQUIFER RECHARGE ■ ISMAR 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!