29.10.2014 Views

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

338<br />

TOPIC 3<br />

Modelling aspects <strong>and</strong> <strong>groundwate</strong>r hydraulics<br />

Gordon <strong>and</strong> Toze, 2003), <strong>and</strong> mixed human <strong>and</strong> animal wastes (Deng <strong>and</strong> Cliver, 1995; Nasser <strong>and</strong> Oman, 1999) have<br />

a major role in the inactivation of microbial pathogens. In the case of Cryptosporidium, it has also been shown that<br />

autochthonous microorganisms (<strong>and</strong> exo-enzymes from bacteria or fungi) in river water can influence the survival<br />

of the oocytes (Medema et al., 1997), but there are relatively few investigations using <strong>groundwate</strong>r (John, 2003).<br />

The <strong>for</strong>mulation of a computer model <strong>for</strong> determining minimum required retention times <strong>for</strong> microbial pathogen<br />

die-off during aquifer storage is one piece of a complex puzzle. As managed aquifer recharge projects become<br />

increasingly utilised, it is critical that water resource managers have a quantitative index of the risk of human exposure<br />

to viable pathogenic microorganisms. This is one of the first studies to systematically investigate some of the<br />

fundamental controls on the inactivation of microbial pathogens due to the activity of indigenous <strong>groundwate</strong>r<br />

bacteria with the aim of developing a reliable framework <strong>for</strong> predicting minimum aquifer retention times.<br />

METHODS<br />

There are a multitude of environmental stresses in the subsurface that could influence the survival of microbial<br />

pathogens (Yates <strong>and</strong> Yates, 1988). In a recent survey of published decay rates <strong>for</strong> microbial pathogens, Toze (2004)<br />

identified temperature, dissolved oxygen, water chemistry, source of water, as well as the type of pathogenic<br />

microorganism, as the most commonly cited factors influencing pathogen survival. The viruses are more resistant to<br />

pH <strong>and</strong> electrical conductivity (salt species <strong>and</strong> concentration) than bacteria, such that it has been postulated that<br />

water chemistry directly impacts the activity of indigenous bacteria, which in turn has a secondary affect on the persistence<br />

of viruses (Toze, 2004). As different studies of microbial survival have examined different pathogens under<br />

a variety of environmental conditions, it is difficult to use published decay rates to <strong>for</strong>mulate a predictive model.<br />

The approach we are using is to systematically vary several environmental stresses identified by Gordon <strong>and</strong> Toze<br />

(2003) as potential factors influencing the survival of enteric viruses: temperature, redox state <strong>and</strong> nutrient levels<br />

are currently being considered (Sidhu et al., in press). Although treated effluent can have a range of nutrient types<br />

<strong>and</strong> concentrations, we are first considering a complex organic carbon source <strong>and</strong> its effects on several pathogenic<br />

microbes through the activity of non-pathogenic microorganisms native to <strong>groundwate</strong>r.<br />

Collection of data from pathogen survival experiments<br />

Survival experiments are being undertaken to provide data to be used in the generation of the computer model as<br />

well as using data from previous experiments. Current experiments are focusing on the influence of microbial activity<br />

on the decay of a range of microbial pathogens. As it has been established that the activity of indigenous<br />

<strong>groundwate</strong>r microorganisms is the major influence on pathogen decay (Gordon <strong>and</strong> Toze, 2003), our focus is on<br />

evaluating the influence of other biological, chemical <strong>and</strong> physical conditions on <strong>groundwate</strong>r microbial activity<br />

<strong>and</strong> the subsequent impact on the decay of enteric pathogens in <strong>groundwate</strong>r. The biological processes affecting a<br />

range of enteric pathogens that are commonly found in reclaimed water are being considered. The type of pathogen<br />

has been shown to be an important factor as differences in decay rates have been observed between different<br />

pathogens, even those that are genetically similar (Toze <strong>and</strong> Hanna, 2002; Gordon <strong>and</strong> Toze, 2003). As shown in<br />

Figure 1, the survival of poliovirus <strong>and</strong> coxsackievirus under a similar set of environment stresses are quite different,<br />

despite the microorganisms having genetic similarities. A list of some of the major pathogens to be investigated<br />

is given in Table 1.<br />

The major chemical <strong>and</strong> physical parameters of interest are the type of degradable organic carbon present, the redox<br />

condition of the <strong>groundwate</strong>r <strong>and</strong> a range of temperatures (5 - 20 °C). It is hypothesized that these parameters<br />

impact on the metabolic activity <strong>and</strong> population structure of the indigenous <strong>groundwate</strong>r microorganisms, thus<br />

influencing the rate of decay of the different pathogens. The experiments on pathogen survival under the different<br />

<strong>groundwate</strong>r conditions are being undertaken using non-sterile <strong>groundwate</strong>r obtained from a bore in the superficial<br />

aquifer at the CSIRO laboratories in Perth, Western Australia. Groups of the selected pathogens are added to bio-<br />

ISMAR 2005 ■ AQUIFER RECHARGE ■ 5th International Symposium ■ 10 –16 June 2005, Berlin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!