29.10.2014 Views

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TOPIC 6<br />

Region issues <strong>and</strong> artificial recharge case studies / Case studies 765<br />

Figure 4 shows the water level responses in the re-injection bore, two nearby dolomite monitor bores <strong>and</strong> one<br />

shallow calcrete monitor bore during the trial. When the levels are compared to the type curves developed by Pyne<br />

(1995) <strong>for</strong> air entrainment <strong>and</strong> suspended solids, there is no evidence of either clogging mechanism. However the<br />

rate of drawup rate in the injection bore was found to increase after two days of operation, with no corresponding<br />

increase in water level in the observation bores to suggest an aquifer boundary influence. This reaction may indicate<br />

the possibility of a low degree of clogging by air, bacterial growth or chemical precipitation during the trial.<br />

690<br />

Rate increase<br />

Rate increase<br />

688<br />

Water Level (mAHD)<br />

686<br />

684<br />

Static water level<br />

682<br />

Static water level<br />

680<br />

0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000<br />

Pumping Time (minutes)<br />

Figure 4. Mar<strong>and</strong>oo BWT trial reinjction site water levels<br />

Reinjection Bore TIB1a<br />

TIB1 (7m)<br />

OW30d (14m)<br />

OW30s (shallow)<br />

Injection bore TIB1 bore has essentially the same construction as TIB1a, <strong>and</strong> the two were designed to operate in<br />

t<strong>and</strong>em if required. TIB1 was test-pumped at a rate of 3.0 ML/d in May 2003. The drawdown after 1 hour was<br />

7.2 m. By comparison, the ‘drawup’ in TIB1a after 1 hour of re-injection at a rate of 3.7 ML/d was 5.9 m. This<br />

comparison suggests that in this case the re-injection operation may be slightly more hydraulically efficient than<br />

pumping. The open-hole construction of the re-injection bores undoubtedly influenced the efficiency of the injection<br />

process.<br />

The effectiveness of the injection tube <strong>and</strong> downhole cone arrangement to manage air entrainment was demonstrated<br />

by the trial. This low-cost arrangement is to be refined during an upcoming multi bore re injection project<br />

also at Mar<strong>and</strong>oo where the re-injection tubes will be sized to the maximum design flow rate, <strong>and</strong> cones will be<br />

used to manage lower flow rates.<br />

The trial required a full-time (10 hours per day) presence on-site throughout the duration of the 44 days of operation.<br />

A technician was retained to refuel <strong>and</strong> maintain generators, maintain pumping rates, monitor water levels<br />

<strong>and</strong> inspect the pipeline pressures <strong>and</strong> general condition. The only notable infrastructure problems were three<br />

generator/electrical failures, which caused a combined individual pump downtime of 23 hours. In general the infrastructure<br />

operated successfully <strong>and</strong> enabled collection of a good dataset.<br />

Assessment of aquifer interconnection<br />

The extent of lateral connection across the deep <strong>groundwate</strong>r system can be seen in the cones of depression/<br />

impression overlayed on Figure 1. The cones display net ‘drawup’ in some Marra Mamba monitor bores on the mine<br />

10 – 16 June 2005, Berlin ■ 5th International Symposium ■ AQUIFER RECHARGE ■ ISMAR 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!