29.10.2014 Views

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TOPIC 6<br />

Region issues <strong>and</strong> artificial recharge case studies / Case studies 757<br />

measured from the compiled piezometric maps (Stavropoulos, 1992, Voudouris, 1995). The mean hydraulic conductivity<br />

was estimated to be 1.5 x 10 –5 m/s <strong>and</strong> the S-coefficient in Plio-Quaternary deposits about 1.5 x 10 –4 .<br />

FIELD EXPERIMENTS<br />

Six (6) new boreholes were drilled (Fig. 1): three in Larisos basin (B1, B2, B3), <strong>and</strong> three in Piros basin (B4, B5 <strong>and</strong><br />

B6). The selection of the location was done by using criteria like availability of l<strong>and</strong>, high permeability, gravity flow<br />

from water source to recharge borehole, etc. After each borehole had been drilled, pumping tests were carried out,<br />

in order to estimate the critical yield (Table 1).<br />

Table 1. Drilling data of recharge boreholes.<br />

Borehole<br />

Geological<br />

<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Depth<br />

(m)<br />

Critical yield<br />

(m3/h)<br />

Groundwater level<br />

(m b.g.s.)<br />

B1<br />

B2<br />

S<strong>and</strong>stones <strong>and</strong> conglomerates<br />

(flysch deposits)<br />

S<strong>and</strong>stones <strong>and</strong> conglomerates<br />

(flysch deposits)<br />

242 75<br />

241 35<br />

B3 S<strong>and</strong>s, gravels, conglomerates 215 100<br />

B4 S<strong>and</strong>s, gravels, conglomerates 196 100<br />

B5<br />

S<strong>and</strong>stones <strong>and</strong> conglomerates<br />

(flysch deposits)<br />

202 25<br />

B6 Limestones 180 30<br />

51.08<br />

(1/3/02)<br />

23.46<br />

(10/4/02)<br />

9.61<br />

(4/4/02)<br />

22.61<br />

(8/4/02)<br />

23.08<br />

(6/3/02)<br />

6.21<br />

(18/4/02)<br />

Water from surface runoff <strong>and</strong> springs, without any treatment, was used during the aquifer recharge experiments in<br />

the boreholes, (Table 2). The water was transferred at each site via the existing irrigation network. Measurements of<br />

<strong>groundwate</strong>r level were made in the piezometers of the recharge boreholes, as well as in the neighbouring observation<br />

boreholes.<br />

Table 2. Results of the conducted <strong>groundwate</strong>r recharge tests<br />

Borehole<br />

<strong>Recharge</strong> water<br />

Period /Duration<br />

(days)<br />

<strong>Recharge</strong><br />

flow rate<br />

(m3/h)<br />

Water<br />

volume<br />

(m 3 )<br />

Water<br />

level rise<br />

(m)<br />

B1<br />

Surface water<br />

1/3/2002–2/5/2002<br />

63 days<br />

42 63,500 44.93<br />

B2<br />

Surface water<br />

10/4/2002–30/4/2002<br />

20 days<br />

13 6,200 19.83<br />

B3<br />

Discharge of springs<br />

4/4/2002–4/5/2002<br />

30 days<br />

10 7,200 4.16<br />

B4<br />

Irrigation canal<br />

8/4/2002–3/5/2002<br />

26 days<br />

75 46,800 8.51<br />

B5<br />

Surface water<br />

6/3/2002–6/4/2002<br />

32 days<br />

12 9,200 13.61<br />

B6<br />

Discharge of springs<br />

18/4/2002–5/5/2002<br />

18 days<br />

8 3,500 3.26<br />

10 – 16 June 2005, Berlin ■ 5th International Symposium ■ AQUIFER RECHARGE ■ ISMAR 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!