29.10.2014 Views

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

848<br />

TOPIC 7<br />

Sustainability of managing recharge <strong>systems</strong> / MAR strategies<br />

All water bodies in Fig. 6 are pH-neutral (<strong>and</strong> calcite saturated) due to a high CaCO 3 content of the dune<br />

<strong>and</strong> underlying beach s<strong>and</strong>s. The recharged polder waters deviate from the Rhine <strong>and</strong> Meuse River waters by their<br />

freshened <strong>and</strong> reduced character (AP FR ) already at their starting point in the upper aquifer. This is due to a primary<br />

Na+K+Mg-excess of this surface water which receives seepage of dune <strong>groundwate</strong>r displacing relict brackish<br />

<strong>groundwate</strong>rs. Their initial reduced facies is caused by very high nutrient loads which led to much sludge <strong>for</strong>mation<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus consumption of all available O 2 <strong>and</strong> NO 3 . Downgradient this AP FR water looses its primary freshened<br />

character (positive BEX) by exchange <strong>for</strong> Ca (site 3).<br />

The general hydrochemical evolution of Rhine River water downgradient, in the period 1980–1990, is: from<br />

polluted (thus pH-neutral, (sub)oxic, BEX-equilibrated), to polluted <strong>and</strong> reduced, to polluted, reduced <strong>and</strong><br />

salinized (site 4). The salinized facies is due to displacement of fresher dune water, having relatively low Na, K <strong>and</strong><br />

Mg concentrations.<br />

The evolution of Meuse River water downgradient (area 2), in the period 1980–1990, deviates from the one<br />

<strong>for</strong> Rhine water by a freshened instead of salinized facies. This is due to displacement of saltier Rhine River water,<br />

having relatively high Na, K <strong>and</strong> Mg concentrations.<br />

The improved quality of Rhine <strong>and</strong> Meuse River water, notably since the early 1980s, has contributed to a significant<br />

decrease of their pollution index WAPI. This also holds <strong>for</strong> the upper infiltrated waters in the dunes since<br />

the 1990s, thus with a significant delay. This delay is due to (a) the slow leaching of pollutants that accumulated<br />

in both sludges <strong>and</strong> the aquifer system, (b) abolition of the chlorination <strong>for</strong> transport (from pretreatment plant to<br />

infiltration area) since about 1990, <strong>and</strong> (c) removal of the older, relatively polluted sludges from the basins mainly<br />

in the 1990s.<br />

Figure 6. Spatial distribution of hydrosomes (<strong>groundwate</strong>r bodies) <strong>and</strong> their chemical facies (period 1980–1990)<br />

along a section parallel to the North Sea coast, in between Hoek van Holl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Z<strong>and</strong>voort<br />

(slightly modified after Stuyfz<strong>and</strong>, 1993). For characteristics of recharge sites 1–5 see text.<br />

The Rhine fluvial plain in the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

The spatial distribution of Rhine bank filtrate, in its fluvial plain in the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s (Fig. 7), is dictated by the exfiltration<br />

of fresh <strong>groundwate</strong>r from ice-pushed hills (in between well fields 25 <strong>and</strong> 45), the pumping of <strong>groundwate</strong>r<br />

ISMAR 2005 ■ AQUIFER RECHARGE ■ 5th International Symposium ■ 10 –16 June 2005, Berlin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!