29.10.2014 Views

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

780<br />

TOPIC 7<br />

Sustainability of managing recharge <strong>systems</strong> / MAR strategies<br />

other factors such as l<strong>and</strong>fills <strong>and</strong> engineering structures (multi-storey building basements <strong>and</strong> underground<br />

railway tunnels) may locally limit the <strong>groundwate</strong>r level draw-up cone at locations adjacent to the pumping borehole<br />

(Jones et al., in press). Borehole recharge capacity was calculated from Equation 5.<br />

RC = (GWLMax - RGWL) * S c Eqn. (5)<br />

Where RC is the recharge capacity, S c is the specific capacity of the borehole, RGWL is the rest <strong>groundwate</strong>r level<br />

<strong>and</strong> GWLMax is the maximum allowable head (i.e. the ground surface level). Borehole abstraction capacity is also a<br />

difficult parameter to calculate because the minimum allowable head is limited by a number of factors that change<br />

across the study area. These include existing borehole pump depths (derogation issues); minimum <strong>groundwate</strong>r<br />

levels acceptable to regulators that are yet to be defined; <strong>and</strong> local water quality issues associated with dewatering<br />

the Basal S<strong>and</strong>s (a leaky layer that includes the Thanet S<strong>and</strong>s at its base). However as significant borehole hydraulic<br />

tests are available from the SLARS area, abstraction capacity was determined from test results <strong>and</strong> values contoured<br />

in the GIS accordingly. Alternatively where borehole abstraction capacity data are not available, abstraction capacity<br />

may be calculated using Equation 6.<br />

AC = (RGWL – GWLMin) * S c Eqn. (6)<br />

Where AC is abstraction capacity <strong>and</strong> RGWL <strong>and</strong> GWLMin are the rest <strong>groundwate</strong>r level <strong>and</strong> minimum allowable<br />

<strong>groundwate</strong>r level respectively. However in order to use Equations 5 <strong>and</strong> 6, values <strong>for</strong> specific capacity are required.<br />

In this study reciprocal specific capacity values were determined from Equation 7 below (Bierschenk, 1963).<br />

1/S c = s w /Q = B + CQ Eqn. (7)<br />

Where s w is the drawdown in a pumped borehole, B is the time variable linear well loss coefficient <strong>and</strong> C is the<br />

non-linear well loss coefficient that is independent of time. Theis (1967) rearranged the Cooper <strong>and</strong> Jacob (1946)<br />

equation to show reciprocal specific capacity as a function of the transmissivity <strong>and</strong> time, but it is clear from<br />

Bierschenk’s analysis that the Theis equation describes only the linear loss component of the specific capacity identified<br />

in Equation 7. This gives the equation <strong>for</strong> the linear loss coefficient B, (Equation 8). It should also be noted<br />

that this equation assumes full penetration <strong>and</strong> an effective radius that is equal to the actual borehole radius. In the<br />

dual porosity Chalk of the SLARS area, this normally occurs after elapsed pumping (or recharge) times of 100 to<br />

1,000 minutes.<br />

B = 2.3 log [(2.25 T t) / (r 2 S)] / (4 π T) Eqn. (8)<br />

Mace (1997) showed that specific capacity is a function<br />

of the non-linear loss coefficient, C, <strong>and</strong> transmissivity,<br />

T. However C is also a function of T. The mathematical<br />

function is most easily determined from best-fit empirical<br />

data using available pumping test data. In the SLARS<br />

study area, only data from boreholes with similar construction<br />

that may be considered to con<strong>for</strong>m to the<br />

Thames Water st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>for</strong> borehole construction were<br />

used. This empirical relationship is shown on Figure 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> is defined in Equation 9.<br />

C (d2/m5)<br />

1E-6<br />

1E-7<br />

1E-8<br />

Transmissivity (m2/d)<br />

10 100 1000 10000<br />

1E-5<br />

C = 0.0004 T –1.3625 Eqn. (9)<br />

1E-9<br />

Figure 2. Relationship of C to T<br />

ISMAR 2005 ■ AQUIFER RECHARGE ■ 5th International Symposium ■ 10 –16 June 2005, Berlin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!