29.10.2014 Views

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TOPIC 7<br />

Arid zones water management / Sustainability of managing recharge <strong>systems</strong> 871<br />

H<br />

H<br />

0.10<br />

0.09<br />

0.08<br />

0.07<br />

0.06<br />

o<br />

/ 0.05<br />

0.04<br />

0.03<br />

0.02<br />

0.01<br />

Matching point<br />

Type curve<br />

H : Residual<br />

drawdown<br />

Field data curve<br />

t = 5 min.<br />

–1<br />

o< = 10<br />

2<br />

T = ((rc) / t) X 1<br />

2 = ((1.65) / 5) X 1<br />

T = 784 m 2/day<br />

S = 2 2 (rc) / (rs) X o<<br />

2 2 –1<br />

= ((1.65) / (1.85)) X 10<br />

S = 0.080<br />

)<br />

B 1<br />

10,<br />

w<br />

U<br />

F (<br />

0<br />

10<br />

3 0<br />

1 2<br />

1<br />

10<br />

10 10 10<br />

10 4<br />

10 10<br />

m 10 0 )<br />

5<br />

T = ( Q / 4 Π SW ) . F(Uw, B) S = (4 Tt / (rw) ) . U<br />

= (0.2 / 4 X 3.14 X 0.1) X 6.2<br />

2 4<br />

/ (1.575) x = ( 4 X 0.016 X 200 (5x10)<br />

= 23.68 m /day<br />

S = 1.03 x 10 –5<br />

10 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

- 1<br />

10<br />

wdownsw(<br />

D r a<br />

10 - 2<br />

Field data<br />

Type curve<br />

Matching point<br />

Time (t) (min.)<br />

10- 2 - 1<br />

10 100 10 1<br />

10 2 103<br />

Time (t) min.<br />

Figure 4. Analysis of pumping test data of El Gahelia dug<br />

well using slug test (Papadopulos et al., 1973)<br />

1 -<br />

10<br />

2<br />

10 10 10<br />

1 / U<br />

10 10 10<br />

Figure 5. Analysis of pumping test data<br />

of Frokeit well (Papadopulos’ method).<br />

Hydrogeologic conditions of Nubia s<strong>and</strong>stone aquifer<br />

Nubia s<strong>and</strong>stone aquifer has a tremendous importance in the area. It covers the northwestern part of the investigated<br />

area. Nubia s<strong>and</strong>stone rests directly on basement rocks. It is composed of fine to coarse s<strong>and</strong>stone intercalated<br />

with clay. The thickness ranges between 100 m up to 500 m (Aglan, 2001). It is detected as a water-bearing<br />

in Wadi Abraq, Abu Saafa <strong>and</strong> Wadi EL Dif. Five representative water points were selected in the study area. The<br />

<strong>groundwate</strong>r occurs under confined conditions (Abraq spring) <strong>and</strong> semi- confined conditions (drilled wells).<br />

Rainfall <strong>and</strong> flash floods on the s<strong>and</strong>stone plateau <strong>and</strong> the surrounding fractured basement rocks are considered to<br />

be the main sources of <strong>groundwate</strong>r replenishment. Depth to water varies from 8.17 m to 21.75 m from the ground<br />

surface. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the water level ranges between + 248 m <strong>and</strong> + 281 m (Fig. 6, Table 1).<br />

The hydraulic parameters of Nubian s<strong>and</strong>stone aquifer<br />

Elewa (2000) mentioned that, the aquifer sediments reflect a wide range of transmissivity (from 2.72 m 2 /day to<br />

72.4 m 2 /day)). This could be attributed to the lateral facies change as well as the impact of the structural setting. To<br />

confirm the obtained results, a trial was carried out by the author using raw data of pumping tests of El Dif well<br />

(GARPAD, 1996), using Jacob straight line method (1963). The obtained value of the transmissivity is comparable<br />

to the previous data (Fig. 7).<br />

Ab u Saafa- b<br />

Abu Saafa - c<br />

)<br />

(<br />

ti on<br />

l<br />

300<br />

280<br />

260<br />

240<br />

220<br />

200<br />

180<br />

m<br />

160<br />

a 140<br />

e v E 120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0.0<br />

-20<br />

W.T.<br />

SW<br />

Abu Saafa - a<br />

a<br />

-<br />

i q<br />

t a<br />

i r E<br />

B<br />

l w<br />

e<br />

l i<br />

h<br />

e<br />

a<br />

G<br />

a<br />

L<br />

E<br />

D'<br />

4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 km<br />

Legend<br />

S<strong>and</strong><br />

Quaternary<br />

Gravel<br />

S<strong>and</strong>stone Nubian<br />

S<strong>and</strong>y clay S<strong>and</strong>stone<br />

Basement rocks<br />

Suggested fault<br />

0.0 5 10 15 20 25 km<br />

H. Scale<br />

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 km<br />

V. Scale<br />

Figure 6. Hydogeological cross section ( D–D' )<br />

from southwest to northeast Abu Saafa-El Gahelia area<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

)<br />

( m<br />

2.5<br />

n s<br />

2<br />

o w<br />

1.5<br />

D r awd<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

1<br />

∆s = 1.2 m<br />

Q = 480 m3 / day<br />

T = 73.31 m 2 / day<br />

10<br />

T = 2.3 Q / (4π∆S)<br />

100<br />

Time t (min)<br />

1000<br />

Figure 7. Analysis of pumping test data<br />

of Bir El Dif<br />

10000<br />

10 – 16 June 2005, Berlin ■ 5th International Symposium ■ AQUIFER RECHARGE ■ ISMAR 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!