bc8G2-7
bc8G2-7
bc8G2-7
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Doing Business 2015<br />
Going Beyond Efficiency<br />
Distance to frontier and ease<br />
of doing business ranking<br />
This year’s report presents results<br />
for 2 aggregate measures:<br />
the distance to frontier score<br />
and the ease of doing business ranking,<br />
which for the first time this year<br />
is based on the distance to frontier<br />
score. The ease of doing business<br />
ranking compares economies with one<br />
another; the distance to frontier score<br />
benchmarks economies with respect<br />
to regulatory best practice, showing<br />
the absolute distance to the best<br />
performance on each Doing Business indicator.<br />
When compared across years,<br />
the distance to frontier score shows<br />
how much the regulatory environment<br />
for local entrepreneurs in an economy<br />
has changed over time in absolute<br />
terms, while the ease of doing business<br />
ranking can show only how much the<br />
regulatory environment has changed<br />
relative to that in other economies.<br />
DISTANCE TO FRONTIER<br />
The distance to frontier score captures<br />
the gap between an economy’s<br />
performance and a measure of best<br />
practice across the entire sample of 31<br />
indicators for 10 Doing Business topics<br />
(the labor market regulation indicators<br />
are excluded). For starting a business,<br />
for example, Canada and New Zealand<br />
have the smallest number of procedures<br />
required (1), and New Zealand the<br />
shortest time to fulfill them (0.5 days).<br />
Slovenia has the lowest cost (0.0),<br />
and Australia, Colombia and 110 other<br />
economies have no paid-in minimum<br />
capital requirement (table 15.1).<br />
Calculation of the distance to<br />
frontier score<br />
Calculating the distance to frontier<br />
score for each economy involves 2<br />
main steps. First, individual component<br />
indicators are normalized to a common<br />
unit where each of the 31 component<br />
indicators y (except for the total tax<br />
rate) is rescaled using the linear transformation<br />
(worst − y)/(worst − frontier).<br />
In this formulation the frontier represents<br />
the best performance on the indicator<br />
across all economies since 2005<br />
or the third year in which data for the<br />
indicator were collected. For legal indicators<br />
such as those on getting credit<br />
or protecting minority investors, the<br />
frontier is set at the highest possible<br />
value. For the total tax rate, consistent<br />
with the use of a threshold in calculating<br />
the rankings on this indicator, the<br />
frontier is defined as the total tax rate<br />
at the 15th percentile of the overall<br />
distribution for all years included in the<br />
analysis. For the time to pay taxes the<br />
frontier is defined as the lowest time<br />
recorded among all economies that<br />
levy the 3 major taxes: profit tax, labor<br />
taxes and mandatory contributions,<br />
and value added tax (VAT) or sales tax.<br />
In addition, the cost to export and cost<br />
to import for each year are divided by<br />
the GDP deflator, to take the general<br />
price level into account when benchmarking<br />
these absolute-cost indicators<br />
across economies with different<br />
inflation trends. The base year for the<br />
deflator is 2013 for all economies.<br />
In the same formulation, to mitigate<br />
the effects of extreme outliers in the