30.10.2014 Views

bc8G2-7

bc8G2-7

bc8G2-7

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Doing Business 2015<br />

Going Beyond Efficiency<br />

Distance to frontier and ease<br />

of doing business ranking<br />

This year’s report presents results<br />

for 2 aggregate measures:<br />

the distance to frontier score<br />

and the ease of doing business ranking,<br />

which for the first time this year<br />

is based on the distance to frontier<br />

score. The ease of doing business<br />

ranking compares economies with one<br />

another; the distance to frontier score<br />

benchmarks economies with respect<br />

to regulatory best practice, showing<br />

the absolute distance to the best<br />

performance on each Doing Business indicator.<br />

When compared across years,<br />

the distance to frontier score shows<br />

how much the regulatory environment<br />

for local entrepreneurs in an economy<br />

has changed over time in absolute<br />

terms, while the ease of doing business<br />

ranking can show only how much the<br />

regulatory environment has changed<br />

relative to that in other economies.<br />

DISTANCE TO FRONTIER<br />

The distance to frontier score captures<br />

the gap between an economy’s<br />

performance and a measure of best<br />

practice across the entire sample of 31<br />

indicators for 10 Doing Business topics<br />

(the labor market regulation indicators<br />

are excluded). For starting a business,<br />

for example, Canada and New Zealand<br />

have the smallest number of procedures<br />

required (1), and New Zealand the<br />

shortest time to fulfill them (0.5 days).<br />

Slovenia has the lowest cost (0.0),<br />

and Australia, Colombia and 110 other<br />

economies have no paid-in minimum<br />

capital requirement (table 15.1).<br />

Calculation of the distance to<br />

frontier score<br />

Calculating the distance to frontier<br />

score for each economy involves 2<br />

main steps. First, individual component<br />

indicators are normalized to a common<br />

unit where each of the 31 component<br />

indicators y (except for the total tax<br />

rate) is rescaled using the linear transformation<br />

(worst − y)/(worst − frontier).<br />

In this formulation the frontier represents<br />

the best performance on the indicator<br />

across all economies since 2005<br />

or the third year in which data for the<br />

indicator were collected. For legal indicators<br />

such as those on getting credit<br />

or protecting minority investors, the<br />

frontier is set at the highest possible<br />

value. For the total tax rate, consistent<br />

with the use of a threshold in calculating<br />

the rankings on this indicator, the<br />

frontier is defined as the total tax rate<br />

at the 15th percentile of the overall<br />

distribution for all years included in the<br />

analysis. For the time to pay taxes the<br />

frontier is defined as the lowest time<br />

recorded among all economies that<br />

levy the 3 major taxes: profit tax, labor<br />

taxes and mandatory contributions,<br />

and value added tax (VAT) or sales tax.<br />

In addition, the cost to export and cost<br />

to import for each year are divided by<br />

the GDP deflator, to take the general<br />

price level into account when benchmarking<br />

these absolute-cost indicators<br />

across economies with different<br />

inflation trends. The base year for the<br />

deflator is 2013 for all economies.<br />

In the same formulation, to mitigate<br />

the effects of extreme outliers in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!