The Russian system of chemicals management - Bef-de.org
The Russian system of chemicals management - Bef-de.org
The Russian system of chemicals management - Bef-de.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> NOED is then compared with threshold concentrations <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>anoleptic changes<br />
(LC <strong>org</strong><br />
) and changing sanitary regimes <strong>of</strong> a water body (LC san<br />
). <strong>The</strong> lowest <strong>of</strong> them is<br />
taken as MCP (or ODU) with indicating the relevant hazard category (i.e. MCP tox<br />
, MCP <strong>org</strong><br />
or MCP san<br />
). If the substance appears not to be <strong>de</strong>gradable, the safety factors indicated in<br />
Table 5 are applied, i.e. the MCP for extremely stable substances is reduced by 10 and<br />
for stable substances by 3.<br />
Fishery water MPCs are elaborated for substances to be discharged in water or if there<br />
is the risk that the substance reaches fishery waters. <strong>The</strong>re should be a request from an<br />
applicant in or<strong>de</strong>r to initiate the elaboration <strong>of</strong> the MPC for a specific substance.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no need to elaborate MPCs for inert and biologically inactive substances 17 like<br />
graphite type natural minerals, glass, etc., if sufficient evi<strong>de</strong>nce can be provi<strong>de</strong>d that they<br />
do not contain water-soluble toxic impurities. 18<br />
3.4. Summary: test methods and data analysis<br />
<strong>The</strong> test methods <strong>of</strong> toxicological (for hygienic assessment <strong>of</strong> water bodies) and ecotoxicological<br />
parameters have repeatedly been stated to be similar with EU ones. Also<br />
laboratories performing testing have to be accredited (so far according to ISO 17025,<br />
GLP <strong>system</strong> is being still introduced in Russia). Still, the testing results might be difficult<br />
to compare (<strong>de</strong>tails given in <strong>Russian</strong> methodological gui<strong>de</strong>lines were not compared with<br />
OECD testing gui<strong>de</strong>lines).<br />
If different species are used to test or data from different animals is already available, the<br />
lowest results are selected:<br />
1. From the chronic studies conducted on human health properties as well as aquatic<br />
toxicity and bioaccumulation, the LC 50<br />
and LC 0<br />
are <strong>de</strong>termined. <strong>The</strong> LC 0<br />
value for<br />
a specific effect is also called Lim sp.eff.<br />
and can be compared to the NOEL used in<br />
European <strong>chemicals</strong> assessment. <strong>The</strong> Lim value <strong>de</strong>termines the concentration or<br />
dose below which the specific effect cannot be observed.<br />
19<br />
2. <strong>The</strong> lowest minimal risk levels are then multiplied with specific coefficients to <strong>de</strong>rive<br />
so called „maximum permissible concentrations“ (MPCs). MPCs are <strong>de</strong>rived<br />
for fisheries waters and bathing waters, for workplace air and environmental air, for<br />
food and for soil. (see Chapter 3.4).<br />
17 Biologically inactive substance has LC 50<br />
≥ 1 000 mg/l for 96 h test. If there is no literature<br />
data, test is performed with zooplankton <strong>org</strong>anisms by the laboratory elaborating the MPC.<br />
18 Test performed by accredited laboratories<br />
19 <strong>The</strong> Lim values for the different specific effects tested are compared and the lowest concentration<br />
or dose is taken to <strong>de</strong>rive the MPC. If an MPC for workplace air is <strong>de</strong>rived, the<br />
respective test for selecting the Lim value would have to be an inhalation study.<br />
30 | <strong>The</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> System <strong>of</strong> Chemicals Management