07.11.2014 Views

World Energy Outlook 2011.pdf - Thomas Piketty

World Energy Outlook 2011.pdf - Thomas Piketty

World Energy Outlook 2011.pdf - Thomas Piketty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Underground mining methods (longwall, room and pillar) are comparatively more labourintensive<br />

than opencast methods (dragline, truck and shovel), where larger mining<br />

equipment can be utilised (Figure 11.7). Underground mining also depends more on steel,<br />

machinery and electricity. Unsurprisingly, explosives, tyres and diesel costs are significant<br />

in truck and shovel operations, while draglines are less diesel intensive, but electricity is a<br />

more important cost factor (Trüby and Paulus, 2011). Globally, prices for diesel, explosives,<br />

tyres, steel and machinery parts have increased dramatically since 2005. Consequently cash<br />

costs for opencast mining operations have increased sharply, due to their very high exposure<br />

to these input factors, notably in Indonesia, where mining is exclusively carried out using<br />

the truck and shovel method. The production of explosives and chemicals requires oil and<br />

natural gas as feedstock, so the future prices of these commodities will have an indirect, as<br />

well as direct impact on coal mining costs.<br />

Figure 11.7 Share of key input factors in coal mining costs by technique,<br />

2009<br />

50% Room and pillar<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

Longwall<br />

Dragline<br />

Truck and shovel<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Labour<br />

Steel<br />

products/<br />

machinery<br />

parts<br />

Electricity<br />

Chemicals<br />

Diesel/<br />

lubricants<br />

Explosives<br />

Tyres<br />

Other<br />

materials<br />

and<br />

services<br />

Source: IEA analysis based on data from the Institute of <strong>Energy</strong> Economics at the University of Cologne.<br />

11<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2011<br />

Coal mining productivity, measured as average production per employee per hour, has<br />

declined substantially over the past five years in major producing countries, such as<br />

Australia and the United States (Figure 11.8). While various factors (such as changes in<br />

international coal prices or the size of the workforce) contribute to changes in productivity,<br />

significant productivity deterioration can occur as existing coal deposits are exhausted,<br />

seams become thinner and mining operations move deeper. As more overburden has to be<br />

removed or trucks have to move coal over longer distances from the mine mouth, the cost<br />

of mining increases. For example, productivity in opencast mines in the major Australian<br />

mining state of Queensland fell, on average, by around 6% per year from 2003 to 2009,<br />

as existing deposits became depleted; nonetheless, Australian mines are still among the<br />

most productive in the world. During the same time period, productivity, on average, fell<br />

by around 4% per year in the United States, with notable falls in Appalachian underground<br />

mines – a region that has seen extensive coal mining since the 19 th century.<br />

Chapter 11 - Coal supply and investment prospects 409

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!