Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council
Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council
Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.2 (Contd) PART 2<br />
Discussion<br />
I consider that the main considerations in determining this application remain<br />
unchanged and are whether or not the proposed design of the buildings are<br />
suitable to the location, and whether or not the proposal, or the loss of the existing<br />
garages, will have any significant adverse impacts on the surrounding area.<br />
I consider the approved design of the proposed buildings is acceptable, The<br />
proposal offers a different type of dwelling to those which are currently available, and<br />
when the location of the site is considered, (centrally located within an existing<br />
estate), the proposed <strong>for</strong>m of development is more appropriate here than a proposal<br />
which would seek to replicate the existing buildings. Single storey bungalows, by<br />
their very nature have far less visual impact both in terms of overlooking<br />
neighbouring properties and also in terms of their intrusion upon the wider area, as<br />
opposed to two storey houses. The applicants in their previously submitted design<br />
and access statement in<strong>for</strong>med us that the buildings have been designed to meet a<br />
‘very good’ Eco-Homes Standard, minimising energy and water usage as well as<br />
measures to reduce energy construction during their construction. I there<strong>for</strong>e<br />
believe the scale and design of the development to be acceptable.<br />
Kent Highway Services, raise no objection to either the loss of the garages or to the<br />
amount of additional parking spaces that have been proposed.<br />
It is clear that the garages are in a state of disrepair and that it is not economically<br />
viable <strong>for</strong> them to remain in their current use. Many appear to have been boarded<br />
up <strong>for</strong> some time and parking seems to occur mainly on the surrounding streets.<br />
The applicants reiterate that the garages are at the end of their useful life and<br />
becoming unlettable due to their poor structural state.<br />
The applicants have submitted a supporting letter which explains that they have<br />
recently received funding from the Homes and Communities Agency to develop the<br />
site and are working with their consultants to tender the build contract but will not<br />
have let the contract in time to start work on the site by 1 May 2010 when the<br />
planning permission expires. Hence this application.<br />
It is my considered view that the proposal represents an opportunity to enhance the<br />
local environment whilst providing suitable accommodation <strong>for</strong> disabled people and<br />
more useable parking facilities <strong>for</strong> local residents.<br />
Recommendation<br />
The proposal site is within Faversham’s built up area, where the principle of new<br />
dwellings is acceptable. The proposal also seeks to provide some much needed<br />
social housing. Circumstances and planning policies have not changed materially<br />
since 2007 and I see no justification <strong>for</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> refusing planning permission<br />
now.<br />
Continued . . .<br />
15