08.11.2014 Views

Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council

Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council

Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2 (Contd) PART 2<br />

Discussion<br />

I consider that the main considerations in determining this application remain<br />

unchanged and are whether or not the proposed design of the buildings are<br />

suitable to the location, and whether or not the proposal, or the loss of the existing<br />

garages, will have any significant adverse impacts on the surrounding area.<br />

I consider the approved design of the proposed buildings is acceptable, The<br />

proposal offers a different type of dwelling to those which are currently available, and<br />

when the location of the site is considered, (centrally located within an existing<br />

estate), the proposed <strong>for</strong>m of development is more appropriate here than a proposal<br />

which would seek to replicate the existing buildings. Single storey bungalows, by<br />

their very nature have far less visual impact both in terms of overlooking<br />

neighbouring properties and also in terms of their intrusion upon the wider area, as<br />

opposed to two storey houses. The applicants in their previously submitted design<br />

and access statement in<strong>for</strong>med us that the buildings have been designed to meet a<br />

‘very good’ Eco-Homes Standard, minimising energy and water usage as well as<br />

measures to reduce energy construction during their construction. I there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

believe the scale and design of the development to be acceptable.<br />

Kent Highway Services, raise no objection to either the loss of the garages or to the<br />

amount of additional parking spaces that have been proposed.<br />

It is clear that the garages are in a state of disrepair and that it is not economically<br />

viable <strong>for</strong> them to remain in their current use. Many appear to have been boarded<br />

up <strong>for</strong> some time and parking seems to occur mainly on the surrounding streets.<br />

The applicants reiterate that the garages are at the end of their useful life and<br />

becoming unlettable due to their poor structural state.<br />

The applicants have submitted a supporting letter which explains that they have<br />

recently received funding from the Homes and Communities Agency to develop the<br />

site and are working with their consultants to tender the build contract but will not<br />

have let the contract in time to start work on the site by 1 May 2010 when the<br />

planning permission expires. Hence this application.<br />

It is my considered view that the proposal represents an opportunity to enhance the<br />

local environment whilst providing suitable accommodation <strong>for</strong> disabled people and<br />

more useable parking facilities <strong>for</strong> local residents.<br />

Recommendation<br />

The proposal site is within Faversham’s built up area, where the principle of new<br />

dwellings is acceptable. The proposal also seeks to provide some much needed<br />

social housing. Circumstances and planning policies have not changed materially<br />

since 2007 and I see no justification <strong>for</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> refusing planning permission<br />

now.<br />

Continued . . .<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!