08.11.2014 Views

Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council

Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council

Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.5 (Contd) PART 2<br />

it projects from the southwest half of the dwelling. The extension comprises two rear<br />

projections both of which would have dual pitched hipped roofs to match the pitch of<br />

the main dwelling. The proposed materials would match those of the existing<br />

dwelling.<br />

Two first floor windows would be added to the north east elevation of the property.<br />

Both windows would serve bathrooms.<br />

Relevant Site History & Description<br />

132 Borden Lane is a large two storey detached property set on a generous plot of<br />

land. The surrounding area is residential in nature and characterised by large<br />

detached dwellings set on large plots. The site is located within the built up area<br />

boundary of Borden as defined by the proposals map of the <strong>Swale</strong> <strong>Borough</strong> Local<br />

Plan 2008.<br />

A single storey rear projection has been demolished to enable the construction of the<br />

extension. The extension would be 2.5m from the common boundary with 134<br />

Borden Lane and 2 metres from the common boundary with 130 Borden Lane.<br />

The planning history <strong>for</strong> the application site is as follows;<br />

SW/75/0663- Garage and toilet extension- approved.<br />

SW/79/1572- Lounge extension and patio- approved.<br />

SW/80/0031- Alteration to front driveway- refused.<br />

SW/06/0275- First floor rear extension- approved.<br />

SW/10/0011- First floor rear extension- approved but not constructed. The current<br />

proposal would incorporate the approved first floor extension with the ground floor<br />

extension to <strong>for</strong>m the proposed 2 storey addition.<br />

Views of Consultees<br />

Borden Parish <strong>Council</strong> commented that:<br />

‘Borden Parish <strong>Council</strong> were able to discuss the above application and object on the<br />

grounds that the total size of the extension seems to exceed the designated<br />

allowance of 50% of the original building. They also felt that there is potential <strong>for</strong> it to<br />

overlook the neighbouring property and they are not happy that it is a retrospective<br />

application.’<br />

Kent County <strong>Council</strong> Archaeological Officer raised no objection.<br />

Other Representations<br />

No other representations received.<br />

Continued . . .<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!