Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council
Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council
Report for Item 6 - Swale Borough Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.6 (Contd) PART 2<br />
• Detrimental effect on the adjoining conservation area.<br />
• The business plan does not include all set up costs.<br />
• The proposed site plan is incorrect – the site is not adjacent to Wardwell<br />
Lane.<br />
• The proposal would have a detrimental effect on the conservation area.<br />
• The business plan does not include an upfront cost <strong>for</strong> the 12,000 chickens.<br />
The Environment Agency raise no objections.<br />
Southern Gas Networks notes that there is a Low/Medium/Intermediate Pressure<br />
gas main in the proximity of the application site. No mechanical excavations are to<br />
take place above or within 0.5m of the Low pressure and medium pressure system<br />
and 3 metres of the intermediate pressure system. Safe digging practices should be<br />
adopted.<br />
Natural England has no comment to make on the proposal. They do note however,<br />
that if the <strong>Council</strong> is aware of the presence of any protected species on the site then<br />
the Standing Advice should be referred to. Biodiversity enhancements are<br />
suggested.<br />
The Head of Environmental Services has no objection to the proposal. However,<br />
they recommend conditions to ensure that loading and unloading deliveries or<br />
collections only take place within restricted hours and that the details of any<br />
mechanical ventilation system are agreed be<strong>for</strong>e they are installed.<br />
The <strong>Council</strong>’s agricultural consultant has raised the following comments:<br />
• The design and size of the building appears in accord with what would<br />
typically provide <strong>for</strong> a modern unit of this size and type. The building is<br />
there<strong>for</strong>e necessary <strong>for</strong> the applicant’s farming plans.<br />
• The applicant has secured a successful outlet <strong>for</strong> the eggs in principle and a<br />
source <strong>for</strong> much of the funding <strong>for</strong> the required capital investment has been<br />
identified. There appears to be clear evidence of a firm intention and ability to<br />
develop the enterprise.<br />
• The operation of the free-range unit would generate an essential functional<br />
requirement <strong>for</strong> someone to be resident on the site at most times <strong>for</strong> the<br />
proper care of the hens. This would enable a speedy response in the event<br />
that the hens were attacked or panicked by other intrusion or sudden noise,<br />
and would provide close attention to their environment, particularly when shut<br />
up at night to ensure ventilation and watering is adequate. Residential<br />
attendance also provides necessary cover in the event of a fire, storm and<br />
from trespassers. DEFRA’s Welfare Code <strong>for</strong> laying hens does not specifically<br />
state that on-site residence is an essential condition on all free-range units,<br />
however the required standards relating to environment and husbandry,<br />
together with fire and other emergency safety precautions, amount to a strong<br />
case <strong>for</strong> on-site residence. The DEFRA requirements would make it difficult<br />
<strong>for</strong> someone living elsewhere in the area, with no direct visible or audible<br />
contact with what is happening on site, to meet the Welfare Code.<br />
Continued . . .<br />
37