09.11.2014 Views

Barrie Creeks, Lovers Creek, and Hewitt's Creek Subwatershed Plan

Barrie Creeks, Lovers Creek, and Hewitt's Creek Subwatershed Plan

Barrie Creeks, Lovers Creek, and Hewitt's Creek Subwatershed Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong>, <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>and</strong> Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Subwatershed</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Where 90% of samples at Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>and</strong> 70% of samples at <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> meet long term<br />

exposure chloride guidelines, only 7% of the samples collected at Hotchkiss <strong>Creek</strong> meet the<br />

objective (Table 3-4). The CWQG also use a short term, or acute, exposure guideline of 586<br />

mg/L which estimates the point at which severe effects to the aquatic ecosystem are likely to<br />

occur over a 24 to 96 hour exposure period (Table 3-1). From 2008 to 2010, nine samples<br />

(10%) exceeded this guideline at Hotchkiss <strong>Creek</strong> while no exceedances occurred at <strong>Lovers</strong><br />

<strong>Creek</strong> or Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong>.<br />

Table 3-4: Surface water quality comparison for <strong>Lovers</strong>, Hewitt’s, <strong>and</strong> Hotchkiss <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong> (2008-<br />

2010).<br />

Monitoring Station<br />

Current Conditions (2008-2010).<br />

Percentage of samples that meet objectives<br />

Orange = median concentration > objective<br />

Green = median concentration < objective<br />

Chloride<br />

Phosphorus<br />

Nitrate<br />

TSS<br />

Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong> 90 55 82 89<br />

Hotchkiss <strong>Creek</strong> 7 59 99 86<br />

<strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> 70 60 100 87<br />

Objective 128 mg/L 0.03 mg/L 2.9 mg/L 30 mg/L<br />

3.2.3.1. Phosphorus<br />

As the historic concentrations at <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> are<br />

unusually low compared to just about everywhere else in<br />

the watershed, it is one of the few tributaries showing an<br />

increasing trend in phosphorus concentrations when<br />

examining the entire period of record. While this is a<br />

concern, it is important to realize that while more rapid<br />

development in the subwatershed is likely causing this<br />

increase, the total phosphorus load from the <strong>Lovers</strong><br />

<strong>Creek</strong> subwatershed only makes up 1.4% of the total<br />

load going into Lake Simcoe each year (discussed<br />

further in the Stressors section of this chapter). For<br />

comparison, the Beaver River, which today has relatively<br />

low concentrations <strong>and</strong> shows a declining trend, had<br />

much higher concentrations through the 1970s <strong>and</strong><br />

1980s, the majority of which exceeded the guideline<br />

(Figure 3-2).<br />

Reading & Interpreting Box Plots<br />

A box plot presents a data set in<br />

graphical form. The shaded portion<br />

of the box represents the middle<br />

50% of the data set showing where<br />

the majority of the values fall <strong>and</strong><br />

the spread of the data. The line in<br />

the box is the median (50 th<br />

percentile) of the data set. The<br />

whiskers show the lower <strong>and</strong> upper<br />

quartiles of the data set. The points<br />

above <strong>and</strong> below the whiskers<br />

represent outliers in the data set at<br />

the 5th <strong>and</strong> 95th percentile. A red<br />

line has also been included to<br />

highlight the applicable guideline<br />

for the parameter.<br />

Chapter 3: Water Quality – Surface <strong>and</strong> Groundwater 85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!