09.11.2014 Views

Barrie Creeks, Lovers Creek, and Hewitt's Creek Subwatershed Plan

Barrie Creeks, Lovers Creek, and Hewitt's Creek Subwatershed Plan

Barrie Creeks, Lovers Creek, and Hewitt's Creek Subwatershed Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 3-10: Percent phosphorus loads to Lake Simcoe per subwatershed under committed growth<br />

scenario (data: Berger, 2010). 97<br />

Figure 3-11: Phosphorus loading (kg/yr) per hectare under current conditions for each Lake Simcoe<br />

subwatershed (data: Berger, 2010). 100<br />

Figure 3-12: <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong> subwatershed agricultural BMP scenario total phosphorus loads<br />

(Berger, 2010). 102<br />

Figure 3-13: <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong> subwatershed target total phosphorus loads (Berger, 2010). 103<br />

Figure 3-14: <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> subwatershed agricultural BMP scenario total phosphorus loads<br />

(Berger, 2010). 104<br />

Figure 3-15: <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> subwatershed target total phosphorus loads (Berger, 2010). 105<br />

Figure 3-16: Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong> subwatershed agricultural BMP scenario total phosphorus loads<br />

(Berger, 2010). 106<br />

Figure 3-17: Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong> subwatershed target total phosphorus loads (Berger, 2010). 107<br />

Figure 3-18: Modelled chloride loads for several Lake Simcoe subwatersheds (tonnes/year)<br />

(1998-2007) 108<br />

Figure 3-19: <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong> - pond design efficiency level vs. 2010 surveyed efficiency level. 116<br />

Figure 3-20: <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> - pond design efficiency level vs. 2010 surveyed efficiency level. 116<br />

Figure 3-21: Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong> - pond design efficiency level vs. 2010 surveyed efficiency level. 117<br />

Figure 3-22: Stormwater control in the <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong>, <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>and</strong> Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong><br />

subwatersheds. 119<br />

Figure 3-23: Uncontrolled stormwater <strong>and</strong> retrofit opportunities in the <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong>, <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong> subwatersheds. 120<br />

Figure 3-24: Base case l<strong>and</strong> use applied to climate change scenarios for total phosphorus loads in<br />

the <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong> subwatershed (Berger, 2011). 122<br />

Figure 3-25: Base case l<strong>and</strong> use applied to climate change scenarios for total phosphorus loads in<br />

the <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> subwatershed (Berger, 2011). 122<br />

Figure 3-26: Base case l<strong>and</strong> use applied to climate change scenarios for total phosphorus loads in<br />

the Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong> subwatershed (Berger, 2011). 123<br />

Table of Contents

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!