09.11.2014 Views

Barrie Creeks, Lovers Creek, and Hewitt's Creek Subwatershed Plan

Barrie Creeks, Lovers Creek, and Hewitt's Creek Subwatershed Plan

Barrie Creeks, Lovers Creek, and Hewitt's Creek Subwatershed Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong>, <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>and</strong> Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Subwatershed</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

5.2.3 Rare <strong>and</strong> Endangered Species<br />

There are no known aquatic Species at Risk in the <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong>, <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong>, or Hewitt’s<br />

<strong>Creek</strong> subwatersheds.<br />

Key Points - Current Aquatic Natural Heritage Status:<br />

• While there are no specific studies on the spawning of species for these<br />

subwatersheds, there is evidence indicating that brook trout may be successfully<br />

spawning <strong>and</strong> surviving in Kidd’s <strong>and</strong> Whiskey <strong>Creek</strong>.<br />

• <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong> is a diverse area with six main (<strong>and</strong> two smaller) tributaries spread<br />

across the subwatershed. The conditions of the creeks varies from Sophia <strong>Creek</strong>,<br />

which is in the poorest condition with no fish having been captured <strong>and</strong> much of the<br />

watercourse being altered, to Whiskey <strong>and</strong> Kidd’s <strong>Creek</strong>, which both have generally<br />

good conditions near the mouth but poorer conditions closer to the headwaters.<br />

• Kidd’s, Hotchkiss <strong>and</strong> Whiskey <strong><strong>Creek</strong>s</strong> all have historical presence of brook trout (a<br />

key indicator species), with only Hotchkiss no longer having a current population.<br />

Hotchkiss does have historical <strong>and</strong> current presence of mottled sculpin though, as<br />

does Whiskey <strong>Creek</strong>.<br />

• The condition of <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong>, with 26 monitoring stations, varies along the main<br />

branch <strong>and</strong> along the tributaries. Fish <strong>and</strong> benthic data are somewhat different in<br />

their results. Along the main branch fish communities average around ‘fair’. For<br />

benthic communities, sites are ranked as ‘very good’ near the mouth, while they vary<br />

between ‘fairly poor’ <strong>and</strong> ‘good’ in the headwaters on the various branches.<br />

• <strong>Lovers</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> has both historical <strong>and</strong> current presence of the key indicator species,<br />

brook trout <strong>and</strong> mottled sculpin. Each of current populations are in the same areas<br />

as their historic populations, with the exception of brook trout which are no longer<br />

found in the headwaters<br />

• Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong>, with 14 monitoring sites, also has a varied rating along the main<br />

branch, but averages around fair. Even though there are few barriers to fish<br />

movement <strong>and</strong> little bank hardening or channelization, the ecological integrity of the<br />

system, based on the analyses of the fish <strong>and</strong> benthic communities, range from poor<br />

to excellent.<br />

• Hewitt’s <strong>Creek</strong> has both historical <strong>and</strong> current presence of the key indicator species,<br />

brook trout <strong>and</strong> mottled sculpin, with each of current populations in the same areas<br />

as their historic populations.<br />

• While Figure 5-2 shows the general shifts in fish community composition within a<br />

system – from sites with cold water species to the next sites with only warm water<br />

(generalist) species, currently data is not available to pinpoint when shifts take place<br />

<strong>and</strong> what caused them to do so.<br />

• The lake nearshore community around the City of <strong>Barrie</strong> shoreline is in relatively<br />

poor condition based on having a substantial increase in plant biomass, high<br />

sediment nutrient concentrations <strong>and</strong> presence of aquatic invasive species.<br />

Chapter 5: Aquatic Natural Heritage 224

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!