NAVAL AVIATION SYSTEMS - NASA Wiki
NAVAL AVIATION SYSTEMS - NASA Wiki
NAVAL AVIATION SYSTEMS - NASA Wiki
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chairperson), (2) the assigned Assistant Program Manager for Logistics (APML) from AIR-3.0, (3) the assigned<br />
Assistant Program Manager for Systems Engineering (Class Desk) from AIR-4.0, (4) the assigned Assistant<br />
Program Manager for Contracts (PCO) from AIR-2.0, (5) the PID originator, and (6) a representative from Office<br />
of Counsel (AIR-7.7). If formal source selection procedures may be required, a representative from AIR-4.10C<br />
should be included as a member of the PPC. Additional members may be invited to attend at the discretion of the<br />
PM. For smaller procurements, full attendance by all of the above cited representatives may not be required.<br />
Procurement Planning Agreements: The PPA represents an informal "contract" among the PPC principals. It<br />
identifies events and projected dates required to affect timely contract award, and records action assignments as a<br />
result of discussions held to establish an appropriate procurement strategy. NAVAIRINST 4200.34A and<br />
NAVAIRINST 4200.37 provide guidance for PPAs. Upon approval, copies of the PPA are provided to the PPC<br />
principals.<br />
Responsibilities: The PM is responsible for calling the PPC, preparing and coordinating the PPA, distributing<br />
copies to all participants, and holding the procurement team accountable for schedule and products. Command<br />
purchase request (PR) control points are responsible to ensure that one of the following has been provided prior to<br />
issuance of a PR number to the PID originator: (1) a completed PPA, (2) a decision memorandum (for change<br />
control board related activities), or (3) verification that no PPC (or similar review)/PPA is required. The following<br />
page provides the PID numbering scheme and attendant PPC requirements. PPC attendees are expected to be<br />
trained and certified with their functional policies/procedures for the competencies they represent and be<br />
empowered to make commitments on behalf of the functional competency manager. This will reduce and/or<br />
virtually eliminate the need for subsequent staffing of the PID to higher management levels within the competency.<br />
Lessons-Learned:<br />
1) Too often, PPCs are held for the primary purpose of establishing schedule agreements. While this may be<br />
appropriate for routine/follow-on procurements, it is inadequate for new procurements or procurements facing<br />
unique issues. NAVAIRINST 4200.34A provides a recommended checklist of discussion topics which should be<br />
reviewed and discussed to surface issues that could impact the PID process and affect timely contract award/fiscal<br />
obligation.<br />
2) While PPC-type reviews should precede each procurement, the review and the required participants should be<br />
tailored for each requirement. PPCs for routine follow-on procurements will differ from new procurements. Some<br />
procurement actions may not necessitate the need for a formal PPC (e.g., admin changes, changes to CDRL,<br />
funding documents, etc). However, this should be verified by the PM (or designated IPT representative) prior to<br />
issuance of the PR number and initiation of the PID. Additionally, the PM should recommend a PPC if<br />
programmatic changes are encountered that may impact the procurement strategy or schedule.<br />
3) PPC attendees should be knowledgeable of the practices and policies of their competency. The PM has the<br />
right to expect procurement team members to be skilled in their respective areas and able to contribute to a<br />
quality product. Additionally, the PM must be able to expect schedule adherence by the procurement team<br />
members to a plan of action and milestones mutually agreed to by PPC participants<br />
POC: Gerry Cecala, AIR-1.3, 301-757-9094, Bldg 441<br />
31