10.11.2014 Views

NAVAL AVIATION SYSTEMS - NASA Wiki

NAVAL AVIATION SYSTEMS - NASA Wiki

NAVAL AVIATION SYSTEMS - NASA Wiki

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

When chartered by AIR-1.3 PMs have approval authority for proposed design changes to cognizant material items.<br />

However, they must follow the requirement of NAVAIRINST 4130.1C, which requires that a formal CCB,<br />

including applicable operating procedures, must be established to disposition all proposed Class I ECPs. It also<br />

states that cognizant program managers are responsible for ensuring that all four of the above CM elements are<br />

properly implemented throughout the life cycle of assigned material items(s).<br />

Lessons Learned:<br />

1) All programs, whether compartmented or classified programs, must comply with established CM policy and<br />

procedures which require approved OPR CM plans. Past programs which failed to comply have often experienced<br />

costly logistics support problems by delivering weapon systems that are not supportable to the fleet. This practice<br />

greatly diminishes the war fighting capabilities of the Navy.<br />

2) The deliberate misclassification and/or downgrading of Class I ECPs to Class II may often result in costly<br />

logistics problems as outlined above.<br />

3) The Rapid Action Minor Engineering Changes (RAMEC) program is sometimes abused when RAMEC's are<br />

used to retrofit Class I production ECP's that are misclassified or have improperly downgraded to Class II. This<br />

practice has a tendency to drive life-cycle program costs up by using operational personnel to perform various<br />

production/retrofit tasks.<br />

POC: John B. Jones, AIR-1.3.3, 301-757-9090, bldg 441<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!