10.11.2014 Views

SME Finance Policy Guide

SME Finance Policy Guide

SME Finance Policy Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

G-20 <strong>SME</strong> FINANCE POLICY GUIDE<br />

71<br />

costs, given that the financing structure and related<br />

contractual arrangements and procedures for monitoring<br />

and enforcement need to be tailored to a specific<br />

situation. Moreover, many financial institutions lack<br />

sufficient knowledge about value chain financing techniques<br />

and the skills to apply them.<br />

Leasing offers the potential to reduce some of the risks<br />

of traditional loan provision for investment financing<br />

in agriculture. Leasing can provide an alternative<br />

financing solution for smallholder farmers and rural<br />

enterprises with limited collateral and credit history<br />

for the acquisition of equipment and other production<br />

assets. It helps to circumvent some of the problems<br />

related to the registration and foreclosure of collateral<br />

and can be used for financing machinery and movable<br />

assets such as vehicles and farm equipment. Since the<br />

lessor owns the equipment, repossession in case of<br />

default is more straightforward as it does not require<br />

court procedures. Leaseback enables rural entrepreneurs<br />

to access funds by selling a productive asset to<br />

the lessor, who then leases it back to the lessee. At the<br />

end of the stipulated period, the lessor sells the asset<br />

back to the lessee at a pre-determined price. The use of<br />

leasing and leaseback is greatly facilitated by a suitable<br />

legal framework stipulating the rights and obligations<br />

of both parties. However, tax regulations can make<br />

leasing less lucrative than lending. Despite the advantages<br />

of leasing in principle, few institutions offer<br />

equipment leasing and leaseback to rural customers.<br />

A further policy instrument to stimulate medium- and<br />

long-term agrifinance lending can be agricultural<br />

guarantee funds. Guarantees may provide additional<br />

comfort for financial institutions interested in testing<br />

the feasibility of lending to a new clientele, but a guarantee<br />

alone is unlikely to induce additional lending if<br />

the lenders lack such interest. International agencies<br />

can perform a valuable service by conducting evaluations<br />

to determine if and under what conditions guarantees<br />

produce the expected results and how the details<br />

of guarantee designs affect performance. It is also critical<br />

to evaluate whether they distort markets and discourage<br />

private credit market development.<br />

Index-based crop insurance shows promise in overcoming<br />

some of the risk related constraints. Indemnity<br />

payments are triggered by deviations from an independently<br />

verifiable indicator such as rainfall data<br />

measured at local weather stations, and not by on-site<br />

loss assessments. Weather-index insurance thus offers<br />

the promise of reducing the administrative, adverse<br />

selection, and moral hazard problems of traditional<br />

insurance. Different indices can be used, such as<br />

rainfall, temperature, or livestock mortality, as long<br />

as they are highly correlated with regional farm yields<br />

and are accurately and objectively measurable.<br />

However, weather index based insurance has its own<br />

operational challenges. Not all pilot programs have<br />

been successful and the scalability of the successful<br />

pilots has not yet been proven.<br />

Challenges and priorities for LDCs<br />

The challenges of providing financial services to agricultural<br />

enterprises are wide ranging, and can be more<br />

severe in LDC rural sectors. The dispersed location of<br />

rural clients, the difficulties and high costs of transportation<br />

and communication, the heterogeneity in<br />

farming activities, and the level of management skills<br />

make small farm lending a costly endeavour. The high<br />

agricultural production risks, further complicated by<br />

the sensitive political nature of agriculture and domestic<br />

food production, explain why lending to agriculture<br />

is risky. All of these challenges are present at<br />

different levels of the financial system, the policy level,<br />

the financial infrastructure level, and the level of financial<br />

institutions.<br />

Financing agricultural <strong>SME</strong>s requires both <strong>SME</strong> finance<br />

and knowledge about the agricultural sector. However,<br />

in many LDCs, financial institutions know very little<br />

about agriculture and lack the specific agricultural risk<br />

management skills, suitable products, and term liabilities<br />

to finance agricultural <strong>SME</strong>s. On the demand side,<br />

agricultural <strong>SME</strong>s frequently lack the required financial<br />

data, business plans, marketing tools, and sufficiently<br />

powerful projects to convince financial<br />

institutions to provide adequate funding.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!