10.11.2014 Views

Click here to view complete journal in pdf-format - IAMSE

Click here to view complete journal in pdf-format - IAMSE

Click here to view complete journal in pdf-format - IAMSE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR<br />

The Journal of the International Association of Medical Science Educa<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

Med Sci Educ 2012; 22(4S), 270-271<br />

2012 POSTER AWARD<br />

Assessment of an Adjusted vs. Fixed Pass L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

for Student Performance <strong>in</strong> a Medical School<br />

Curriculum<br />

Andreas Seyfang, Stanley J. Nazian, Samuel Saporta, Craig A. Doupnik,<br />

William E. Johnson & Frazier T. Stevenson<br />

University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Tampa, FL, USA<br />

Start<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Fall 2011, USF Morsani College of<br />

Medic<strong>in</strong>e has implemented a new pass-fail grad<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system us<strong>in</strong>g an adjusted pass l<strong>in</strong>e for the<br />

assignment of grades <strong>in</strong> Year 1 basic science courses,<br />

which <strong>in</strong>corporates the class mean and distribution<br />

of exam grades (‘mean m<strong>in</strong>us two standard<br />

deviations’ pass l<strong>in</strong>e). This replaces the prior fixed<br />

pass l<strong>in</strong>e of 70% correct answers. In recent reports,<br />

improved psychological well-be<strong>in</strong>g (reduced stress<br />

and anxiety) and decreased competitiveness,<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed with an environment that fosters<br />

cooperative learn<strong>in</strong>g were discussed as major<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>rs and pr<strong>in</strong>cipal attractions <strong>in</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>ward a<br />

simple pass-fail grad<strong>in</strong>g system. 1,2 Here, we report<br />

on resultant changes <strong>in</strong> class performance dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the academic year 2011-2012.<br />

Student performance <strong>in</strong> each of the four courses of<br />

Year 1 was evaluated based on 3-4 exams per<br />

course. The adjusted pass l<strong>in</strong>e was calculated at the<br />

end of each course as the percentage of class mean<br />

of correct answers m<strong>in</strong>us 2 standard deviations.<br />

Students that scored below the pass l<strong>in</strong>e had <strong>to</strong> take<br />

a comprehensive remediation exam for that course<br />

with<strong>in</strong> one week. For the remediation exams, the<br />

fixed 70% correct answers pass l<strong>in</strong>e was used.<br />

The adjusted pass l<strong>in</strong>es for the four courses of Year 1<br />

were 76%, 79%, 78% and 72%, respectively, based<br />

on remarkably high and homogeneous mean class<br />

performances (means of 87.4%, 88.1%, 87.3%, and<br />

84.3%) comb<strong>in</strong>ed with a small grade distribution<br />

range (SDs of 5.7%, 4.7%, 4.9%, and 6.0%). Out of<br />

Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author: Andreas Seyfang, PhD, Department of<br />

Molecular Medic<strong>in</strong>e, University of South Florida Morsani College<br />

of Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., MDC7, Tampa, FL<br />

33612, USA. Tel: +1-813-974-2332, E-mail:<br />

aseyfang@health.usf.edu<br />

the 141 medical students <strong>to</strong>tal, 4, 2, 2 and 2<br />

students, respectively, scored below the adjusted<br />

‘mean – 2 SD’ pass l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Courses 1-4, and all<br />

subsequently passed their remediation exams. For<br />

comparison, if the fixed 70% pass l<strong>in</strong>e system would<br />

have been implemented, these numbers would have<br />

been 1, 0, 0 and 2 students fall<strong>in</strong>g below the pass<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> these courses (Table 1).<br />

We conclude that an adjusted pass l<strong>in</strong>e for course<br />

evaluation better responds <strong>to</strong> variability <strong>in</strong> class<br />

performance between different courses. It also<br />

allowed for earlier identification and remedial<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention for students with lower performance,<br />

<strong>in</strong> particular when comb<strong>in</strong>ed with moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

feedback of student competencies <strong>to</strong> ensure<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>e proficiency. 3<br />

References<br />

1. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical<br />

Student Distress: Causes, Consequences, and<br />

Proposed Solutions. Mayo Cl<strong>in</strong>. Proc. 2005;<br />

80:1613-1622.<br />

2. Bloodgood RA, Short JG, Jackson JM,<br />

Mart<strong>in</strong>dale JR. A Change <strong>to</strong> Pass/Fail Grad<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> the First Two Years at One Medical School<br />

Results <strong>in</strong> Improved Psychological Well-Be<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Acad. Med. 2009; 84(5):655-662.<br />

3. Nazian SJ, Stevenson FT. Use of Competencies<br />

<strong>to</strong> Insure Discipl<strong>in</strong>e Proficiency <strong>in</strong> an Integrated<br />

Organ Based Curriculum. (15th Annual <strong>IAMSE</strong><br />

Meet<strong>in</strong>g, St. Petersburg, FL) Med. Sci. Edu.<br />

2011; 21(3S):302.<br />

Keywords<br />

Assessment<br />

Medical Science Educa<strong>to</strong>r © <strong>IAMSE</strong> 2012 Volume 22(4S) 270

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!