10.11.2014 Views

Click here to view complete journal in pdf-format - IAMSE

Click here to view complete journal in pdf-format - IAMSE

Click here to view complete journal in pdf-format - IAMSE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>to</strong> class attendance, about 80% of 2nd-year students<br />

were present (72.6%). Learn<strong>in</strong>g style could be<br />

categorized <strong>in</strong> four fairly similar dimensions: (1)<br />

solitary study (56.08%, 52.65%); (2) study<strong>in</strong>g facts<br />

(52.08%, 66.95%); (3) us<strong>in</strong>g illustrations (63.52%,<br />

52.25%); and, (4) whole system conceptualization<br />

(51.76%, 56.9%).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Tape transcription was the favorite method of study.<br />

Second-year students began serious exam<br />

preparations two weeks before and they were also<br />

more faithful about class attendance (>80%).<br />

Student used four learn<strong>in</strong>g styles <strong>to</strong> help <strong>to</strong><br />

memorize the curricular material.<br />

Assessment Abstract ID: 116<br />

FACTORS RELAVANT TO STUDENT’S<br />

SATISFACTION IN A NEWLY OPENED<br />

MEDICAL EDUCATION CENTER<br />

Sukanya Paileeklee and Supaluk Raiyawa.<br />

UdonThani Medical Education Center, UdonThani,<br />

Thailand<br />

PURPOSE<br />

The UdonThani Medical Education Center has<br />

newly started Cl<strong>in</strong>ical year teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2009. This<br />

study aimed <strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>rs relevant <strong>to</strong> student’s<br />

satisfaction <strong>to</strong> improve teach<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

METHODS<br />

Small groups of focal po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>ter<strong>view</strong>s were<br />

conducted <strong>to</strong> elicit fac<strong>to</strong>rs relevant <strong>to</strong> student’s<br />

satisfaction. Then, questionnaire was developed,<br />

comprised of satisfaction with teach<strong>in</strong>g style,<br />

<strong>in</strong>struc<strong>to</strong>r, and department, with 5 levels of Likert’s<br />

scale rat<strong>in</strong>g. Data were collected from 5 th year<br />

medical student <strong>in</strong> 2011.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The fac<strong>to</strong>rs related <strong>to</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g style were be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

punctual, class postponed or cancelled, well<br />

prepared lesson, provid<strong>in</strong>g teach<strong>in</strong>g objectives and<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g material, and, unfair grad<strong>in</strong>g. The fac<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

related <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>struc<strong>to</strong>r were be<strong>in</strong>g rigorous,<br />

understandable explanation, opportunity <strong>to</strong><br />

feedback, comprehensive content, personality and<br />

competency. The response rate was 80.0% (24/30).<br />

The major relevant fac<strong>to</strong>rs related <strong>to</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g style<br />

were well prepared lesson, provid<strong>in</strong>g teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

objectives and material, class postponed or<br />

cancelled, mean score of 4.33, 4.25 and 4.21,<br />

respectively. The major relevant fac<strong>to</strong>rs related <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>struc<strong>to</strong>rs were competency, understandable<br />

explanation, provid<strong>in</strong>g comprehensive content,<br />

mean score of 4.63, 4.63 and 4.13 respectively.<br />

Department of O<strong>to</strong>rh<strong>in</strong>olaryngology, got highest<br />

satisfaction means score of 4.83, followed by<br />

Obstetric-Gynecology, Anesthetic, and<br />

Rehabilitation, score 4.46, 4.43 and 4.21<br />

respectively.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The major relevant fac<strong>to</strong>rs were <strong>in</strong>struc<strong>to</strong>r’s<br />

competency, understandable explanation, well<br />

prepared lesson, and provid<strong>in</strong>g comprehensive<br />

content. Students were most satisfied with<br />

department of O<strong>to</strong>rh<strong>in</strong>olaryngology.<br />

Assessment Abstract ID: 117<br />

USING AUDIENCE RESPONSE QUESTIONS<br />

TO ASSESS STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN A<br />

YEAR 1 NEUROSCIENCE COURSE, II<br />

Samuel Saporta, University of South Florida,<br />

Tampa FL, USA<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Little data exists regard<strong>in</strong>g the level of student<br />

preparation and successful completion of the first<br />

year of medical school. In an attempt <strong>to</strong> assess<br />

student educational background and student<br />

performance, audience response questions <strong>to</strong><br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e specific student background were akse<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g active learn<strong>in</strong>g sessions <strong>in</strong> a year 1 Medical<br />

Neuroscience course. Data were gat<strong>here</strong>d over two<br />

academic years.<br />

METHODS<br />

Demographic data provided by 319 medical<br />

students were analyzed aga<strong>in</strong>st their performance <strong>in</strong><br />

active learn<strong>in</strong>g sessions and f<strong>in</strong>al course grade.<br />

Complete data were collected for 211 medical<br />

students. The Spearman Rank Correlation (r) and<br />

Wilcoxon Rank Sign Tests for paired data were used<br />

<strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e covariance and statistical significance.<br />

RESULTS<br />

T<strong>here</strong> was a statistically significant covariance <strong>in</strong><br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed data between students who had an<br />

advanced degree and f<strong>in</strong>al course grade (r=0.3598;<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!