10.11.2014 Views

Click here to view complete journal in pdf-format - IAMSE

Click here to view complete journal in pdf-format - IAMSE

Click here to view complete journal in pdf-format - IAMSE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

four students <strong>complete</strong> a personal improvement<br />

project (PIP) <strong>to</strong> apply these concepts <strong>to</strong> a personal<br />

change such as diet or sleep patterns.<br />

Professionalism, communication, and patientcenteredness<br />

are also covered <strong>in</strong> all <strong>in</strong>structional<br />

modalities.<br />

RESULTS<br />

By December 2011, the 1st cohort of 219 students<br />

had <strong>complete</strong>d four semesters, and two cohorts,<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal<strong>in</strong>g 602 students had <strong>complete</strong>d three<br />

semesters of the new curriculum. The average class<br />

score on MCQs over the four semesters was 66.2%<br />

for improvement <strong>in</strong> practice, 71.6 % for RCC, and<br />

64.3 % for SBP. Faculty evaluation of the PIPs<br />

showed that students grasped the concepts, made<br />

use of techniques such as cause and effect diagrams,<br />

and reflected on the challenges of mak<strong>in</strong>g change<br />

even <strong>in</strong> a personal system.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Precl<strong>in</strong>ical medical students demonstrated<br />

knowledge of the core competencies and can apply<br />

key pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong> their personal improvement<br />

projects, simulation and PBL. A future challenge<br />

will be <strong>to</strong> assess retention and application of these<br />

concepts <strong>in</strong> later years.<br />

Curriculum Abstract ID: 141 Award Nom<strong>in</strong>ee<br />

DOWNLOADING LEARNING OBJECTIVES<br />

INCREASES STUDENT EXAM SCORES IN<br />

AN INTEGRATED COURSE: PILOT STUDY<br />

Jeffrey T. Holt M.D.; Mark V. White M.D., Mph;<br />

Ray A Smego M.D., Mph; John L Szarek Ph.D. The<br />

Commonwealth Medical College. Scran<strong>to</strong>n, PA,<br />

USA<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Although most basic science medical education is<br />

based on learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives it is unclear whether<br />

students actually use them <strong>to</strong> organize their<br />

study<strong>in</strong>g. We hypothesized that students who<br />

<strong>view</strong>ed learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives would learn more than<br />

those who didn’t. To test this hypothesis, we<br />

compared the exam performance of students who<br />

downloaded learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives with those who<br />

didn’t.<br />

METHODS<br />

Blackboard can be set <strong>to</strong> track when and if medical<br />

students download or access specific documents.<br />

We utilized this feature <strong>to</strong> identify which second<br />

year medical students downloaded <strong>to</strong>pic specific<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives prior <strong>to</strong> an exam test<strong>in</strong>g higher<br />

order (Bloom’s taxonomy) subject knowledge. We<br />

compared end-of-module exam scores of students<br />

who downloaded learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives (downloaders)<br />

which those who did not (non-downloaders).<br />

Results<br />

Learn<strong>in</strong>g objective downloaders had higher mean<br />

exam scores (79.7% ± 1.09 SEM; n = 39) than nondownloaders<br />

(71.0% ± 1.77 SEM; n = 24; p =<br />

0.0001). Dur<strong>in</strong>g the exam<strong>in</strong>ation re<strong>view</strong> session we<br />

rem<strong>in</strong>ded the students that each test question was<br />

based on a specific learn<strong>in</strong>g objective and provided<br />

examples. Follow<strong>in</strong>g this exam the percentage of<br />

students download<strong>in</strong>g learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

from the observed 62% <strong>to</strong> greater than 90%. This<br />

level of greater than 90% download<strong>in</strong>g of learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

objectives has been stable for the subsequent 3<br />

months.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Download<strong>in</strong>g of learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives by Year 2<br />

medical students appears <strong>to</strong> be associated with<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased mean exam scores and was associated<br />

with cont<strong>in</strong>ued download<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> subsequent<br />

modules. The question rema<strong>in</strong>s, however, whether<br />

students use the objectives <strong>in</strong> preparation for<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />

Curriculum Abstract ID: 142<br />

THE CHALLENGE OF FITTING A ‘SILO’<br />

COURSE INTO AN INTEGRATED<br />

CURRICULUM-WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED<br />

TO DATE?<br />

Kerst<strong>in</strong> Höner zu Bentrup,PhD*, Jennifer W.<br />

Gibson, PhD** Tulane Medical School, *Dept. of<br />

Microbiology and Immunology, **Office of Medical<br />

Education, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA,<br />

USA.<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Integrated curricula have become the norm <strong>in</strong><br />

medical schools. The medical education literature<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s numerous reports of curriculum change<br />

but none refers <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g a former ‘silo’ course<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> an already exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegrated curriculum. We<br />

describe the process and evaluation of revis<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

Medical Microbiology course - taught orig<strong>in</strong>ally as a<br />

5 week block at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the 2nd year - <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong><br />

an exist<strong>in</strong>g Organ Systems curriculum.<br />

METHODS<br />

Before beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>tegration process, we<br />

conducted a literature re<strong>view</strong>, discussed perceived<br />

hurdles with teach<strong>in</strong>g faculty, obta<strong>in</strong>ed student<br />

feedback, and discussed relevant placement of<br />

course content with<strong>in</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g curriculum. At<br />

the end of the course, a survey was sent <strong>to</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

faculty <strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong> feedback on the <strong>in</strong>tegration process<br />

Medical Science Educa<strong>to</strong>r © <strong>IAMSE</strong> 2012 Volume 22(4S) 290

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!