13.11.2014 Views

proofs

proofs

proofs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 Borsuk’s conjecture<br />

On the other hand, if z ≢ 0, 1 (modq), then the numerator of (∗) contains<br />

one factor that is divisible by q = p m . At the same time, the product has no<br />

factors from two adjacent nonzero residue classes: one of them represents<br />

numbers that have no p-factors at all, the other one has fewer p-factors<br />

than q = p m . Hence there are more p-factors in the numerator than in the<br />

denominator, and the quotient is divisible by p.<br />

□<br />

Now we consider an arbitrary subset Q ′ ⊆ Q that does not contain any<br />

nearly-orthogonal vectors. We want to establish that Q ′ must be “small.”<br />

Claim 1. If x, y are distinct vectors from Q, then 1 4<br />

(〈x, y〉+2) is<br />

an integer in the range<br />

−(q − 2) ≤ 1 4<br />

(〈x, y〉 + 2) ≤ q − 1.<br />

Both x and y have an even number of (−1)-components, so the number of<br />

components in which x and y differ is even, too. Thus<br />

〈x, y〉 = (4q − 2) − 2#{i : x i ≠ y i } ≡ −2 (mod4)<br />

for all x, y ∈ Q, that is, 1 4<br />

(〈x, y〉 + 2) is an integer.<br />

From x, y ∈ {+1, −1} 4q−2 we see that −(4q − 2) ≤ 〈x, y〉 ≤ 4q − 2,<br />

that is, −(q − 1) ≤ 1 4<br />

(〈x, y〉 + 2) ≤ q. The lower bound never holds with<br />

equality, since x 1 = y 1 = 1 implies that x ≠ −y. The upper bound holds<br />

with equality only if x = y.<br />

Claim 2. For any y ∈ Q ′ , the polynomial in n variables x 1 , . . .,x n<br />

of degree q − 2 given by<br />

F y (x) := P ( ( 1<br />

)<br />

1<br />

4 (〈x, y〉 + 2)) =<br />

4<br />

(〈x, y〉 + 2) − 2<br />

q − 2<br />

satisfies that F y (x) is divisible by p for every x ∈ Q ′ \{y}, but<br />

not for x = y.<br />

The representation by a binomial coefficient shows that F y (x) is an integervalued<br />

polynomial. For x = y, we get F y (y) = 1. For x ≠ y, the<br />

Lemma yields that F y (x) is not divisible by p if and only if 1 4<br />

(〈x, y〉+2) is<br />

congruent to 0 or 1 (modq). By Claim 1, this happens only if 1 4<br />

(〈x, y〉+2)<br />

is either 0 or 1, that is, if 〈x, y〉 ∈ {−2, +2}. So x and y must be nearlyorthogonal<br />

for this, which contradicts the definition of Q ′ .<br />

Claim 3. The same is true for the polynomials F y (x) in the n −1<br />

variables x 2 , . . .,x n that are obtained as follows: Expand F y (x)<br />

into monomials and remove the variable x 1 , and reduce all higher<br />

powers of other variables, by substituting x 1 = 1, and x 2 i = 1 for<br />

i > 1. The polynomials F y (x) have degree at most q − 2.<br />

The vectors x ∈ Q ⊆ {+1, −1} n all satisfy x 1 = 1 and x 2 i = 1. Thus<br />

the substitutions do not change the values of the polynomials on the set Q.<br />

They also do not increase the degree, so F y (x) has degree at most q − 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!