13.11.2014 Views

proofs

proofs

proofs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

142 A theorem of Pólya on polynomials<br />

which means that I t − d ⊆ P 1 = {x : |p 1 (x)| ≤ 2}.<br />

In summary, we see that P 1 contains I 1 ∪. . .∪I t−1 ∪(I t −d) and hence has<br />

total length at least as large as P. Notice now that with the passage from<br />

p(x) to p 1 (x) the intervals I t−1 and I t − d merge into a single interval.<br />

We conclude that the intervals J 1 , . . .,J s of p 1 (x) making up P 1 have total<br />

length at least l(I 1 ) + . . . + l(I t ), and that the rightmost interval J s contains<br />

more than m roots of p 1 (x). Repeating this procedure at most t − 1<br />

times, we finally arrive at a polynomial ˜p(x) with ˜P = {x : |˜p(x)| ≤ 2}<br />

being an interval of length l( ˜P) ≥ l(I 1 ) + . . . + l(I t ), and the proof is<br />

complete.<br />

□<br />

Two facts about polynomials with real roots<br />

Let p(x) be a non-constant polynomial with only real roots.<br />

Fact 1. If b is a multiple root of p ′ (x), then b is also a root of p(x).<br />

Proof. Let b 1 < . . . < b r be the roots of p(x) with multiplicities<br />

s 1 , . . .,s r , ∑ r<br />

j=1 s j = n. From p(x) = (x − b j ) sj h(x) we infer<br />

that b j is a root of p ′ (x) if s j ≥ 2, and the multiplicity of b j in p ′ (x)<br />

is s j − 1. Furthermore, there is a root of p ′ (x) between b 1 and b 2 ,<br />

another root between b 2 and b 3 , . . . , and one between b r−1 and b r ,<br />

and all these roots must be single roots, since ∑ r<br />

j=1 (s j −1)+(r −1)<br />

counts already up to the degree n − 1 of p ′ (x). Consequently, the<br />

multiple roots of p ′ (x) can only occur among the roots of p(x). □<br />

Fact 2. We have p ′ (x) 2 ≥ p(x)p ′′ (x) for all x ∈ R.<br />

Proof. If x = a i is a root of p(x), then there is nothing to show.<br />

Assume then x is not a root. The product rule of differentiation yields<br />

p ′ (x) =<br />

n∑<br />

k=1<br />

p(x)<br />

x − a k<br />

,<br />

that is,<br />

p ′ (x)<br />

p(x)<br />

=<br />

n∑<br />

k=1<br />

1<br />

x − a k<br />

.<br />

Differentiating this again we have<br />

p ′′ (x)p(x) − p ′ (x) 2<br />

p(x) 2<br />

= −<br />

n∑<br />

k=1<br />

1<br />

(x − a k ) 2 < 0. □

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!