13.11.2014 Views

proofs

proofs

proofs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 The law of quadratic reciprocity<br />

Let p and q be odd primes, and consider ( q p<br />

). Suppose iq is a multiple of<br />

q that reduces to a negative residue r i < 0 in the Lemma of Gauss. This<br />

means that there is a unique integer j such that − p 2<br />

< iq − jp < 0. Note<br />

that 0 < j < q 2 since 0 < i < p 2 . In other words, ( q p ) = (−1)s , where s is<br />

the number of lattice points (x, y), that is, pairs of integers x, y satisfying<br />

0 < py − qx < p 2 , 0 < x < p 2 , 0 < y < q 2 . (3)<br />

Similarly, ( p q ) = (−1)t where t is the number of lattice points (x, y) with<br />

0 < qx − py < q 2 , 0 < x < p 2 , 0 < y < q 2 . (4)<br />

Now look at the rectangle with side lengths p 2 , q 2<br />

, and draw the two lines<br />

parallel to the diagonal py = qx, y = q p x+ 1 2 or py −qx = p 2 , respectively,<br />

y = q p (x − 1 2 ) or qx − py = q 2 .<br />

The figure shows the situation for p = 17, q = 11.<br />

11<br />

2<br />

p = 17 q = 11<br />

s = 5 t = 3<br />

`q ´<br />

= (−1) 5 = −1<br />

p<br />

`p ´<br />

= (−1) 3 = −1<br />

q<br />

R<br />

The proof is now quickly completed by the following three observations:<br />

17<br />

2<br />

S<br />

1. There are no lattice points on the diagonal and the two parallels. This<br />

is so because py = qx would imply p | x, which cannot be. For the<br />

parallels observe that py − qx is an integer while p 2 or q 2<br />

are not.<br />

2. The lattice points observing (3) are precisely the points in the upper<br />

strip 0 < py − qx < p 2<br />

, and those of (4) the points in the lower strip<br />

0 < qx − py < q 2<br />

. Hence the number of lattice points in the two strips<br />

is s + t.<br />

3. The outer regions R : py − qx > p 2 and S : qx − py > q 2<br />

contain the<br />

same number of points. To see this consider the map ϕ : R → S which<br />

maps (x, y) to ( p+1<br />

2<br />

− x, q+1<br />

2<br />

− y) and check that ϕ is an involution.<br />

Since the total number of lattice points in the rectangle is p−1<br />

2<br />

· q−1<br />

2 , we<br />

infer that s + t and p−1<br />

2<br />

· q−1<br />

2<br />

have the same parity, and so<br />

(q<br />

p<br />

)(p<br />

q<br />

)<br />

= (−1) s+t = (−1) p−1 q−1<br />

2 2 . □

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!