24.11.2014 Views

CLE Materials for Panel #1 - George Washington University Law ...

CLE Materials for Panel #1 - George Washington University Law ...

CLE Materials for Panel #1 - George Washington University Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WILMARTH<br />

4/1/2011 1:11 PM<br />

1054 OREGON LAW REVIEW [Vol. 89, 951<br />

their effectiveness on the same federal regulatory agencies that failed<br />

to stop excessive risk taking by financial institutions during the<br />

booms that preceded both crises. 448 As Johnson and Kwak observe:<br />

[S]olutions that depend on smarter, better regulatory supervision<br />

and corrective action ignore the political constraints on regulation<br />

and the political power of the large banks. The idea that we can<br />

simply regulate large banks more effectively assumes that<br />

regulators will have the incentive to do so, despite everything we<br />

know about regulatory capture and political constraints on<br />

regulation. 449<br />

Moreover, the future effectiveness of the FSOC is open to serious<br />

question in light of the agency turf battles and other bureaucratic<br />

failings that have plagued similar multiagency oversight bodies in<br />

other fields of governmental activity (e.g., the Department of<br />

Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National<br />

Intelligence). 450<br />

As explained above, Dodd-Frank’s most promising re<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong><br />

preventing future TBTF bailouts—the OLA—does not completely<br />

shut the door to future rescues <strong>for</strong> creditors of LCFIs. The FRB can<br />

provide emergency liquidity assistance to troubled LCFIs through the<br />

discount window and (perhaps) through “broad-based” liquidity<br />

facilities (like the Primary Dealer Credit Facility) that are designed to<br />

help targeted groups of the largest financial institutions. The FHLBs<br />

can make secured advances to LCFIs. The FDIC can use its Treasury<br />

borrowing authority and the SRE to protect uninsured creditors of<br />

failed SIFIs and their subsidiary banks. While Dodd-Frank has<br />

undoubtedly made TBTF bailouts more difficult, the continued<br />

existence of these avenues <strong>for</strong> financial assistance indicates that<br />

Dodd-Frank is not likely to prevent future TBTF rescues during<br />

episodes of systemic financial distress. 451<br />

448 See supra notes 254–60 and accompanying text.<br />

449 JOHNSON &KWAK, supra note 137, at 207.<br />

450 See, e.g., Dara Kay Cohen et al., Crisis Bureaucracy: Homeland Security and the<br />

Political Design of Legal Mandates, 59 STAN. L.REV. 673, 675–78, 718–20, 738–43<br />

(2006) (analyzing organizational problems and operational failures within the Department<br />

of Homeland Security); Dana Priest & William M. Arkin, A Hidden World, Growing<br />

Beyond Control, WASH. POST, July 19, 2010, at A1 (discussing organizational problems<br />

and operational failures within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence); Paul R.<br />

Pillar, Unintelligent Design, NAT’L INTEREST, July–August 2010 (same).<br />

451 See supra Part V.C. Other commentators agree that Dodd-Frank will not prevent<br />

future bailouts of TBTF institutions. See, e.g., Peter Eavis, A Bank Overhaul Too Weak to<br />

Hail, WALL ST. J., June 26, 2010, at B14; David Pauly, Congress Puts Out ‘Sell’ Order on<br />

American Banks, BLOOMBERG (June 28, 2010), http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!