24.11.2014 Views

CLE Materials for Panel #1 - George Washington University Law ...

CLE Materials for Panel #1 - George Washington University Law ...

CLE Materials for Panel #1 - George Washington University Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WILMARTH<br />

4/1/2011 1:11 PM<br />

2011] The Dodd-Frank Act 1011<br />

viewed as an implicit admission of Basel II’s inadequacy. 251 After<br />

reviewing a preliminary version of the Basel III proposals, a<br />

prominent U.K. financial commentator observed, “We can say with<br />

conviction now that Basel II failed.” 252<br />

Third, the past shortcomings of capital-based rules are part of a<br />

broader phenomenon of supervisory failure. Regulators did not stop<br />

large banks from pursuing hazardous (and in many cases fatal)<br />

strategies during the 1980s, including rapid growth with heavy<br />

concentrations in high-risk assets and excessive reliance on volatile,<br />

short-term liabilities. During the 1980s, regulators proved to be<br />

unwilling or unable to stop risky behavior as long as banks continued<br />

to report profits. 253 Similarly, although the full story is yet to be told,<br />

there is wide agreement that federal banking and securities regulators<br />

repeatedly failed to restrain excessive risk taking by LCFIs during the<br />

decade leading up to the financial crisis. 254<br />

Fourth, repeated regulatory failures during past financial crises<br />

reflect a “political economy of regulation” 255 in which regulators face<br />

significant political and practical challenges that undermine their<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts to discipline LCFIs. A full discussion of those challenges is<br />

beyond the scope of this Article. For present purposes, it is sufficient<br />

to note that analysts have pointed to strong evidence of “capture” of<br />

financial regulatory agencies by LCFIs during the two decades<br />

leading up to the financial crisis, due to factors such as (1) large<br />

political contributions made by LCFIs, (2) an intellectual and policy<br />

environment favoring deregulation, and (3) a continuous interchange<br />

of senior personnel between the largest financial institutions and the<br />

top echelons of the financial regulatory agencies. 256 Commentators<br />

251 See, e.g., Re<strong>for</strong>ming Banking: Base Camp Basel, supra note 244; Yalman Onaran et<br />

al., The Global Battle over New Rules <strong>for</strong> Banks, BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK, May 31–<br />

June 6, 2010, at 41.<br />

252 Onaran et al., supra note 251, at 42 (quoting Charles Goodhart).<br />

253 FED.DEPOSIT INS.CORP., supra note 245, at 39–46, 245–47, 373–78.<br />

254 See JOHNSON &KWAK, supra note 137, at 120–50; McCoy et al., supra note 14, at<br />

1343–66; see also Coffee, supra note 239, at 17–18 (stating that “[a]greement is virtually<br />

universal that lax regulation by all the financial regulators played a significant role in the<br />

2008 financial crisis”).<br />

255 Gordon & Muller, supra note 200, at 26.<br />

256 JOHNSON &KWAK, supra note 137, at 82–109, 118–21, 133–50; see also Deniz<br />

Igan et al., A Fistful of Dollars: Lobbying and the Financial Crisis (Int’l Monetary Fund,<br />

Working Paper 09/287, 2009), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1531520; ROBERT<br />

WEISSMAN &JAMES DONAHUE, ESSENTIAL INFO. &CONSUMER EDUC. FOUND., SOLD<br />

OUT: HOW WALL STREET AND WASHINGTON BETRAYED AMERICA (2009), available at<br />

http://www.wallstreetwatch.org/reports/sold _out.pdf.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!