25.11.2014 Views

Jekyll_text

Jekyll_text

Jekyll_text

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

328 THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND<br />

how privately-issued bank notes could serve precisely the same<br />

purpose as printing-press money—with precisely the same disastrous<br />

results. That being the case, the monetary and political<br />

scientists decided to end run the Constitution. Their plan was to<br />

establish a bank, to give that bank the power to create money, to<br />

lend most of that money to the government, and then to make sure<br />

the IOUs are accepted as money by the public. Congress, therefore,<br />

would not be emitting bills of credit. The bank would do that.<br />

Thus, the First Bank of the United States was conceived.<br />

The proposal was submitted to Congress in 1790 by Alexander<br />

Hamilton who, at that time, was Secretary of the Treasury.<br />

Hamilton, incidentally, was a former aide to Robert Morris, founder<br />

of the Bank of North America, so in that sense his role in this<br />

matter is not surprising. What is surprising is the fact that Hamilton<br />

had been a staunch supporter of a sound currency during the<br />

Constitutional Convention. This is hard to reconcile, and one must<br />

suspect that, even the most well intentioned of men can become<br />

corrupted by the temptations of wealth and power. It is possible<br />

that Hamilton, Morris, and other Federalist leaders had hoped to<br />

keep the government out of the money-making business, not<br />

because it was the constitutional thing to do, but because that<br />

would leave the field clear for a central-bank mechanism which,<br />

because it was further from public view and political control, could<br />

become their own private engine of profit. It would appear that the<br />

only other explanation is that these men were fickle in their views<br />

and did not really understand the implications of their acts. In view<br />

of their brilliance in all other matters, however, it is difficult to<br />

muster enthusiasm for that interpretation.<br />

THE HAMILTON-JEFFERSON CONFLICT<br />

Hamilton's proposal was strongly opposed by Thomas<br />

Jefferson, then Secretary of State, and this was the beginning of a<br />

heated political debate that would preoccupy Congress for many<br />

decades to come. In fact, it was one of the central issues that led to<br />

the creation of our first political parties. The Federalists gathered<br />

around the ideas of Hamilton. The anti-Federalists, later called the<br />

Republicans, were attracted to the ideas of Jefferson. 1<br />

1. Curiously, the present Democratic Party traces its origin to Jefferson's Republi-<br />

THE CREATURE COMES TO AMERICA 329<br />

Jefferson pointed out that the Constitution did not grant to<br />

Congress the power to create a bank or anything similar. That<br />

means such power is reserved to the states or to the people. In a<br />

rebuttal to Hamilton's proposal, he said: "To take a single step<br />

beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of<br />

Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no<br />

Furthermore, he said, even if<br />

longer susceptible of any definition."<br />

the Constitution had granted such power, it would be an extremely<br />

unwise thing to do, because allowing banks to create money could<br />

only lead to national ruin.<br />

Hamilton, on the other hand, argued that debt was a good<br />

thing, if kept within reason, and that the nation needed more<br />

money in circulation to keep up with expanding commerce. Only<br />

the Bank, he said, would be able to provide that. Furthermore,<br />

while it is true the Constitution did not specifically grant the power<br />

to create such a bank, it was, nevertheless, an implied power,<br />

because it was needed to accomplish other functions which were<br />

granted in the Constitution.<br />

That was the end run.<br />

Nothing could be more polarized than the opposing ideas of<br />

these two men:<br />

JEFFERSON: "A private central bank issuing the public currency is a<br />

greater menace to the liberties of the people than a standing army."<br />

"We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt"<br />

HAMILTON: "No society could succeed which did not unite the<br />

interest and credit of rich individuals with those of the state." "A<br />

national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing."<br />

AMERICA'S SECOND CENTRAL BANK IS CREATED<br />

After a year of intense debate, Hamilton's views prevailed and,<br />

in 1791, Congress granted a twenty-year charter to the Bank of the<br />

:<br />

I- "Opinion of Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State/' February 15, 1791, quoted by<br />

Krooss, pp. 147-48.<br />

2. The comparison between private banks and standing armies can be found in<br />

many of Jefferson's letters and public utterances. For example, see The Writings of<br />

Thomas Jefferson (New York: G.P. Putnam & Sons, 1899), Vol. X, p. 31.<br />

©. The Basic Writings of Thomas Jefferson (Willey Book Company, 1944), p. 749.<br />

|k Quoted by Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Age of Jackson (New York: Mentor<br />

Books, 1945), pp. 6-7.<br />

5. Written on April 30, 1781, to his mentor, Robert Morris. Quoted by John H.<br />

Makin, The Global Debt Crisis: America's Growing Involvement (New York: Basic<br />

Books, 1984), p. 246.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!