25.11.2014 Views

Jekyll_text

Jekyll_text

Jekyll_text

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

—<br />

42 THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND PROTECTORS OF THE PUBLIC 43<br />

privy to information, long before the public received it, which<br />

would affect the market price of Perm Central's stock. Chris Welles,<br />

in The Last Days of the Club, describes what happened:<br />

On May 21, a month before the railroad went under, David Bevan,<br />

Penn Central's chief financial officer, privately informed<br />

representatives of the company's banking creditors that its<br />

financial<br />

condition was so weak it would have to postpone an attempt to raise<br />

$100 million in desperately needed operating funds through a bond<br />

issue. Instead, said Bevan, the railroad would seek some kind of<br />

government loan guarantee. In other words, unless the railroad could<br />

manage a federal bailout, it would have to close down. The following<br />

day, Chase Manhattan's trust department sold 134,300 shares of its<br />

Penn Central holdings. Before May 28, when the public was informed<br />

of the postponement of the bond issue, Chase sold another 128,000<br />

shares. David Rockefeller, the bank's chairman, vigorously denied<br />

Chase had acted on the basis of inside information.<br />

More to the point of this study is the fact that virtually all of the<br />

major management decisions which led to Penn Central's demise<br />

were made by or with the concurrence of its board of directors,<br />

which is to say, by the banks that provided the loans. In other<br />

words, the bankers were not in trouble because of Penn Central's<br />

poor management, they were Penn Central's poor management. An<br />

investigation conducted in 1972 by Congressman Wright Patman,<br />

Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee,<br />

revealed the following: The banks provided large loans for disastrous<br />

expansion and diversification projects. They loaned additional<br />

millions to the railroad so it could pay dividends to its<br />

stockholders. This created the false appearance of prosperity and<br />

artificially inflated the market price of its stock long enough to<br />

dump it<br />

on the unsuspecting public. Thus, the banker-managers<br />

were able to engineer a three-way bonanza for themselves. They (1)<br />

received dividends on essentially worthless stock, (2) earned<br />

interest on the loans which provided the money to pay those<br />

dividends, and (3) were able to unload 1.8 million shares of<br />

stock after the dividends, of course—at unrealistically high<br />

prices. Reports from the Securities and Exchange Commission<br />

1. Chris Welles, The Last Days of the Club (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1975), pp. 398-99.<br />

2 "Penn Central/' 1971 Congressional Quarterly Almanac (Washington, D.C.: Congressional<br />

Quarterly, 1971), p. 838.<br />

showed that the company's top executives had disposed of their<br />

stock in this fashion at a personal savings of more than $1 million.<br />

Had the railroad been allowed to go into bankruptcy at that<br />

point and been forced to sell off its assets, the bankers still would<br />

have been protected. In any liquidation, debtors are paid off first,<br />

stockholders last; so the manipulators had dumped most of their<br />

stock while prices were relatively high. That is a common practice<br />

among corporate raiders who use borrowed funds to seize control<br />

of a company, bleed off its assets to other enterprises which they<br />

abo control, and then toss the debt-ridden, dying carcass upon the<br />

remaining stockholders or, in this case, the taxpayers.<br />

THE PUBLIC BE DAMNED<br />

In his letter of transmittal accompanying the staff report,<br />

Congressman Patman provided this summary:<br />

It was as though everyone was a part of a close knit club in which<br />

Penn Central and its officers could obtain, with very few questions<br />

asked, loans for almost everything they desired both for the company<br />

and for their own personal interests, where the bankers sitting on the<br />

Board asked practically no questions as to what was going on, simply<br />

allowing management to destroy the company, to invest in<br />

questionable activities, and to engage in some cases in illegal activities.<br />

These banks in return obtained most of the company's lucrative<br />

banking business. The attitude of everyone seemed to be, while the<br />

game was going on, that all these dealings were of benefit to every<br />

member of the club, and the railroad and the public be damned.<br />

The banking cartel, commonly called the Federal Reserve<br />

System, was created for exactly this kind of bailout. Arthur Burns,<br />

who was the Fed's chairman, would have preferred to provide a<br />

direct infusion of newly created money, but that was contrary to<br />

the rules at that time. In his own words: "Everything fell through.<br />

We couldn't lend it to them ourselves under the law.. . .<br />

I worked on<br />

this thing in other ways."^<br />

The company's cash crisis came to a head over a weekend and,<br />

in order to avoid having the corporation forced to file for bankruptcy<br />

on Monday morning, Burns called the homes of the heads of<br />

the Federal Reserve banks around the country and told them to get<br />

1- "Penn Central: Bankruptcy Filed After Loan Bill Fails/' 1970 Congressional<br />

Quarterly Almanac (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1970), p. 811.<br />

2- Quoted by Welles, pp. 404-05.<br />

3- Quoted by Welles, p. 407.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!