You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
—<br />
42 THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND PROTECTORS OF THE PUBLIC 43<br />
privy to information, long before the public received it, which<br />
would affect the market price of Perm Central's stock. Chris Welles,<br />
in The Last Days of the Club, describes what happened:<br />
On May 21, a month before the railroad went under, David Bevan,<br />
Penn Central's chief financial officer, privately informed<br />
representatives of the company's banking creditors that its<br />
financial<br />
condition was so weak it would have to postpone an attempt to raise<br />
$100 million in desperately needed operating funds through a bond<br />
issue. Instead, said Bevan, the railroad would seek some kind of<br />
government loan guarantee. In other words, unless the railroad could<br />
manage a federal bailout, it would have to close down. The following<br />
day, Chase Manhattan's trust department sold 134,300 shares of its<br />
Penn Central holdings. Before May 28, when the public was informed<br />
of the postponement of the bond issue, Chase sold another 128,000<br />
shares. David Rockefeller, the bank's chairman, vigorously denied<br />
Chase had acted on the basis of inside information.<br />
More to the point of this study is the fact that virtually all of the<br />
major management decisions which led to Penn Central's demise<br />
were made by or with the concurrence of its board of directors,<br />
which is to say, by the banks that provided the loans. In other<br />
words, the bankers were not in trouble because of Penn Central's<br />
poor management, they were Penn Central's poor management. An<br />
investigation conducted in 1972 by Congressman Wright Patman,<br />
Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee,<br />
revealed the following: The banks provided large loans for disastrous<br />
expansion and diversification projects. They loaned additional<br />
millions to the railroad so it could pay dividends to its<br />
stockholders. This created the false appearance of prosperity and<br />
artificially inflated the market price of its stock long enough to<br />
dump it<br />
on the unsuspecting public. Thus, the banker-managers<br />
were able to engineer a three-way bonanza for themselves. They (1)<br />
received dividends on essentially worthless stock, (2) earned<br />
interest on the loans which provided the money to pay those<br />
dividends, and (3) were able to unload 1.8 million shares of<br />
stock after the dividends, of course—at unrealistically high<br />
prices. Reports from the Securities and Exchange Commission<br />
1. Chris Welles, The Last Days of the Club (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1975), pp. 398-99.<br />
2 "Penn Central/' 1971 Congressional Quarterly Almanac (Washington, D.C.: Congressional<br />
Quarterly, 1971), p. 838.<br />
showed that the company's top executives had disposed of their<br />
stock in this fashion at a personal savings of more than $1 million.<br />
Had the railroad been allowed to go into bankruptcy at that<br />
point and been forced to sell off its assets, the bankers still would<br />
have been protected. In any liquidation, debtors are paid off first,<br />
stockholders last; so the manipulators had dumped most of their<br />
stock while prices were relatively high. That is a common practice<br />
among corporate raiders who use borrowed funds to seize control<br />
of a company, bleed off its assets to other enterprises which they<br />
abo control, and then toss the debt-ridden, dying carcass upon the<br />
remaining stockholders or, in this case, the taxpayers.<br />
THE PUBLIC BE DAMNED<br />
In his letter of transmittal accompanying the staff report,<br />
Congressman Patman provided this summary:<br />
It was as though everyone was a part of a close knit club in which<br />
Penn Central and its officers could obtain, with very few questions<br />
asked, loans for almost everything they desired both for the company<br />
and for their own personal interests, where the bankers sitting on the<br />
Board asked practically no questions as to what was going on, simply<br />
allowing management to destroy the company, to invest in<br />
questionable activities, and to engage in some cases in illegal activities.<br />
These banks in return obtained most of the company's lucrative<br />
banking business. The attitude of everyone seemed to be, while the<br />
game was going on, that all these dealings were of benefit to every<br />
member of the club, and the railroad and the public be damned.<br />
The banking cartel, commonly called the Federal Reserve<br />
System, was created for exactly this kind of bailout. Arthur Burns,<br />
who was the Fed's chairman, would have preferred to provide a<br />
direct infusion of newly created money, but that was contrary to<br />
the rules at that time. In his own words: "Everything fell through.<br />
We couldn't lend it to them ourselves under the law.. . .<br />
I worked on<br />
this thing in other ways."^<br />
The company's cash crisis came to a head over a weekend and,<br />
in order to avoid having the corporation forced to file for bankruptcy<br />
on Monday morning, Burns called the homes of the heads of<br />
the Federal Reserve banks around the country and told them to get<br />
1- "Penn Central: Bankruptcy Filed After Loan Bill Fails/' 1970 Congressional<br />
Quarterly Almanac (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1970), p. 811.<br />
2- Quoted by Welles, pp. 404-05.<br />
3- Quoted by Welles, p. 407.