25.11.2014 Views

Jekyll_text

Jekyll_text

Jekyll_text

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

572 THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND<br />

on them. The voters, on the other hand, would collapse under the<br />

burden of higher taxes and demand that their Congressmen<br />

circumvent the very amendment they previously supported. And<br />

that would be easy. Most versions of the balanced-budget amendment<br />

have an escape hatch built for just that purpose. Congress<br />

shall balance its budget "except in cases of emergency." Who decides<br />

what constitutes an emergency? Congress, of course. In other<br />

words, Congress shall balance its budget except when it doesn't<br />

want to. So what else is new?<br />

A serious amendment would have to tackle, not balancing the<br />

budget, but limiting the spending. If that were done, the budget<br />

would take care of itself. But even that would be a waste of time<br />

considering the present composition of Congress. Instead of generating<br />

political pressure for a Constitutional amendment, we would<br />

be better off directing that same effort toward throwing the big<br />

spenders out of office. As long as the spenders are allowed to stay<br />

in there, they will find a way to get around any law—including the<br />

Constitution itself.<br />

Another flaw in most versions of the balanced-budget amendment<br />

is that it would not affect the off-budget expenditures called<br />

entitlements. They now represent 52% of all federal outlays and are<br />

growing by 12% each year. A strategy that ignores that backbreaking<br />

load is not worth even considering. Furthermore, even if<br />

Congress could be forced to stop deficit spending, the balancedbudget<br />

amendment would not solve the problem of inflation or<br />

paying off the national debt. The Federal Reserve can now inflate<br />

our money supply by using literally any debt in the world. It does<br />

not have to come from Congress. Unless we zero in on the Fed<br />

itself, we will just be playing political games with no chance of<br />

winning.<br />

Every year, a few concerned Congressmen submit a bill to<br />

investigate or audit the Federal Reserve System. They are to be<br />

commended for their effort, but the process has been an exercise in<br />

futility. Their bills receive little or no publicity and never get out of<br />

committee for a vote. Even if they did receive serious attention,<br />

however, they could actually be counterproductive.<br />

On the surface, it would appear that there is nothing wrong<br />

with a Congressional investigation or an audit, but what is there to<br />

investigate? We must assume the Fed is doing exactly what it says<br />

and is in total compliance with the law. A few minor improprieties<br />

"<br />

A REALISTIC SCENARIO 573<br />

probably would be discovered involving personal abuse of funds<br />

or insider profiteering, but that would be minor compared to the<br />

gigantic fraud that already is out in the open for all to see. The<br />

Federal Reserve is<br />

the world's largest and most successful scam.<br />

Anyone who understands the nature of money can see that without<br />

a team of investigators and auditors.<br />

The danger in a proposal to audit the Fed is that it would<br />

provide an excuse to delay serious action for several years while<br />

the audit is going on. It would give the public a false impression<br />

that Congress is doing something. It also would give the monetary<br />

technicians an opportunity to lay down a smoke screen of verbiage<br />

and confusing statistics. The public would expect that all the<br />

answers will be forthcoming from the investigation, but the very<br />

groups and combines that need to be investigated would be<br />

conducting, or at least confounding, the investigation. By the time<br />

fourteen volumes of testimony, charts, tables, and exhibits finally<br />

appear, the public would be intimidated and fatigued. The bottom<br />

line is that we do not need a bill to audit the Fed. We need one to<br />

abolish it.<br />

A PLAN FOR ELIMINATING THE FED<br />

So much for things not to do. Now let's get down to the<br />

business at hand. To abolish the Federal Reserve System would be<br />

quite simple. All that would be required is an act of Congress<br />

consisting of one sentence: The Federal Reserve Act and all of its<br />

amendments are hereby rescinded. But that would wipe out our<br />

monetary system overnight and create such havoc in the economy<br />

that it would play right into the hands of the globalists. They would<br />

use the resulting chaos as evidence that such a move was a mistake,<br />

and the American people would likely welcome a, rescue from the<br />

IMF/World Bank. We would find ourselves back in the Pessimistic<br />

Scenario even though we had done the right thing.<br />

There are certain steps that must precede the abandonment of<br />

the Fed if we are to have a safe passage. The first step is to convert<br />

our present fiat money into real money. That means we must create<br />

an entirely new money supply which is 100% backed by precious<br />

jQnetal—and we must do so within a reasonably short period of<br />

ime. To that end, we also must establish the true value of our<br />

present fiat money so it can be exchanged for new money on a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!