25.11.2014 Views

RFG Annual Report 2007 - Retail Food Group

RFG Annual Report 2007 - Retail Food Group

RFG Annual Report 2007 - Retail Food Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26. Contingent liabilities and contingent assets<br />

53<br />

<strong>2007</strong><br />

$’000<br />

Consolidated<br />

2006<br />

$’000<br />

<strong>2007</strong><br />

$’000<br />

Company<br />

Contingent liabilities<br />

Financial guarantees on franchisee loans (i) 814 –<br />

Rental guarantees to ANZ Bank (ii) 287 290 – –<br />

2006<br />

$’000<br />

1,101 290 – –<br />

(i) Financial Guarantees:—<strong>RFG</strong>A Management Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Group</strong> Limited, has guaranteed the repayment of borrowings in aggregate in the sum of $814,000 by the<br />

Australia and New Zealand Banking <strong>Group</strong> (the ANZ Bank) to three separate Donut King Franchisees. The guarantees have been given as security in respect of loans made by the ANZ<br />

Bank to enable the franchisees of Donut King Seaford, Donut King Ocean Grove and Donut King Carousel (outlets K101 and K102) to commission their respective outlets. The guarantees<br />

are subject to the ANZ Banks usual terms and conditions. No liabilities have been recognised in relation to these guarantees.<br />

(ii) Rental Guarantees—Other: The <strong>Group</strong> is guarantor to a number of leases occupied and licensed to franchisees. No liabilities have been recognised as part of these rental guarantees.<br />

(iii) The <strong>Group</strong> is currently in dispute with franchisees over a number of minor matters. No liability has been recognised in relation to these matters as the Directors are confi dent that these<br />

matters will be successfully resolved.<br />

Juice Fusion indemnity<br />

A number of former Juice Fusion franchisees foreshadowed a claim against <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Group</strong> in relation to various matters associated with<br />

the operation and disposition of the Juice Fusion franchise system. It was alleged that <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Group</strong> Limited (and or its current or former<br />

subsidiary entities) failed to discharge its obligations under certain franchise agreements. The Directors did not accept that the former Juice<br />

Fusion franchisees had a valid claim against <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Group</strong> Limited or any of its current or former subsidiaries and it was determined that<br />

any claim would be vigorously defended. The Continuing Shareholders (as referred to in the Company’s Prospectus dated 31 March 2006), their<br />

Related Corporations and associates have agreed to indemnify <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Group</strong> Limited and various other parties in relation to any liability<br />

arising out of a prospective claim against <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Group</strong> Limited and/or several of its current or former subsidiaries relating to the operation<br />

and divestment of the Juice Fusion franchise system. The indemnity protects the Company from all liability except legal costs which will remain<br />

the responsibility of <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Group</strong> Limited. No liability has been recognised in relation to these matters.<br />

The claims made by nine (9) of ten (10) former Juice Fusion franchisees were subsequently settled in accordance with Deeds of Settlement<br />

formerly executed by the parties. The remaining Juice Fusion franchisee has instituted a Queensland Supreme Court action alleging among other<br />

things breach of franchise agreement and misrepresentation. These proceedings have been, and will be, vigorously defended.<br />

Donut King The Hills<br />

Proceedings were instituted in the NSW Industrial Relations Court by a former Franchisee against six respondents, including subsidiaries of <strong>Retail</strong><br />

<strong>Food</strong> <strong>Group</strong> Limited and the former Master Franchisee of the Donut King System in NSW. The proceedings sought relief for an alleged unfair<br />

contract that included a franchise agreement and outlet licence agreement for a Donut King outlet. A deed of understanding was entered into by<br />

the six respondents which effectively made <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Group</strong> liable for only 50% of the costs of the defending the action. In July <strong>2007</strong> the parties<br />

reached a confi dential settlement arrangement whereby the plaintiff was paid a settlement amount. The bulk of that amount was paid by the<br />

former Master Franchisee of the Donut King System in NSW. The parties have entered into a formal Deed of Settlement whereby the plaintiff has<br />

released each of the Defendants from all claims it may have had, or may have, in the future in connection with the matter. In accordance with the<br />

terms of this Deed, the plaintiff has also fi led a Notice of Discontinuance with the Court. Consequently, the proceedings are now at an end.<br />

<strong>Retail</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!