26.11.2014 Views

ISSUE 70 : May/Jun - 1988 - Australian Defence Force Journal

ISSUE 70 : May/Jun - 1988 - Australian Defence Force Journal

ISSUE 70 : May/Jun - 1988 - Australian Defence Force Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AUSTRALIA'S REACTION TO THE THREAT FROM JAPAN 1939-1943 41<br />

No nation in the world is making a more<br />

supreme war effort than Australia. 35<br />

The Battles of the Coral Sea and Midway in<br />

<strong>May</strong> and <strong>Jun</strong>e 1942 were strategic victories for<br />

American forces and Midway later came to be<br />

recognized as the turning point in the Pacific<br />

war. The American successes lifted the 'black<br />

blanket of dispair' from the <strong>Australian</strong> people<br />

and Curtin's major problem thereafter became<br />

the maintenance of austerity and discipline to<br />

support the <strong>Australian</strong> war effort.<br />

After Midway, the allied effort in the South<br />

West Pacific was directed to the expulsion of<br />

the Japanese forces from Papua New Guinea<br />

and the Melanesian islands and <strong>Australian</strong><br />

forces figured prominently in the campaign at<br />

Milne Bay, the first allied land victory of the<br />

theatre. By August 1942, <strong>Australian</strong> forces had<br />

re-captured Kokoda and were forcing the Japanese<br />

back to the northern coast near Popondetta.<br />

MacArthur was becoming increasingly<br />

disgruntled with <strong>Australian</strong> efforts to dislodge<br />

the Japanese from Buna and Gona and his<br />

criticisms were in marked contrast to his platitudes<br />

of early 1942.<br />

. . . these <strong>Australian</strong>s won't fight . . . they<br />

live off but not up to the name of Anzac. 36<br />

After further American-<strong>Australian</strong> rivalry and<br />

antagonism, Buna and Gona were finally cleared<br />

in late December 1942. These battles marked<br />

the end of Japanese hopes to dominate the<br />

Owen Stanley Range and access to Port Moresby<br />

and strategically, removed the threat of<br />

invasion from Australia.<br />

In summary then, what were the effects upon<br />

Australia of the threat of Japanese invasion?<br />

As indicated by the statistics at Appendix 1,<br />

allocations to the war effort increased markedly<br />

in terms of manpower, materiel and finance.<br />

The 'conscription' of industry and Lend-Lease<br />

aid resulted in the rapid acceleration of the<br />

industrialization of Australia and established<br />

the basis for an extremely viable post-war secondary<br />

industry. The domestic initiatives of uniform<br />

taxation and social security became permanent<br />

features of the <strong>Australian</strong> lifestyle and<br />

whilst not directly attributable to the threat,<br />

were introduced under the guise of war-time<br />

economics.<br />

In terms of external affairs, the threat by<br />

Japan resulted in the temporary transfer of<br />

'dependence' from Britain to America, closer<br />

regional collaboration, the development of a<br />

more independent foreign policy and a desire<br />

to participate in the maintenance of world stability.<br />

The trauma of war also appears to have<br />

created a greater public awareness of Australia's<br />

place in the world and in world affairs generally,<br />

and thus tended to reduce <strong>Australian</strong> insularity<br />

and prejudice.<br />

With the benefit of hindsight, it is easy to<br />

be cynical of the <strong>Australian</strong> reaction to the<br />

threat of invasion. 37 Nevertheless, it is obvious<br />

from contemporary accounts, particularly in the<br />

period December 1941 to <strong>Jun</strong>e 1942, that the<br />

threat appeared genuine and that fears of invasion<br />

were justified. One of the criticisms of<br />

Curtin is that his Government exaggerated the<br />

dangers from Japan in order to manipulate<br />

public opinion to accept the implementation of<br />

Labor 'socialist' policies. Curtin denies that this<br />

occurred. He recognised that certain permanent<br />

features would develop out of war-time controls<br />

that would assist a Labor Government but was<br />

adamant that he 'would not use the opportunity<br />

of war to introduce socialist ideas'. 38<br />

Throughout the period 1939-1943 though, the<br />

recurring theme is not the fear of Japan but<br />

the apathy of the <strong>Australian</strong> people. Some commentators<br />

blame the Government for a lack of<br />

direction but the underlying reason appears to<br />

have been that for many <strong>Australian</strong>s, the memories<br />

of World War, 1 and the depression created<br />

an abhorrence of war and a distrust of<br />

government and they simply withdrew into the<br />

confines of their environ. Curtin was especially<br />

critical of such people.<br />

His deep love of Australia clashed with the<br />

belief that there was a big section with whom<br />

Australia did not come first. 39<br />

This statement epitomizes the beliefs of Curtin.<br />

Whereas MacArthur's fundamental interest<br />

was to defeat Japan, Curtin's was to protect<br />

Australia. Although Curtin incurred the wrath<br />

of many, he resolutely put the interests of Australia<br />

ahead of all else, including the traditional<br />

relationship with Britain and the aspirations of<br />

his Party.<br />

In conclusion then, it is contended that Curtin<br />

and his Government deserve considerable credit<br />

for their reactions to the threat of invasion by<br />

Japan for, by their 'nationalism', they safeguarded<br />

the ultimate aspirations of Australia<br />

— her survival as a nation and her survival as<br />

a democracy.<br />

^

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!