26.11.2014 Views

Lesser-Key-Of-Solomon

Lesser-Key-Of-Solomon

Lesser-Key-Of-Solomon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ApPENDIX I. ADDENDA<br />

FOUND IN SLOANE 2731 AND 3648<br />

Sloane 2731 omits the 5 th book, Ars Notoria, but instead inserts three folios<br />

(30-32), containing:<br />

A list ofnames, some with corrupt Hebrew lettering;<br />

An experiment relating to recovering stolen goods;<br />

Explanations of the circle and "triangles" of<strong>Solomon</strong>;<br />

Alternate versions of "The 5 th Wandring prince Emoniel" and "the 7th<br />

spirit called Soleriel" from Book 2.<br />

These articles derive from Sloane 3648, which does include Ars Notoria,<br />

as well as extracts from Agrippa, Paracelsus, and de Abano. The first two<br />

articles are clearly unrelated to the Lemegeton. However, the "explanations"<br />

were included by Mathers in his edition ofthe Goetia. Since they<br />

are ofexegetical nature, I have included them in this appendix.<br />

The "explanations" refer to diagrams found in Book 1. They contain lists of<br />

sacred names with corresponding short phrases that are more of the character<br />

of prayers rather than etymologies. The lists contain corrupted versions<br />

of the names listed in the magic circle from the Goetia. They are<br />

based ultimately on Agrippa, De Occulta Philosophia, Book II, chapter 13<br />

(Leiden: E.]. Brill, 1992), p. 289. Mathers supplied the title "Explanation<br />

of certain names used in this book Lemegeton," but given the content, it<br />

should read "The Explanation of the Circle of <strong>Solomon</strong>." Oddly, Mathers<br />

omitted the subheadings.<br />

This is followed by two similar lists titled "The Explanation of the<br />

two triangles in the Parchment" and "The Explanation of <strong>Solomon</strong>'s<br />

Triangle."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!