25.12.2014 Views

Official Election Pamphlet - Alaska Elections State Division of Elections

Official Election Pamphlet - Alaska Elections State Division of Elections

Official Election Pamphlet - Alaska Elections State Division of Elections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ballot Measure No. 1<br />

Constitutional Convention Question<br />

The <strong>Alaska</strong> <strong>State</strong> Constitution states that during any ten-year period, if a constitutional<br />

convention has not been held, the lieutenant governor shall place on the ballot for the next<br />

general election the question:<br />

Ballot Language<br />

Ballot Measure No. 1<br />

Constitutional Convention Question<br />

Shall there be a constitutional convention<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Legislative Affairs Agency Summary<br />

This question relates to a call for a constitutional convention. At the convention the state<br />

constitution may be amended or revised, subject to approval by the voters. Under the state<br />

constitution, the voters must have the chance to vote on the question <strong>of</strong> whether there should<br />

be a constitutional convention if there has not been a convention during the last ten years.<br />

There has not been a convention in the last ten years. This question asks voters to say<br />

whether there should be a constitutional convention.<br />

<strong>State</strong>ment in Support<br />

“The times they are a changing,” said Bob Dylan. Thomas Jefferson agreed that change<br />

requires periodic review <strong>of</strong> a constitution. Are some changes in the fundamental document<br />

required to update to changing circumstances <strong>Alaska</strong>’s constitutional authors understood<br />

change, which is why you are asked to vote on this question every ten years. It is now more<br />

than fifty years since <strong>Alaska</strong>ns, then subjects <strong>of</strong> Territorial government, drew up this document.<br />

It has with exceptions, served us well, but the times have changed.<br />

Since drawn in part to persuade the Congress to give us statehood, the constitution was short<br />

on innovation. “One person, one vote” was not yet the law <strong>of</strong> the land, so representation in a<br />

single larger chamber without a separate senate drew little consideration. In a state now with<br />

a much larger population, unicameralism would bring economies, enhanced accountability<br />

and smaller districts, closer to the people if we combined the 40 and 20 into one 60 member<br />

chamber as was done in Nebraska.<br />

But the biggest change has been the growth <strong>of</strong> money, <strong>of</strong>ten corporate, <strong>of</strong>ten secret money, as<br />

the deciding factor in our elections. Many in the legislature are favored by this system, which<br />

is why the people in convention must bring change.<br />

The statement printed on this page is the opinion <strong>of</strong> the author(s) and is presented as submitted to the <strong>Division</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Election</strong>s.<br />

PAGE 66<br />

2012 REGION III

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!