View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

70 Flow per Area, cm/s 60 50 40 30 20 y = 22.322x 0.457 R 2 = 0.9981 10 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Level, m Belton woven, not vacuumed 70 Flow per Area, cm/s 60 50 40 30 20 y = 19.152x 0.5703 R 2 = 0.9953 10 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Level, m Belton woven, vacuumed 135
70 60 Flow per Area, cm/s 50 40 30 20 10 y = 89.962x 0.7067 R 2 = 0.9961 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Level, m Mirafi non-woven, not vacuumed 70 60 Flow per Area, cm/s 50 40 30 20 10 y = 90.998x 0.7576 R 2 = 0.9898 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Level, m Mirafi non-woven, vacuumed 136
Page 1:
CRWR Online Report 95-6 AN EVALUATI
Page 5:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was s
Page 8 and 9:
4.2.3 TSS Reduction Efficiency of S
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 2.1
Page 13 and 14:
and reduce construction duration (G
Page 15 and 16:
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Introducti
Page 17 and 18:
are characterized by lower permeabi
Page 19 and 20:
size and is the estimated largest p
Page 21 and 22:
corrected to a viscosity at 20 o C
Page 23 and 24:
Influent samples from each of the t
Page 25 and 26:
emaining 10% ranged from 15 to 50
Page 27 and 28:
Much less research has been directe
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 3.1 Location of Inventoried
Page 31 and 32:
Table 3.2 Costs of Temporary Contro
Page 33 and 34:
The inventory data indicate that si
Page 35 and 36:
nature of construction activities r
Page 37 and 38:
the discharge was 1542 mg/L, with a
Page 39 and 40:
emained in suspension and were able
Page 41 and 42:
Effluent Sampling Location Rock Ber
Page 43 and 44:
5. LABORATORY TESTS OF SILT FENCES
Page 45 and 46:
along with runoff from the flume. T
Page 47 and 48:
Table 5.3 Grain sizes, Gradation, R
Page 49 and 50:
phenomenon is similar to sediment-l
Page 51 and 52:
w A S h 1 Silt Fence Figure 5.4 Vol
Page 53 and 54:
Many of the tests ended after 48 ho
Page 55 and 56:
observation demonstrates that field
Page 57 and 58:
The permeameter initially was set u
Page 59 and 60:
Flow per Area, cm/s 40 30 20 10 0 y
Page 61 and 62:
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 63 and 64:
topping. Knowledge of the performan
Page 65 and 66:
Das, B. M., 1985, “Principles of
Page 67:
Soil Conservation Service (SCS), 19
Page 71 and 72:
Sample Descriptions Samples T1-T30
Page 73 and 74:
Samples T109-T122 Although samples
Page 75 and 76:
individual analyses of samples T1-T
Page 77 and 78:
2 6 7 4 1 Fort McGrude Bannister Ln
Page 79 and 80:
N T6 W W W W W W W W W W W T7 T5 T8
Page 81 and 82:
LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 Water Boundary
Page 83 and 84:
T34 T38 NW NW NW NW T39 NW NW NW NW
Page 85 and 86:
T49 T50 T53 T54 T58 W T55 W W W W T
Page 87 and 88:
T75 W W W LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 Wate
Page 89 and 90:
N T105 T106 T107 T108 T97 T98 T101
Page 91 and 92: T117 N LEGEND: T118 -W- -NW- T18 Wa
Page 93: APPENDIX B - RESULTS OF SAMPLE ANAL
Page 96 and 97: SAMPLE DATE TIME DESCRIPTOR SITE TS
Page 98 and 99: T64 4/7/93 10:55AM UPSTREAM C 6 NIA
Page 100 and 101: Table B2. Results of Particle Size
Page 102 and 103: Table B4. Silt Fence Turbidity Redu
Page 105 and 106: Total Suspended Solids The analysis
Page 107 and 108: APPENDIX D - CATALOG OF FLUME TESTS
Page 109 and 110: Test number: 1 Influent Samples : D
Page 119 and 120: Test number: 11 Influent Samples :
Page 139 and 140: 132
Page 141: Amoco woven d = #20 sieve d = 8.50E
Page 145 and 146: APPENDIX F - BASE EFFICIENCY TEST 1
Page 147 and 148: Date = 9/17/94 Influent Samples: St
show all

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?